RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 15 September 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050000609
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. John N. Slone | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Eric N. Andersen | |Member |
| |Ms. Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration to chief
warrant officer four (CW4) under the 2003 criteria.
2. The applicant states that some of the records and documents that were
provided in his promotion packet were not made available to the promotion
board for review. He provided hard copies since his records had not been
transferred from the Army National Guard to the United States Army Reserve
(USAR).
3. The evidence stated as being submitted with the applicant's application
was not provided to the Board.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of
Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command – St. Louis,
Missouri, it was determined that the applicant’s official military
personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and
non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2003 and 2004 Reserve Components
Selection Boards (RCSB). His officer evaluation reports for the periods
ending 2 March 1999 and 31 May 1998 were not seen.
2. The applicant was separated from the USAR effective 21 December 2004,
based on his two non-selections for promotion to CW4.
3. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion consideration/
reconsideration by a SSB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration
or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for
promotion to CW4 by the 2003 and 2004 RCSB's and should now be submitted
for appropriate SSB consideration for this purpose.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be
appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
___cak __ ____jns__ ____ena_ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by placing the officer evaluation reports for the periods ending
2 March 1999 and 31 May 1998 on the OMPF of the individual concerned.
2. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his
records be submitted to duly constituted SSB's as deemed appropriate for
promotion consideration for CW4 under the 2003 and the 2004 criteria.
3. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was
promoted to CW4 on his date of eligibility, as determined by appropriate
Departmental officials, using the either the 2003 or 2004 criteria,
provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for
promotion.
4. That if the applicant was selected and previously separated, his
records be further corrected to show:
a. that his discharge, is void, and of no force or effect, that he
was credited with qualifying service for Reserve retirement for his
respective retirement years, from the dates of his now-voided discharge to
the date of his return to the Ready Reserve;
b. that an adequate explanation be placed in his official personnel
file to show that the gap in his officer evaluation reports, from the date
of his now-voided discharge to the date of return to the Ready Reserve, was
not caused by any fault on his part, and to insure that he is not
prejudiced thereby in the consideration of any future personnel actions;
and
c. that all documents related to his now-voided non-selection for
promotion, and his discharge be expunged from his official military
records.
5. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
________John N. Slone_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050000609 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20050915 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |131.00 |
|2. |131.10 |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086380C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089113C070403
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089931C070403
The applicant states that he is requesting an opportunity to present an updated and completed packet containing each and every officer evaluation report for the selection board. The applicant’s military records show that he was appointed in the Reserve as a second lieutenant effective 24 July 1970. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091750C070212
The applicant states that he was not provided due process because the majority of his official military personnel file (OMPF) was not available for review by the promotion selection boards and the special selection boards (SSB's). Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), it was determined that the applicant’s OMPF contained material error when he was considered and not selected for promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083549C070212
Effective 29 August 2003, the applicant was discharged from the USAR based on his nonselections for promotion. The regulation in effect at the time provided for standby advisory boards (STAB) in those cases where an officer was eligible for consideration and whose records were not submitted for review and for officers whose records contained material error when viewed by the board. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009527C070208
The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resource Command (AHRC) – St. Louis reviewed the applicant’s record and determined he was erroneously not considered for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 and 2002 RCSBs, and that he was eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 2001 and 2002 CW4 RCSB selection criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. If selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004011
The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * USAR Discharge Orders * College Transcripts * Honorable Discharge Certificate * E-mail exchanged with various individuals CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. She was considered for promotion to CPT by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Reserve Components Selection Promotion Board (RCSB) that convened on 6 November 2007; the board results were released on 31 December 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002346C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, a civilian education waiver, promotion reconsideration to captain by a special selection board (SSB), and reinstatement in an active Reserve status. The HRC sent a memorandum to the applicant, dated 8 April 2004, second time non-select for promotion to captain, due to civilian education requirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all State of Florida and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting his 2002...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100126C070208
In order to do that, he enlisted in the ARNG in May 2002 in pay grade E-4. The applicant’s husband enlisted in the ARNG on 28 January 1982, was promoted to pay grade E-5, and was honorably discharged from his enlisted status on 29 June 1984 due to his appointment as a second lieutenant the following day. As a result, the Board recommends that all Alabama Army National Guard records, the National Guard Bureau records, and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053555C070420
Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2000 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). This regulation specifies that promotion reconsideration by a special selection board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error, which existed in the record at the time of...