Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089113C070403
Original file (2003089113C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
         PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 24 July 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003089113


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Stephanie Thompkins Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. John P. Infante Member
Ms. Yolanda Maldonado Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration to chief warrant officer four (CW4).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that his promotion package did not include his military education and several officer evaluation reports.

4. He was considered and not selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB.

5. He was discharged in 2003 based on his two-time non-selection.

6. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB.

7. Reserve promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record of a commissioned warrant officer at the time of consideration. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. It further specifies that promotion reconsideration by a STAB may only be based upon ABCMR determination approved by the Secretary of the Army.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB and should now be submitted to a duly constituted STAB for promotion reconsideration.

2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION
:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing an updated and completed record to include the highest level military education and all officer evaluation reports of the individual concerned on his OMPF.

2. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his records be submitted to a duly constituted STAB under 2002 criteria, as appropriate.

3. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.

4. That if the applicant was selected but previously separated, his records be further corrected to show:

         a. that his discharge, as applicable, is void, and of no force or effect, that he was credited with qualifying service for Reserve retirement for his respective retirement years, from the dates of his now-voided discharge to the date of his return to the Ready Reserve;

         b. that an adequate explanation be placed in his official personnel files to show that the gap in his officer evaluation reports, from the dates of his now-voided discharge to the date of return to the Ready Reserve, was not caused by any fault on his part, and to insure that he is not prejudiced thereby in the consideration of any future personnel actions; and

         c. that all documents related to his now-voided non-selection for promotion by the 2002 RCSB and his discharge be expunged from his official military records.

5. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.

BOARD VOTE
:

_AAO____ _YM____ _JPI___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                 
                  Arthur A. Omartian____
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003089113
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030724
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.00
2. 131.10
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086380C070212

    Original file (2003086380C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089108C070403

    Original file (2003089108C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 RCSB. A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089098C070403

    Original file (2003089098C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that the last officer evaluation report seen by the promotion board was for an annual training he completed in 1999. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090217C070212

    Original file (2003090217C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when she was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089465C070403

    Original file (2003089465C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his 1998 officer evaluation report was never forwarded for profiling and was not seen by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089439C070403

    Original file (2003089439C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that all of his officer evaluation reports were not present for consideration by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to CW4 by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090218C070212

    Original file (2003090218C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW3 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090730C070212

    Original file (2003090730C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer four by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. It was also determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered for promotion to chief warrant officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086344C070212

    Original file (2003086344C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that when his record was reviewed for promotion it did not contain his civilian and military education. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 1993 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error with the absence of his civilian and military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000609C070206

    Original file (20050000609C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence stated as being submitted with the applicant's application was not provided to the Board. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command – St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2003 and 2004 Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB). The Board determined...