Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089907C070212
Original file (2003089907C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: JANUARY 13, 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003089907


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deyon D. Battle Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Lana E. McGlynn Chairperson
Mr. Patrick H. McGann Member
Mr. Roger W. Able Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that she completed the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) and that she received the Noncommissioned Officers (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon.

2. The applicant states that she would never have been promoted to the pay grade of E-5 unless she had successfully completed PLDC.

3. The applicant provides a copy of orders dated 22 August 1997, promoting her to the pay grade of E-5.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 7 December 1998. The application submitted in this case is dated 7 April 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. On 14 August 1992, she enlisted in the Army for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. She successfully completed her training as a medical specialist. She was promoted to the pay grade of E-2 on 1 February 1993, to the pay grade of E-3 on 1 September 1993, and to the pay grade of E-4 on13 October 1994. On 1 May 1995, she reenlisted in the Army for 4 years and she was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 1 September 1997.

4. On 16 April 1998, the Chief, Personnel Records Branch of Headquarters, United States Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort Bliss notified the Commander, Military Entrance Processing Section, Albuquerque, that an audit of the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket revealed discrepancies. The Chief, Personnel Records Branch requested that the applicant report to the personnel records branch by 18 May 1998, with orders for award of the Army Commendation Medal, orders for award of the Army Achievement Medal, orders awarding her a 91B2L primary military occupational specialty, a certificate of completion of PLDC and a copy of her current enlistment contract.

5. A review of the applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2A) reveals that she completed PLDC. However, the record is void of her dates of attendance.

6. On 7 December 1998, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, as a result of parenthood. She had completed 6 years, 3 months and 24 days of total active service.

7. The DD Form 214 that she was furnished at the time of her discharge fails to show that she completed PLDC or that she was awarded the NCO Professional Development Ribbon.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
:

1. The applicant’s contentions have been noted. However, she has failed to submit proper documentation with her application to show the dates that she attended the PLDC, which would also entitle her to the NCO Professional Development Ribbon.

2. The available evidence shows that she was notified of the discrepancies in her records and she was asked to provide the necessary documentation to update her records prior to her release from active duty.

3. There are no provisions by which entries can be made to a DD Form 214 without proper supporting documentation and in the absence of supporting evidence, her DD Form 214 cannot be amended.

4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 7 December 1998; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 6 December 2001. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

phm ____ ________ rwa_____ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ lem_____ ________ DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.




                  ____Lana E. McGlynn____
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003089907
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20040113
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 1021 100.0000.0000/ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER
2. 8 100.0700.0000/TRAINING
3. 46 107.0000.0000/AWARDS
4. 123 107.0077.0000/NCO PRO DEVEL RIBBON
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005620

    Original file (20110005620.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following awards: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to her DD Form 214 the: * Army Service Ribbon * NCO Professional Development Ribbon with Numeral 1 * Overseas Service Ribbon * Iraq Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars _______ _ __X_____...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028985

    Original file (20100028985.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Additionally, her records show she completed PLDC; therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show award of the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001790C070208

    Original file (20040001790C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 12 (Record of Service), item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized All Periods of Service), and item 14 (Military Education) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected. The applicant requested correction of her records to show award of the Army Achievement Medal. Army Regulation 635-5 states that the instructions for completing item 14 of the DD Form 214 are to enter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014334

    Original file (20140014334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record supports the applicant's request for correction of her DD Form 214 to show she attended PLDC. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062199C070421

    Original file (2001062199C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be amended to add the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and the Noncommissioned Officers Professional Development Ribbon (NCOPDR) in item 13 and the 1998 Mental Health Specialist course, the 4 week 1999 Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC), and Additional Skill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098139C070212

    Original file (03098139C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She would have had nearly 4 years of active service as a member of the United States Air Force, and 6 more months of active duty while serving in the Office, Chief Army Reserve between 1998 and 1999. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Department of the Army Circular 635-92-1, which outlines the policies and procedures for entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017532

    Original file (20110017532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows in: a. item 12f (Foreign Service) the entry "0000 00 00," indicating no foreign service during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214. b. item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Army Commendation Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal c. item 14 (Military Education) the entry "None//Nothing Follows." ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008308

    Original file (20130008308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver Bar * the Basic Leadership School Ribbon, i.e., the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon * the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 2. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement - Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record - Part...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014443

    Original file (20080014443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication or evidence in the applicant's records that she was enrolled in or completed Phase II of MOS 54B BNCOC as stipulated in her promotion orders. The evidence of record further shows the applicant was conditionally promoted to SSG/E-6 on 30 June 1998 in MOS 54B contingent upon her successful completion of BNCOC. With respect to the applicant's contention that she should be considered for promotion to SFC/E-7, there is no evidence that the applicant met grade and/or NCOES...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013770C070205

    Original file (20060013770C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, the removal of an Academic Evaluation Report (AER) (DA Form 1059) dated 11 March 1997 from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, absent evidence to show that the contested AER is improperly filed in her OMPF, there appears to be no basis to grant her request.