Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089566C070403
Original file (2003089566C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        

                  BOARD DATE: 30 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003089566

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Chairperson
Mr. Ernest W. Lutz Member
Mr. Larry C. Bergquist Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the rank listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) be changed from private/E-1 (PV1) to specialist four (SP4).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that rank on his DD Form 214 indicates PV1; however, his discharge certificate lists his rank as SP4. In support of his application, he provides a copy of his discharge certificate.

COUNSEL CONTENDS: In effect, that the applicant’s records are in error in that his DD Form 214 lists his rank as PV1 while his discharge certificate lists his rank as SP4.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 29 April 1980, he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty. He successfully completed basic training at Fort McClellan, Alabama and advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Lee, Virginia. Upon completion of AIT, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76C (Equipment Records and Parts Specialist).

The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows that he was promoted to SP4 in August 1981 and that this was the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. It also confirms that he was reduced to the rank of PV1 on 2 December 1982.

On 6 October 1982, while serving in Germany, the applicant departed from his unit without authority and was placed in an absent without leave (AWOL) status. He remained away until returning to military control on 9 October 1982.

On 1 December 1982, after having refused punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the applicant was tried by summary court-martial. He was found guilty of the charge of AWOL. The resultant sentence included 30 days of confinement at hard labor, reduction to PV1, and forfeiture of $191.00.

On 2 December 1982, the convening authority approved the sentence and ordered it to be duly executed. The convening authority also directed that the applicant be confined at the United States Army Retraining Brigade (USARB), Fort Riley, Kansas.


On 25 January 1983, the commander of the United States Army Correctional Activity (USACA), USARB, recommended that the applicant be separated under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance. On 7 February 1983, the separation authority directed the applicant’s release from active duty (REFRAD) and transfer to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) with his term of service characterized as general, under honorable conditions.

The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant confirms that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance. This document also confirms that he held the rank of PV1 on the date of his REFRAD. It also shows that at the time, he had completed a total of 2 years, 8 months, and 18 days of creditable active military service and he had accrued 23 days of time lost due to AWOL. The applicant authenticated this document with his signature in Item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated).

In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of a discharge certificate issued to him upon the completion of his USAR commitment on
28 April 1986. This document lists his rank as SP4; however, there are no official documents that show the applicant was promoted back to this rank while he was in the USAR.

Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. Chapter 2 contains item by item preparation instructions for the DD Form 214. The instructions for Item 4a (Rank) contained in the separation documents regulation that was in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation stated, in effect, that the rank the member held at the time of separation as determined by using the Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) would be entered in this item.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant’s contention that the rank listed on his DD Form 214 should be changed based on the rank listed on his discharge certificate was carefully considered. However, the evidence of record confirms that the applicant was reduced from the rank of SP4 to the rank of PV1 on 2 December 1982, as a result of a summary court-martial sentence.


2. The evidence also confirms that the applicant still held the rank of PV1 on the date of his REFRAD and transfer to the USAR. Further, he authenticated the
DD Form 214 with his signature, thereby verifying that the information contained therein, to include his rank, was correct at the time the document was prepared and issued. As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to change the rank currently entered on the DD Form 214 at this time.

3. The discharge certificate issued to the applicant upon the completion of his service obligation by the USAR lists his rank as SP4. However, there are no orders or other documents on file that give any indication that this rank entry was valid and it is concluded that the rank was listed in error. Given a correction to this document would not be favorable to the applicant, no change to the discharge document is being recommended.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__CLG__ __EL___ __LB____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003089566
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/10/DD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE GD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1983/02/09
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 C13
DISCHARGE REASON Unsatisfactory Performance
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 322 133.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068774C070402

    Original file (2002068774C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his rank, pay grade, and social security account number (SSAN) listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018200

    Original file (20100018200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Date of Birth), items 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade), and item 9d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). There is no evidence indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the reason for his separation within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011355

    Original file (20110011355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement * 20-Year Letter, dated 20 April 2000 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 June 1991 * Undated memorandum, subject: Enrollment in Phase I Course * Active duty order * 3 Certificates (Army Achievement Medal, Outstanding Dedicated Service, Honorable Discharge) * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 1 June 1998 * Released from active duty (REFRAD) order *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002065

    Original file (20150002065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002065 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his Honorable Discharge Certificate be corrected to show his rank as specialist four (SP4) instead of private first class (PFC). While the applicant was REFRAD in the rank of SP4, he was transferred to the USAR to complete his statutory military obligation and was subsequently reduced to the rank of PFC for unsatisfactory performance.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018123

    Original file (20100018123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows: a. on 2 March 1982 she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and she was ordered to active duty for split option training; b. from 24 May 1982 to 17 July 1982 she attended basic training at Fort Jackson, SC; c. in Orders Number 40-7, issued by the Military Entrance Processing Station, Nashville, TN, dated 25 February 1983, she was ordered to active duty to attend advanced individual training in MOS 72E; d. in Orders Number 106-143, issued by Headquarters,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316

    Original file (20080009316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015363

    Original file (20110015363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The record is void of documents or orders showing he was ever advanced above the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 subsequent to his 6 August 1976 reduction prior to his release from active duty (REFRAD). It stipulates the source records and documents for entries on the DD Form 214 are personnel qualification records and documents on file in the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017516

    Original file (20080017516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's records confirm he held the rank of PFC at the time of his REFRAD on 17 February 1983, and this is the rank properly reflected on the DD Form 214 he was issued upon his separation from active duty. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010167

    Original file (20050010167.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Larry W. Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) and Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) of his 12 May 1984 separation document (DD Form 214). Therefore, the time for his to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 16 May 1987.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013834

    Original file (20130013834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her rank as a Specialist Four (SP4). The applicant states, in effect, that her DD Form 214 shows her rank as a PV1; however, she was a SP4 when she was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Accordingly, a change in her rank is not authorized under the regulations governing the preparation of the DD Form 214 and there is no basis to grant her request.