Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015363
Original file (20110015363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
  
		BOARD DATE:	  7 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015363 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as private first class (PFC)/E-3 instead of private (PV1)/E-1.

2.  The applicant states he believes and knows his DD Form 214 is in error.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 November 1974.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 05F (Radio/
Teletype Operator).
3.  The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was advanced to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 1 April 1976, which was the highest rank/grade he held while serving on active duty.  It further shows he was reduced to PV1/E-1 effective 6 August 1976.  

4.  The record shows the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on the following three separate occasions for the offenses indicated:

* 25 April 1975, for dereliction of duty
* 6 August 1976, for disobeying a lawful order and breaking restriction
* 22 September 1976, for disorderly conduct 

5.  The record shows the punishment imposed on the applicant as a result of the 6 August 1976 NJP action included a reduction to PV1/E-1.  The record is void of documents or orders showing he was ever advanced above the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 subsequent to his 6 August 1976 reduction prior to his release from active duty (REFRAD).

6.  On 23 September 1976, a bar to reenlistment was approved on the applicant based on his record of NJP and record of counseling.

7.  Orders 73-1, issued by U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, dated 14 October 1976, directed the applicant’s REFRAD effective 10 November 1976 and transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training).  These orders listed the applicant’s grade as PV1 in the standard name line.

8.  On 10 November 1976, the applicant was honorably REFRAD after completing 2 years of total active service.  Item 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 6b (Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the entry PV1 and E-1, respectively.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It stipulates the source records and documents for entries on the DD Form 214 are personnel qualification records and documents on file in the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  The instructions for completing the rank and pay grade entries on the DD Form 214 are to enter the rank and pay grade held on the date of separation.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as PFC/E-3 has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was reduced to the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 as a result of NJP action on 6 August 1976.  All orders and documents prepared at the time of his separation confirm he held that rank/grade on the date of his REFRAD.  As a result, absent evidence indicating he was advanced to PFC/E-3 between 6 August 1976, the date of his reduction, and
10 November 1976, the date of his separation, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  _x_______  _____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015363



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015363



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008018

    Original file (20080008018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows, in Item 33 (Promotions and Reductions) that he was promoted to PFC on 13 September 1966, and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence submitted by the applicant that shows he was promoted to SP4 by proper authority while serving on active duty, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001660

    Original file (20090001660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He claims he served his final 18 months as a PV1 without getting into any trouble, and he was told by his first sergeant (1SG) that his rank would show up in his pay (twice); however, it never did. Item 21 (Time Lost) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows he accrued a total of 33 days of time lost due to two separate periods of AWOL (18 November through 2 December 1979 and 2 through 13 October 1980. It further shows that he was reduced to PV1/E-1 as a result of a court-martial conviction on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019450

    Original file (20090019450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13-4c of Army Regulation 635-200 with an under honorable conditions character of service. The evidence of record shows he accepted NJP on 26 March 1979 for various infractions that resulted in his reduction to PVT/E-1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000605

    Original file (20130000605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his pay grade as E-4 and award of the Safe Driver Medal. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was awarded the Safe Driver Medal. Therefore, the applicant could not have been awarded said medal during his active duty service and it is not authorized for entry on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102022C070208

    Original file (04102022C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Patrick McGann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as Private First Class (PFC), pay grade E-3, at the time he was discharged. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show that he was discharged on 16 March 1977 with the rank of PFC, pay grade E-3, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003470

    Original file (20130003470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant received NJP on 23 February 1972 and his punishment was, in part, reduction in pay grade to E-2 suspended for 60 days. The evidence of record shows the applicant was then reduced (by court-martial) to PV1 (E-1) on 20 May 1972. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was advanced or promoted in rank/grade at any time after he was reduced to PV1 (E-1) on 20 May 1972.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015624

    Original file (20080015624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 18 October 1974 (prepared), shows the applicant’s promotions and reductions. The active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation is entered in Item 6a and the effective date of promotion to the current pay grade (from the most recent promotion or reduction order) is entered in Item 6b. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017189

    Original file (20080017189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his rank as specialist four (SP4). Although the applicant's record is not complete regarding his record of promotions and reductions and there appears to be an administrative error in the date of rank listed in Item 7 (date of rank) of his DD Form 214, which shows his PFC date of rank as 2 June 1976, it is clear that his last reduction to PFC was the result of his misconduct in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316

    Original file (20080009316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019054

    Original file (20090019054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show: * his rank/pay grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 * award of the Purple Heart, Overseas Service Ribbon, Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Air Assault Badge * his ranger and special forces training 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military...