Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090730C070212
Original file (2003090730C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 16 October 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003090730


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Stephanie Thompkins Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. Member
Ms. Mae M. Bullock Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests promotion reconsideration to chief warrant officer four.

3. The applicant states that his records were incomplete and so a material error occurred. The result was that he was not promoted with his peers.

4. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer four by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. It was also determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered for promotion to chief warrant officer four and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). His officer evaluation reports for the periods ending 14 November 1997, 18 October 1998, 26 October 2000, 3 April 2001, and 3 April 2002 were not seen.

5. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant’s records were erroneously not considered for promotion to chief warrant officer four by the 2001 RCSB and should now be submitted for appropriate STAB consideration for this purpose.

2. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to chief warrant officer four by the 2002 RCSB and should now be submitted for appropriate STAB consideration for this purpose.

3. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by submitting the records of the individual concerned to a duly constituted STAB as deemed appropriate for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer four under 2001 criteria.

2. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be further corrected by placing the officer evaluation reports for the periods ending 14 November 1997, 18 October 1998, 26 October 2000, 3 April 2001 and 3 April 2002 on the OMPF of the individual concerned.
3. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his records be submitted to a duly constituted STAB under 2002 criteria, as appropriate.

4. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.

5. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.

BOARD VOTE:

_AAO___ _HOF____ _MMB__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Arthur A. Omartian___
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003090730
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031016
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.00
2. 131.01
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090217C070212

    Original file (2003090217C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when she was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089098C070403

    Original file (2003089098C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that the last officer evaluation report seen by the promotion board was for an annual training he completed in 1999. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090218C070212

    Original file (2003090218C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW3 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089108C070403

    Original file (2003089108C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 RCSB. A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083608C070212

    Original file (2003083608C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that due to no fault of his own, his officer evaluation report dated 10 April 2002 was not included in his promotion packet. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089113C070403

    Original file (2003089113C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086380C070212

    Original file (2003086380C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078620C070215

    Original file (2002078620C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon a review of the case by an official of the PERSCOM, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and not selected for promotion by the Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSBs) convening November to December in 1995,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089439C070403

    Original file (2003089439C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that all of his officer evaluation reports were not present for consideration by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to CW4 by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089465C070403

    Original file (2003089465C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his 1998 officer evaluation report was never forwarded for profiling and was not seen by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to...