Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063504C070421
Original file (2001063504C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 28 February 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001063504


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Celia L. Adolphi Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that her discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that she instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3. The applicant states that she told her unit on numerous occasions prior to the expiration of her term of service (ETS) that she desired to be retired. However, her unit allowed her to reach her ETS and discharged her instead. She goes on to state that her being discharged affects not only her benefits but her Retired Pay as well. She further states that given her training, she should be allowed to remain affiliated with the Reserves so that if the opportunity presents itself, she can be allowed to again serve her country.

4. The applicant’s military records show that she was promoted to the rank of master sergeant in the USAR on 26 October 1990.

5. On 30 September 1998, the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) notified the applicant (20-year letter) that she had completed the required years of service to be eligible for Retired pay at age 60 (6 December 2017).

6. On 27 April 1999, Headquarters, 95th Division in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, published orders number 117-05, which discharged the applicant from the USAR, effective 1 May 1999, on her ETS.

7. A review of the applicant’s records fails to reveal that any type of notification was dispatched to the applicant prior to her discharge, which explained what her options consisted of at the time.

8. Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR soldiers. Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

9. Army Regulation 135-178, in effect at the time, established the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the Reserve Components. Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud. After the effective date of discharge, orders could not be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or correct administrative errors such as errors concerning rank, social security number, or misspelled name.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s discharge was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

2. However, it appears that she was not afforded the opportunity to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. It is also reasonable to presume that given her qualifying years of creditable service for retired pay purposes, had she been afforded the opportunity prior to discharge, she would have elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct her military records by voiding her discharge of 1 May 1999, and assigning her to the Retired Reserve, effective the same date.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 1 May 1999 discharge from the USAR of the individual concerned; and by showing that she was transferred to the Retired Reserve, effective 1 May 1999.

BOARD VOTE:

___jm___ ___cla___ __rvo___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.__
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001063504
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/02/28
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 333 135.0100/TRAN RET RES
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056796C070420

    Original file (2001056796C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She further states that had she known this she would not have reenlisted for another 3 years. On 4 May 2000, the ARPERSCOM published orders discharging her from the USAR effective 10 May 2000. Therefore, the Board finds that her discharged orders should be revoked and that she be reinstated to her previous status in the USAR with credit for all drills (points only) that she earned during the appropriate retirement years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063260C070421

    Original file (2001063260C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge from the USAR should be voided and he should be issued orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the United States Naval Reserve (USNR) on 6 February 1964. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by revoking his discharge of 3 December 1992, and assigning him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079279C070215

    Original file (2002079279C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If a VSI recipient becomes ineligible to continue to serve in the Ready Reserve, through no fault of his or her own, the soldier will be transferred to the Retired Reserve and continue to receive annual VSI payments for the remaining period authorized for VSI. The Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070079C070402

    Original file (2002070079C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 17 March 1992 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 4 January 1992, the date his Retired Identification Card was issued. RECOMMENDATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061102C070421

    Original file (2001061102C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In pertinent part, it states that soldiers are authorized assignment to the Retired Reserve under several circumstances, including when the soldier is entitled to receive retired pay. Army Regulation 135-178 establishes policies governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the Army National Guard of the United States and the USAR. The evidence provided by the applicant shows that he requested transfer to the IRR, not the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065227C070421

    Original file (2001065227C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was retired by reason of being medically unfit for retention and that he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) at that time. This bulletin referenced an Under Secretary of Defense memorandum which established the policy prohibiting a service member who shows symptoms associated with Persian Gulf illness from being retired or separated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060711C070421

    Original file (2001060711C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    PROCEEDINGS BOARD DATE: 18 December 2001 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001060711 The applicant requests that her honorable discharge from the Reserve be voided and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant was eligible to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010366C070206

    Original file (20050010366C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Randolph Fleming | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 14 November 2003 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080022C070215

    Original file (2002080022C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from his United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit on 10 June 2001, approximately 8 months after he received his 20 -year letter. While the Board cannot ascertain why the applicant was not advised or why he was discharged after his ETS, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that given his qualifying years of creditable service for retired pay purposes, had he been afforded the opportunity prior to discharge, he would have elected to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069831C070402

    Original file (2002069831C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that while he was never counseled on the differences between discharge and transfer to the Retired Reserve, he elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 30 September 1988 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...