| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | Analyst |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Mr. John A. Kelley | Member |
2. The applicant request, in effect, promotion consideration by a standby advisory board (STAB) to the rank of chief warrant officer five under the 2002 criteria.
3. The applicant states that because of his incorrect mandatory removal date (MRD) he was not placed on the list before the 2002 promotion board. In support of his application he submits a copy of a letter notifying him of correction to his MRD.
4. The applicant’s military records show his date of birth as 3 March 1942.
5. He was appointed in the Reserve as a warrant officer one effective 9 June 1979. He attained the rank of chief warrant officer four effective 9 June 1995.
6. On 6 November 2001, the Chief, 99th Regional Support Team, Army Reserve Personnel Command advised the applicant that an administrative error had been made regarding his MRD. A recomputation of his maximum authorized years of service determined his correct MRD as 3 March 2004. His records have been updated to reflect this change.
7. Based on this corrective action the Office of Reserve Promotions determined that the applicant was erroneously omitted from promotion consideration to chief warrant officer five and it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer five by a STAB under 2002 criteria.
8. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration for warrant officers by a STAB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records were erroneously not considered for promotion to chief warrant officer five by the 2002 promotion board and should now be submitted for appropriate STAB consideration for this purpose.
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by submitting the records of the individual concerned to a duly constituted STAB as deemed appropriate for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five under 2002 criteria.
2. If the applicant is selected, his records should be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion. If the applicant is not selected, he should be so notified.
BOARD VOTE:
__TAP__ _RWA___ _JAK____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Thomas A. Pagan
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002078565 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030313 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.00 |
| 2. | 131.03 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079946C070215
The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by revoking his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR); effecting his promotion to colonel (COL); and extending his mandatory removal date (MRD). He claims that five years of commissioned service was denied him between 1 April 1990 and 5 November 1995. In the opinion of the Board, had the applicant been selected for promotion to COL by the 1997 promotion board, he would have been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090455C070212
The applicant states that he should have been selected for promotion to CW3 as there was no adverse or unfavorable information in his official military personnel file (OMPF) and he met all the fully qualified criteria to be selected for promotion. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082022C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was not considered for promotion by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW5 by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2002 criteria. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086380C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090730C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer four by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. It was also determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered for promotion to chief warrant officer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073471C070403
The applicant’s military records show that the applicant was commissioned as an officer in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 11 June 1972, at the age of 21 years. He should have been considered by the 1998 COL promotion board as well as the 1999 promotion board. Under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), if he is selected for promotion to COL under the 1998 or 1999 criteria, his MRD would be extended to 30 years of commissioned service resulting in an MRD of 10 July 2002.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064537C070421
DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: His contentions that the LA ARNG denied his request for an extension of his MRD and he was removed from the service and forced to retire in May 2000 after an Army STAB had selected him for promotion to lieutenant colonel have been noted by the Board; however, he did not lose any service time. The evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072156C070403
On March 6 th , he became a troop program unit member, but was not considered for the Reserve officer promotion due to his active duty records not being transferred to the Reserve component in a timely manner to be made available to the promotion board. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW3...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002330C070208
On 17 January 2003, the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command notified the New York ARNG of his selection for LTC and that his transfer to the Retired Reserve should be voided. The ABCMR, in docket number AR2003093661, noted that the applicant's original first nonselection for promotion to LTC precipitated his TERA application. The needs of the Army, rather than a member's retired pay status, is the determinant factor in whether that member may or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073057C070403
However, in this case, the applicant could not be selected based on the fact his 2000 record did not reflect completion of the required military education requirements (WOAC) by the convene date of the board. The applicant submitted an Application for Correction of Military Records (DD Form 149) requesting a STAB due to a Code 11, OER missing from his 2001 file. However, pertinent regulations do not specify that an OER Code 11, Promotion Report is required for subsequent promotion...