| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Sherri V. Ward | Member | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member |
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:
6. On 6 December 2001, the Board recommended that the applicant be considered by a standby advisory board for promotion consideration to chief warrant officer three under 2001 criteria.
7. The applicant was recommended for promotion to chief warrant officer three under 2001 criteria by a standby advisory board adjourning on 9 May 2002.
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:
3. At the time of the Board’s 6 December 2001 decision in this case, it was the intent of the Board to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time.
4. In view of the facts and circumstances surrounding this matter, the interest of justice would best be served by now correcting the Departmental records to show that the applicant was recommended for promotion to chief warrant officer three. The interest of justice would also be served by correcting the applicant’s records to show that his name was integrated onto the appropriate recommended list and that he was promoted to chief warrant officer three on his date of eligibility thereof, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited.
5. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to further correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be further corrected:
a. by showing the individual concerned was selected for promotion to chief warrant officer three under 2001 criteria; and
b by showing he was promoted to chief warrant officer three on his date of eligibility thereof, as determined by appropriate Departmental official
using the criteria cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090730C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer four by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. It was also determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered for promotion to chief warrant officer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090218C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW3 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078565C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based on this corrective action the Office of Reserve Promotions determined that the applicant was erroneously omitted from promotion consideration to chief warrant officer five and it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070984C070402
The applicant states that his records were not submitted for consideration for promotion to CW3 during the 2001 promotion board. He also states that his records were up to date and he is eligible and qualified for promotion. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW3 by a Standby Advisory Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070986C070402
The applicant states that the 2001 promotion board did not consider him. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW3 by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. He was erroneously not considered for promotion to CW3 by the 2001 Reserve Components Selection Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090455C070212
The applicant states that he should have been selected for promotion to CW3 as there was no adverse or unfavorable information in his official military personnel file (OMPF) and he met all the fully qualified criteria to be selected for promotion. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072156C070403
On March 6 th , he became a troop program unit member, but was not considered for the Reserve officer promotion due to his active duty records not being transferred to the Reserve component in a timely manner to be made available to the promotion board. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW3...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090217C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when she was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070332C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW3 by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. He was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089098C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that the last officer evaluation report seen by the promotion board was for an annual training he completed in 1999. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official...