Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073980C070403
Original file (2002073980C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 24 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002073980


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Beverly A. Young Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that Permanent Orders 192-35, dated 2 November 1993, which revoked the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, be removed from his Official Personnel Military File (OMPF).

3. The applicant states that the first award of the Good Conduct Medal was revoked because it was sent to him before he completed three years of qualifying service. He also states that he received the Good Conduct Medal in July 1996 as a correction to the Good Conduct Medal he received in 1993. He requests the revocation award to be removed from his permanent records. He states that the error was found at Division records in 2000. In support of his application, he submits five orders awarding him Good Conduct Medals and one revocation order.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he initially served in the U.S. Marine Corps from July 1985 to December 1989. He enlisted in the Army on 19 January 1990 and completed training as a food service specialist. He has continued to serve on active duty through a series of reenlistments and is currently assigned to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, in the rank of staff sergeant.

5. The applicant provided a copy of Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized) and Fort Stewart Permanent Orders Number 192-34, dated 2 November 1993. These orders awarded him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 January 1990 to 18 January 1993.

6. Records show that Permanent Orders Number 192-34, dated 2 November 1993, were placed in the commendatory data section of the applicant's OMPF.

7. The applicant also provided a copy of Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized) and Fort Stewart Permanent Orders Number 192-35, dated 2 November 1993, which revoked the applicant's first award of the Good Conduct Medal.

8. Records show that Permanent Orders Number 192-35, dated 2 November 1993, were placed in the service computation data section of the applicant's OMPF.

9. Headquarters, 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) and Fort Stewart published Permanent Orders Number 208-149, dated 26 July 1996, which awarded the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 January 1990 to 18 January 1993.

10. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management and Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records. Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is placed in the Official Military Personnel File it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file unless directed by: the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board, Army appeals board, Chief of Appeals and Corrections Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command, the Official Military Personnel File custodian when documents have been improperly filed, Total Army Personnel Command (TAPC-PDO-PO) as an exception, Chief of the Appeals Branch of the Army Reserve Personnel Center and Chief of the Appeals Branch of the National Guard Personnel Center.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 January 1990 to 18 January 1993 based on Permanent Orders Number 192-34, dated 2 November 1993.

2. The applicant's records contain Permanent Orders Number 192-35, dated 2 November 1993, which revoked his first award of the Good Conduct Medal.

3. The applicant's records also contain Permanent Orders Number 208-149, dated 26 July 1996, which restored the first award of the Good Conduct Medal originally awarded to the applicant by Permanent Orders Number 192-34, dated 2 November 1993.

4. The Board noted that the original award of the Good Conduct Medal to the applicant was valid and properly authorized by Permanent Orders Number 192-34, dated 2 November 1993.

5. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined:

         a. Permanent Orders Number 192-34, dated 2 November 1993, properly awarded the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal at the time in question.

         b. Permanent Orders Number 192-35, dated 2 November 1993, erroneously revoked the applicant's first award of the Good Conduct Medal and, therefore, these orders should be expunged from his records.

         c. Permanent Orders Number 208-149, dated 26 July 1996, erroneously restored his first award of the Good Conduct Medal and, therefore, these orders should be expunged from his records.

6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

a. by expunging Permanent Orders Number 192-35, dated 2 November 1993, from the OMPF of the individual concerned; and

b. by expunging Permanent Orders Number 208-149, dated 26 July 1996, from his OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

RVO____ BJE_____ KAH____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Raymond V. O'Connor___
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002073980
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20021024
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Schneider
ISSUES 1. 134.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086735C070212

    Original file (2003086735C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence confirms that the applicant’s OMPF contain orders which duplicate his award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 25 August 1996 to 24 August 1999. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by expunging the order issued on 17 July 2002 awarding him his fourth Army Good Conduct Medal which duplicates the award announced in 1999.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020094

    Original file (20080020094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 MAY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080020094 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the 24 November 1998 orders for his first award of the Good Conduct Medal be revoked and removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Charlie Detachment, 15th Personnel Services Battalion,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098802C070212

    Original file (03098802C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that orders showing award of the Army Good Conduct Medal be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by expunging Permanent Order 82-333, Charlie Detachment, 15th Personnel Services Battalion, dated 22 March 1996; and Permanent Order...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012669C070206

    Original file (20050012669C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of request: Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC) Memorandum, dated 26 August 2005, and eight AGCM award orders, seven orders revoking AGCM award orders and 1 order amending AGCM award orders. In this case, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was erroneously awarded his first AGCM for the period 4 December 1984 to 3 December 1986 even though he did not leave active duty. In this case, the EREC, as the records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206

    Original file (20050001440C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). There is no evidence contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award). | |DISCHARGE REASON | | |BOARD DECISION |GRANT | |REVIEW AUTHORITY | | |ISSUES 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206

    Original file (20050001440C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant provides no evidence. There is no evidence contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010726C071029

    Original file (20060010726C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal, and which were rescinded, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's request for removal of Permanent Orders 109-18 and Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award and 3rd Award), for an incorrect period of good conduct, from her OMPF, has merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082637C070215

    Original file (2002082637C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that there is an erroneous order on his OMPF for the Good Conduct Medal (GCM), as well as duplicates of the revocation orders for that award. He requests that the erroneous orders for the Good Conduct Medal as well as the associated duplicate revocation orders be removed from his records. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by removing from the applicant’s OMFP Orders 344-0040, dated 10 December 1999, and duplicates of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008304

    Original file (20080008304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Permanent Orders Number 84-01 and 84-03 dated 25 March 1999, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the 2nd and 3rd award be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). It is evident that the orders which the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061446C070421

    Original file (2001061446C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the document he wishes removed is a Disqualification for Award of the Army Good Conduct Medal memorandum dated 14 September 1993. He says that the same commander who directed filing of the memorandum of disqualification later awarded him an Army Good Conduct Medal for the same period. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by removing from the OMPF of the individual concerned the memorandum, Subject: Disqualification for...