Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063740C070421
Original file (2001063740C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 11 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001063740

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Ted S. Kanamine Chairperson
Mr. John T. Meixell Member
Mr. Harry B. Oberg Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be corrected to transfer to the Retired Reserve.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he had divorced his wife and she failed to forward his mail to him. Although he filed a change of address, he is confident that some of his mail was never forwarded to him.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was honorably separated from active duty in the rank of captain on 30 September 1992, with Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI), with 12 years, 2 months and 10 days of active duty. His separation was at his own request. In conjunction with his separation he completed a request for VSI, wherein he stated “I agree to serve in the Ready Reserve for the entire period VSI will be received.”

There is no record of the applicant joining a Reserve unit or otherwise participating in the Army Reserve. However, he was promoted to major, Army Reserve, on 9 April 1993.

On 9 May 2000 the applicant was notified that he was considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel but not selected, and he would be considered for promotion once again the following year.

There is no record of the applicant’s second failure to be selected for promotion, nor does his record contain his discharge order.

Army Regulation 135-133, paragraph 4-3b, states “Each soldier must furnish a permanent home address (home of record). When away from that permanent address for more than a month, the soldier will provide a temporary
[address] . . .”

Army Regulation 135-175, paragraph 4-4a(5), states that a major will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after a second consideration by a selection board.

Army Regulation 140-10, paragraph 6-1a(5), states that a member of the Army Reserve is eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve if he or she has reached the age of 37 and has completed a minimum of 8 years of qualifying Federal service.





The National Defense Authorization Act for FY92 established two monetary incentive programs to assist in maximizing voluntary separations during the draw down period of military forces. The two monetary incentives included the SSB, a lump sum payment equal to 15 percent of the soldier’s annual basic pay multiplied by his years of active service, and the VSI, an annual annuity payment equal to 2.5 percent of the soldier’s annual basic pay multiplied by his years of service and paid for twice the number of years served. The FY92 program provided that soldiers electing the SSB would not forfeit any SSB or compensation received if they subsequently served on active duty, or on reserve duty in a pay status. Additionally they were granted several non-monetary transition benefits including commissary and exchange privileges, employment preference in non-appropriated fund positions, and transitional health care (CHAMPUS or medical treatment facility). Soldiers electing to receive the VSI were denied those transitional benefits during the FY92 program. However, when the FY93 program was announced as part of the Defense Authorization Act of FY93 those disparities were equalized.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant acknowledged by his signature that he understood that he had to remain a member of the Ready Reserve to continue to receive VSI payments.

2. Army Regulation 135-155 requires all members of the Army Reserve who move from their home of record to notify their command of their new temporary or permanent address. The applicant failed to comply with this regulatory requirement.

3. While the applicant was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve, he was required to be discharged for failure to be promoted to lieutenant colonel if he did not request an alternate form of removal from an active status. He did not make any such request. As such, his discharge was appropriate.

4. While it is regrettable that the applicant lost his VSI payments, his loss was due to his failure to maintain even minimal contact with the appropriate commands in compliance with lawful regulations. His failure to maintain contact with the appropriate commands deprived the Government of the ability to call him to active duty. Under the equitable doctrine of laches, he may not now seek relief from his failure to attend to his own interest or to fulfill his commitment to the Government.




5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jtm____ ___tsk __ ___hbo__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001060421
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020711
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.02
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064450C070421

    Original file (2001064450C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect that he elected separation from active Army under the Variable Separation Incentive (VSI) Program instead of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) Program. Initially, only a non-monetary, voluntary separation program was announced providing retirement opportunities for some soldiers who had less than 20 but more than 15 years of active military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059544C070421

    Original file (2001059544C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on that credit, he further requests that his records be corrected to show that his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) be recalculated to account for the extra 4 years of service. The applicant states that his date of rank as a major was prior to the date he was released from active duty. As for the applicant’s request to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show that he was released from active duty as a major, the effective date of his promotion was well after his release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711601

    Original file (9711601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS : In effect, that his military records be corrected to show entitlement to a 15-year retirement (early retirement plan) or, as an alternative, that he requested and received a voluntary separation in support of the Army drawdown and entitlement to the voluntary separation incentive (VSI) in lieu of the fiscal year 1992 (FY92) reduction-in-force (RIF) selection for involuntary separation. The full separation pay authorized to those officers who were involuntarily separated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009778

    Original file (20090009778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged under the Fiscal Year 1992 (FY92) Enlisted Voluntary Early Transition Program with entitlement to the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI)/Special Separation Benefit (SSB). The applicant submitted the following documentary evidence in support of his request: a. a DA Form 4187, dated 26 February 1992, in which he requested voluntary separation under the provisions of Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 92-85. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510341C070209

    Original file (9510341C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel message dated 20 December 1991 that originally announced the VSIP to support the Army drawdown, stated, in pertinent part, that soldiers in the pay grade of E-4 (promotable) and below with more than 7 years of service as of 31 December 1991 could apply for separation under the VSIP during the period 1 January 1992 through 29 February 1992. The 20 December 1991 message also set forth the specific criteria for VSIP eligibility and provided the authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496

    Original file (20140011496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000801

    Original file (20100000801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired under the 15-year early retirement program instead of honorably discharged under the Fiscal Year 1992 (FY92) Enlisted Voluntary Transition Program. The applicant states he had over 15 years of creditable active service and was not offered the early retirement program as an option at the time he elected separation under the FY92 Enlisted Voluntary Transition Program. It provided that Soldiers whose application for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059910C070421

    Original file (2001059910C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be reinstated in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) as a captain and that his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) program benefits be restored. At the same time, the applicant stated that he also received a letter from the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) informing him that he could request resignation. As a matter of justice and exception to policy, his 9 September 1998 discharge from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605716C070209

    Original file (9605716C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military record be corrected to reflect separation under the Early Retirement Program versus separation with the Special Separation Bonus (SSB). The evidence of record shows that the applicant, who was not facing any involuntary separation action, elected to participate in a voluntary early transition program which paid him more than $57,000 in separation pay. Had he not voluntarily participated in the SSB program and remained on active duty he would not have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057042C070420

    Original file (2001057042C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show he was separated under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) and not the Special Separation Benefit (SSB). The applicant states, in effect, that he initially requested separation under the VSI but changed his mind at the Fort Dix, NJ separation and transfer point and requested the SSB. His DD Form 214, item 18 shows he was authorized the SSB.