Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059544C070421
Original file (2001059544C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:

         BOARD DATE: 25 September 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059544


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests active duty credit for the time he spent as a Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP) cadet. Based on that credit, he further requests that his records be corrected to show that his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) be recalculated to account for the extra 4 years of service. In addition, he requests that his separation documents be corrected to reflect that he had been promoted to major prior to his release from active duty.

3. The applicant states that his date of rank as a major was prior to the date he was released from active duty. As for his ROTC credit, the SMP was modified in 1996 to allow the time served in the ROTC/SMP to count towards retirement and time in service. Based on that change, his Basic Active Service Date (BASD) should be corrected from September 1984 to August 1980.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he executed a non-scholarship advanced course ROTC contract on 28 August 1980. He enlisted in the ARNG in pay grade E-1 on 29 September 1980. On 10 June 1983 he was discharged from his status as a ROTC/SMP cadet to accept a commission in the ARNG.

5. On 13 September 1984 the applicant entered on extended active duty as a reserve officer in a commissioned status. He was given the area of concentration of communications officer and was promoted to the rank of captain.

6. On 1 June 1995 the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group, at his own request, with annual VSI payments of $11,037.26. He had 10 years, 8 months and 19 days of active service during that period, and had 6 months and 23 days of prior active service.

7. On 15 September 1996 the Army Reserve Command published orders promoting the applicant to major with an effective date of 5 June 1996, and a date of rank of 24 May 1995.

8. Public Law (PL) 104-201, Section 507, dated 23 September 1996, amended the provisions of law to provide service credit to officers commissioned from the ROTC advanced course program who also participated in the SMP, retroactive to 1 August 1979 when the SMP was established. The law specifies that these PEBD adjustments will not be grandfathered for pay, that any adjustment of a soldier’s PEBD will only entitle him or her to an increase in pay from the date the law was passed. The SMP service credit affects only the PEBD for pay purposes. It does not affect the Basic Active Duty Date (BASD), Basic Date of Appointment (BDA), or Date of Rank (DOR) for officers.



9. The National Defense Authorization Act for FY92 established two monetary incentive programs to assist in maximizing voluntary separations during the drawdown period of military forces. The two monetary incentives included the SSB, a lump sum payment equal to 15 percent of the soldier’s annual basic pay multiplied by his years of active service, and the VSI, an annual annuity payment equal to 2.5 percent of the soldier’s annual basic pay multiplied by his years of service and paid for twice the number of years served. The FY92 program provided that soldiers electing the SSB would not forfeit any SSB or compensation received if they subsequently served on active duty, or on reserve duty in a pay status. Additionally they were granted several non-monetary transition benefits including commissary and exchange privileges, employment preference in non-appropriated fund positions, and transitional health care (CHAMPUS or medical treatment facility). Soldiers electing to receive the VSI were denied those transitional benefits during the FY92 program. However, when the FY93 program was announced as part of the Defense Authorization Act of FY93 those disparities were equalized.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant served in the ROTC/SMP and is now entitled to have that service credited to him effective the date the law was passed, 23 September 1996.

2. Since the applicant was released from active duty prior to the enactment of
PL 104-201, the law did not affect how his VSI was calculated, nor does the law affect an officer’s BASD.

3. As for the applicant’s request to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show that he was released from active duty as a major, the effective date of his promotion was well after his release from active duty. In addition, his promotion to major was not on the Active Duty List (ADL). Therefore, although the applicant was a reserve officer on active duty, his ADL rank was properly captain at the time he was released from active duty.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:

a. crediting to the individual concerned the time he served in the ROTC/SMP in accordance with PL 104-201; and

b. paying to him the difference of pay he would have received as a result of this correction, for service performed after 23 September 1996.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

___le____ ____jns_ ___reb___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __________John E. Denning______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059544
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010925
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.09
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054500C070420

    Original file (2001054500C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He participated in the SMP as member of the Louisiana State University ROTC and the ARNG from 24 August 1978 until his commissioning on 30 May 1980. Public Law (PL) 104-201, Section 507, dated 23 September 1996, amended the provisions of the law to provide service credit to officers commissioned from the ROTC Advanced Course program who also participated in the SMP, retroactive to 1 August 1979 when the SMP began. BOARD VOTE : _jh__ _tfb_ jtm__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067761C070402

    Original file (2002067761C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show he participated in the SMP as a member of the Middle Tennessee State University ROTC and the ARNG from 14 October 1985 until his commissioning on 8 May 1987. On 14 October 1985, the applicant enlisted in the Tennessee ARNG. Public Law (PL) 104-201, Section 507, dated 23 September 1996, amended the provisions of the law to provide service credit to officers commissioned from the ROTC Advanced Course program who also participated in the SMP, retroactive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060226C070421

    Original file (2001060226C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an earlier advisory it was noted that the applicant’s records did not contain a DA Form 4824-R (SMP Contract) or orders that discharged him from ROTC to enroll in the SMP. It was determined that the applicant’s PEBD and Basic Active Service Date is 9 May 1986 and that his DIEMS date is 3 July 1984. Public Law (PL) 104-201, Section 507, dated 23 September 1996, amended the provisions of the law to provide service credit to officers commissioned from the ROTC Advanced Course program who...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087251C070212

    Original file (2003087251C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her pay entry basic date (PEBD) as 29 August 1988 and her basic active service date (BASD) as 16 February 1989. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083006C070215

    Original file (2002083006C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence that the applicant enlisted as an ROTC/SMP cadet. The law that grants service credit for SMP participation specifically limits this credit to SMP cadets. case, without evidence that the applicant was contracted to be an SMP participant, and was not made an SMP participant due to an error or injustice, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013261

    Original file (20080013261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DARP Form 249 (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) to show retirement points credit for service performed as a senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps program (ROTC) cadet from 26 August 1946 to 27 May 1949. The applicant's record is void of his ROTC enlistment contract; however, Item 18 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows that the applicant completed: a. his first year of ROTC at the University of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007505

    Original file (20060007505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he requests that his records be corrected to show his service in the SMP while serving in the United States Army Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) and the United States Army National Guard. Evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 3 September 1980 but was not assigned as an ROTC cadet in MOS 09R20 until 1 December 1980. There is no evidence that the applicant performed any active duty service during the time he was granted SMP credit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063740C070421

    Original file (2001063740C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be corrected to transfer to the Retired Reserve. His failure to maintain contact with the appropriate commands deprived the Government of the ability to call him to active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015586

    Original file (20100015586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provides his April 2010 LES which shows his PEBD (Pay Entry Basic date) as 3 February 1976 (the date he initially enlisted in the USAR) and that he was receiving pay based on 34 years of total service. Section 010101 (service which is creditable) states for most members who enter and serve on active duty without a break in service, the basic pay date is the date the member enters active or inactive service. d. Section 010103A(2) (Creditable Prior Enlisted Service) states...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710131

    Original file (9710131.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his pay entry basic date (PEBD) be adjusted due to his membership in the Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP). On 31 August 1994, he retired from the Regular Army, in pay grade O-4, after 20 years of creditable active federal service (20 years, 10 months and 10 days for basic pay).4. If the credit results in a higher basic pay due to a change in the PEBD, the effective date of the increase will be 23 September 1996.