| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show he was separated under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) and not the Special Separation Benefit (SSB).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he initially requested separation under the VSI but changed his mind at the Fort Dix, NJ separation and transfer point and requested the SSB. He was told he should not have been allowed to change his mind. He has paid back the monies he received under the SSB (verified by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Denver Center on 22 June 2001).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 October 1982.
5. On 15 January 1992, the applicant requested separation under the VSI. His request was approved and separation orders were issued showing he was approved for VSI payment.
6. Apparently when the applicant arrived at the Fort Dix separation and transfer point he changed his request from the VSI to the SSB and was given a lump sum SSB payment of $18,936.27 (taxes deducted). On 24 August 1992, the applicant was separated after completing 9 years, 9 months, and 28 days of creditable active service and was transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR). His DD Form 214, item 18 shows he was authorized the SSB. Items 26, 27, and 28 show that he was given a separation code of KCB (discharge with SSB), a reentry code of 3S (separation with SSB), and a narrative reason for separation of Voluntary Early Transition Program (SSB). (Separation under the VSI would have given him a separation code of KCA and a reentry code of 3V.) He enlisted in the USAR on 25 August 1992 for 3 years.
7. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1992 established voluntary incentive programs to support the Army drawdown. Under the SSB, an eligible member of the armed forces would receive a lump sum payment equal to 15 percent of the soldier’s annual basic pay multiplied by his years of active service. Soldiers who applied for this incentive were required to enter into a written agreement to serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less than 3 years, in addition to any remaining military service obligation based in statute, following the separation from active duty. The VSI was an annual annuity payment equal to 2.5 percent of the soldier’s annual basic pay multiplied by his years of service and paid for twice the number of years served. Soldiers approved for VSI must have been appointed, enlisted, or transferred to the Ready Reserve for the entire period they received VSI annual payments.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s DD Form 214 is incorrect. He had received an approved separation under the VSI. He should not have been allowed to change his mind at the separation and transfer point to receive the SSB lump sum payment. The Government has since recouped its overpayment. Although the applicant could have been authorized VSI payments for as long as 18 years, it appears payments stopped after 3 years, upon his expiration term of service in the USAR, as governed by law.
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the applicant’s DD Form 214:
a. item 18 be amended to delete the entry pertaining to the SSB and to show he was authorized Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI);
b. item 26 be amended to read KDA;
c. item 27 be amended to read 3V; and
d. item 28 be amended to read Voluntary Early Transition Program (VSI).
BOARD VOTE:
__mdm___ __le____ __gjw___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Mark D. Manning
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001057042 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010719 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508891C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to show that he elected the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) option in lieu of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option offered under the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP). Service members who were approved for the VSIP had the option of receiving either the VSI or the SSB. On 5 June 1992 he submitted a request to change his election to separate under the SSB option instead of the VSI option.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508451C070209
As a second alternative, he requests correction of his military records to show that he elected the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) option in lieu of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option offered under the VSIP. Service members who were approved for the VSIP had the option of receiving either the VSI or the SSB. Further, the PERSCOM noted that case that the approval of the applicants request for the SSB option and the implementation of the legislatively amended VSI benefits...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064450C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect that he elected separation from active Army under the Variable Separation Incentive (VSI) Program instead of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) Program. Initially, only a non-monetary, voluntary separation program was announced providing retirement opportunities for some soldiers who had less than 20 but more than 15 years of active military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507983C070209
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he separated from the service with entitlement to the voluntary separation incentive (VSI) option of the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP) instead of the special separation benefit (SSB) option he received. However, at the time of separation, he received payment under the SSB option. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606149C070209
APPLICANT STATES: That at the time he requested separation under the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option of the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP), he was informed that he could request a waiver of recoupment of approximately $9,000.00 he still owed (in lieu of completing his active duty service obligation (ADSO)) for having participated in an advanced civil schooling program. Furthermore, he was advised that the law did not allow for a waiver of reimbursement for advance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496
It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509392C070209
The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, inasmuch as he separated from active duty under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) Program (VSIP), he is obligated to remain in the USAR in some capacity as a condition of receiving his annual VSI payments. Although it is a requirement for USAR soldiers to request transfer to the Retired Reserve or another USAR Control Group in lieu of being...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508228C070209
The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he was separated under the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP) and that he receive all entitlements authorized under the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option. The applicant states that he originally applied for separation under the Voluntary Early Transition (VET) Program. However, before he was separated, the VSIP was announced and he was afforded the opportunity to apply for separation under the SSB option of the VSIP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506342C070209
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant enlisted on 5 November 1984 for a period of 3 years. Although not explained in the available records, orders were published on 25 June 1991 which authorized the applicant to separate from the service prior to his ETS, on 28 November 1991, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, and considering that there were no early release programs announced at the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066484C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 31 August 1992, he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve for 3 years. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: 1.