APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military record be corrected to reflect separation under the Early Retirement Program versus separation with the Special Separation Bonus (SSB).
APPLICANT STATES: He was separated from active duty in August 1992 after electing to accept a lump sum separation payment (SSB). He notes at the time of his separation there was no early retirement program but had there been he would have taken the early retirement not the lump sum payment.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He served on active duty between February 1976 and August 1992. He was promoted to pay grade E-7 in March 1985 and held specialty 63E (Abrams Tank System Repairman) at the time of his release from active duty with nearly 17 years of active federal service.
On 4 August 1992 the applicant was voluntarily separated from active duty with an honorable characterization of service and transferred to the Army Reserve in pay grade
E-7. He received an SSB lump-sum payment of $57,640.23.
In December 1991 Department of the Army disseminated information regarding Voluntary Separation Incentive Programs available to soldiers who were fully qualified for retention but who voluntarily separated. The announcement message noted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY92, Congress has approved two voluntary incentive programs to assist in maximizing voluntary separations during the drawdown. Implementation instructions for the voluntary separation incentive programs were announced by Department of the Army on 7 January 1992. The two monetary separation incentives associated with the voluntary release program included the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) and the Special Separation Bonus (SSB).
The FY93 Defense Authorization Act, enacted on 1 September 1992, enabled the service secretaries to implement an early retirement program (commonly referred to as the 15 year retirement program) if deemed necessary.
In April 1993 Department of the Army announced implementation of an early retirement program to provide a temporary management tool to reshape the Army through FY95. The implementation message noted that early retirement is not an entitlement, and it will only be offered to soldiers and officers who meet the strict eligibility requirements and that individuals who have already separated under provisions of any other voluntary or involuntary separation program are not eligible for early retirement.
The temporary early retirement authority was intended to be used to retire members whose skills are excess to the Armys short term and long term needs. Although the early retirement program window was opened to individuals in several military specialties, grades and years of service the applicants specialty (63E) was not announced for participation until the FY95 program was implemented.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, who was not facing any involuntary separation action, elected to participate in a voluntary early transition program which paid him more than $57,000 in separation pay.
2. Had he not voluntarily participated in the SSB program and remained on active duty he would not have been eligible for early retirement until the FY95 program was announced.
3. Just as individuals who separated prior to the implementation of the SSB/VSI program, individuals who separated prior to the early retirement program are prohibited from restoration to active duty for the purpose of receiving an enhanced monetary separation benefit.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
5. There is no evidence of error or injustice in the applicants case and he was properly separated, per his request, under the FY92 Voluntary Separation Incentive Program.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064450C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect that he elected separation from active Army under the Variable Separation Incentive (VSI) Program instead of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) Program. Initially, only a non-monetary, voluntary separation program was announced providing retirement opportunities for some soldiers who had less than 20 but more than 15 years of active military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000013
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired under the 15-year early retirement program instead of honorably discharged under the Fiscal Year 1992 (FY92) Enlisted Voluntary Transition Program. It provided, in pertinent part, that Soldiers whose application for separation under the Voluntary Separation Incentive/Special Separation Benefit (VSI/SSB) programs was approved on or after 3 May 1993 could not convert to early retirement unless they were currently on active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711601
APPLICANT REQUESTS : In effect, that his military records be corrected to show entitlement to a 15-year retirement (early retirement plan) or, as an alternative, that he requested and received a voluntary separation in support of the Army drawdown and entitlement to the voluntary separation incentive (VSI) in lieu of the fiscal year 1992 (FY92) reduction-in-force (RIF) selection for involuntary separation. The full separation pay authorized to those officers who were involuntarily separated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510341C070209
The Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel message dated 20 December 1991 that originally announced the VSIP to support the Army drawdown, stated, in pertinent part, that soldiers in the pay grade of E-4 (promotable) and below with more than 7 years of service as of 31 December 1991 could apply for separation under the VSIP during the period 1 January 1992 through 29 February 1992. The 20 December 1991 message also set forth the specific criteria for VSIP eligibility and provided the authority...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009778
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged under the Fiscal Year 1992 (FY92) Enlisted Voluntary Early Transition Program with entitlement to the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI)/Special Separation Benefit (SSB). The applicant submitted the following documentary evidence in support of his request: a. a DA Form 4187, dated 26 February 1992, in which he requested voluntary separation under the provisions of Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 92-85. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508451C070209
As a second alternative, he requests correction of his military records to show that he elected the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) option in lieu of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option offered under the VSIP. Service members who were approved for the VSIP had the option of receiving either the VSI or the SSB. Further, the PERSCOM noted that case that the approval of the applicants request for the SSB option and the implementation of the legislatively amended VSI benefits...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000801
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired under the 15-year early retirement program instead of honorably discharged under the Fiscal Year 1992 (FY92) Enlisted Voluntary Transition Program. The applicant states he had over 15 years of creditable active service and was not offered the early retirement program as an option at the time he elected separation under the FY92 Enlisted Voluntary Transition Program. It provided that Soldiers whose application for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063740C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be corrected to transfer to the Retired Reserve. His failure to maintain contact with the appropriate commands deprived the Government of the ability to call him to active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606149C070209
APPLICANT STATES: That at the time he requested separation under the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option of the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP), he was informed that he could request a waiver of recoupment of approximately $9,000.00 he still owed (in lieu of completing his active duty service obligation (ADSO)) for having participated in an advanced civil schooling program. Furthermore, he was advised that the law did not allow for a waiver of reimbursement for advance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496
It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...