| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge orders be revoked and he be placed in the Retired Reserve with all its attendant benefits, to include but not limited to the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
3. The applicant states that he received his 20-year letter in August 2000. In November 2000, he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve. Due to an administrative error he was honorably discharged instead. Due to false information he did not enroll in the SBP. Supporting evidence is as listed on the DD Form 149.
4. The applicant's military records show that he was born on 29 November 1960. After having had prior service, he enlisted in the Regular Army in July 1981. He was released from active duty in September 1992 under the Enlisted Voluntary Early Transition Program and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR). On 8 July 1995, he reenlisted in the USAR in a Troop Program Unit for 6 years making his expiration term of service (ETS) 7 July 2001.
5. The applicant’s notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 31 August 2000. Paragraph 4 states in part “…By law, you have only 90 calendar days from the date you receive this memo to submit your DD Form 1883, Survivor Benefit Plan-Election Certificate. If you do not submit your election within 90 calendar days, you will not be entitled to survivor benefit coverage until you apply for retired pay at age 60…”
6. On 14 April 2001, the applicant completed and signed a Request for Reserve Component Assignment or Attachment, DA Form 4651-R, requesting transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). Assignment orders assigning him to the IRR are not available.
7. Orders 184-019L, Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command dated 3 July 2001 discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 7 July 2001, his ETS.
8. Army Regulation 140-10 prescribes policies to assign, remove, or transfer USAR soldiers. In pertinent part, it states that soldiers are authorized assignment to the Retired Reserve under several circumstances, including when the soldier is entitled to receive retired pay. Eligible soldiers must request transfer.
9. Army Regulation 135-178 establishes policies governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the Army National Guard of the United States and the USAR. In pertinent part it states that upon ETS, the soldier will be discharged by the separation authority.
10. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence of Government error in this case. The evidence provided by the applicant shows that he requested transfer to the IRR, not the Retired Reserve. This request may not have been acted upon as he was less than 3 months away from his ETS of 7 July 2001. His ETS came up, there is no evidence to show he extended or attempted to extend his enlistment, and by regulation he was required to be discharged.
2. However, the Board notes that the applicant will not be eligible for retired pay for another 18 or 19 years. It would be in the Government’s interest to transfer him to the Retired Reserve where he could be a mobilization asset for a reasonable length of time to come.
3. The applicant provides no evidence to show that he was given “false information” concerning SBP enrollment. His 20-year letter was very clear in stating he had 90 days from receipt of the letter to make his SBP election or else wait until he applied for retired pay at age 60.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. revoking Orders 184-019L, Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command dated 3 July 2001 discharging the applicant from the USAR effective 7 July 2001, and
b. publishing orders assigning the applicant to the Retired Reserve effective 7 July 2001.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__rvo___ __rks___ __dph___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001061102 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011016 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 135.03 |
| 2. | 137.04 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021766
Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the members 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant contends that the FSM's military records should be corrected to show she is eligible to receive an SBP annuity when the FSM...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069754C070402
Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The applicant was married to the FSM for over 20 years of his military career. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s election to participate in the RCSBP retroactive to the date of his death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076772C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for former spouse coverage. On 10 August 1992, he completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount, option C. He named the applicant as his spouse and indicated they were...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060258C070421
Records at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) indicate the FSM was mailed a retirement application packet on 8 June 1999 but they have no record of it being returned either as undeliverable or completed for certification. The evidence of record shows that the FSM never applied for retired pay. Although records at AR-PERSCOM show that he was mailed his retired pay application two years prior to his reaching age 60, there was no requirement that he submit the application...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004712
The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period 17 July 1974 to 14 July 1978 * Marriage License for the FSM and applicant, dated 8 July 1989 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter), dated 16 September 1996 * Memorandum, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Personnel Command, subject: Expiration Term of Service (ETS), dated 16 May 1998 * U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Form 249 (Chronological Statement of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013439
The applicant provides: * self-authored statements * letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Fort Knox, KY, dated 25 June 2013 * DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), dated 26 April 1995 * two death certificates * DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity) * birth certificate * DD Form 2790 (Custodianship Certificate to Support Claim on Behalf of Minor Children of Deceased Members of the Armed Forces), dated 10 June 2013 * DD Form 2788 (Child...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064851C070421
The Board finds the applicant’s contention that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 reasonable. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 on 1 November 2000, electing to participate in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage, full base amount, option C, and returned the form to the appropriate office where it was received and processed in a timely manner. That the applicant be paid an RCSBP annuity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070460C070402
The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay and enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. The applicant states the FSM was not briefed when he retired from the U. S. Army Reserve. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the FSM applied for retired pay on 1 September 1999, naming the applicant as his beneficiary for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005391
Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement and participation in SBP, but were not yet age 60, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Although the FSM had qualified for a reserve retirement, he died prior to reaching age 60. As the FSM was not receiving retired pay this paragraph of the letter was not applicable in her case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076477C070215
The applicant’s military records are not complete, however, the available records show that he enlisted in the USAR on 11 August 1970. The applicant’s records contain a copy of Headquarters, 143D Transportation Command Orders 96-270-018, dated 26 September 1996, which shows that the applicant was involuntary transferred to the IRR for unsatisfactory participation and reassigned to the USAR Control Group (REINF) effective the same day. b. by issuing orders that transferred the applicant to...