| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was retired by reason of being medically unfit for retention and that he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) at that time.
3. The applicant states that the FSM was discharged from the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) effective September 1998. On 19 January 1999, he was informed that he would be separated as being medically unfit for retention. He was not afforded the opportunity to retire.
4. The FSM’s military records show that he was born on 26 June 1956. After having had prior service in the Regular Army, he enlisted in the ARNG on 30 September 1982. He was called to active duty during Operation Desert Shield/Storm from 12 September 1990 through 12 July 1991.
5. On 9 March 1995, the ALARNG informed the FSM that, although he was not cleared by a Medical Duty Review Board (MDRB), he could not be separated due to guidance outlined in a Department of the Navy bulletin. This bulletin referenced an Under Secretary of Defense memorandum which established the policy prohibiting a service member who shows symptoms associated with Persian Gulf illness from being retired or separated unless the member requested retirement or separation in writing or the member can be medically retired or separated through the disability system with an established diagnosis recognized by the Veterans Affairs Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD).
6. On 10 December 1998, the FSM was discharged from the ARNG upon the expiration of his term of service (ETS) effective 29 September 1998. There is no evidence of record to show that the FSM requested this separation in writing. His Retirement Points History Statement shows that he had completed exactly 16 years of qualifying service for a nonregular retirement as of 29 September 1998, the last 13 of which were served in a Reserve Component.
7. By memorandum dated 19 January 1999, the ALARNG informed the FSM that an MDRB recommended he be separated from the ARNG as medically unfit for retention. The FSM apparently never received or never returned his concurrence/nonconcurrence statement.
8. The FSM died on 24 February 2000.
9. By memorandum dated 20 July 2001, The Adjutant General, ALARNG stated that the FSM was discharged due to an oversight of the ALARNG. He should not have been discharged upon his ETS since his unit had previously requested an MDRB on him and he should have been retained in the ARNG until the medical board was completed. As of January 1999, the FSM had 16 years of qualifying service towards retired pay at age 60 and should have been issued a notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60.
10. Public Law 106-65, enacted 5 October 1999, amended chapter 1223 (Retired Pay for Non-Regular Service) of Title 10, U. S. Code by adding section 12731b. Section 12731b(a) states that a member of the Selected Reserve who no longer meets the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member is unfit because of physical disability may, for the purposes of section 12731 (Age and Service Requirements) of this title, be treated as having met the service requirements and be provided with the notification required if he has completed at least 15 and less than 20 years of service.
11. The authority provided by section 12731b, Title 10, U. S. Code (Public Law 103-337) existed as a force reduction/transition initiative in section 12731a(c)(3) for the period beginning 1 October 1991 and ending 30 September 2001 for those members who completed at least 15 years of service. The individual must also have met the requirement of having performed the last 6 years of qualifying service in the Reserve Components as outlined in Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1331(a). The intent of the new subsection was to make the authority permanent.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. It appears the FSM was considered by an MDRB in 1995 and not medically cleared. Because he was a Gulf War veteran, he should not have been separated at his ETS without his written consent. It does not appear that he gave that written consent yet he was discharged upon his ETS. In January 1999, one month after he was notified he was discharged, he was determined to be medically unfit for retention.
2. The FSM had completed more than 15 years of qualifying service towards Reserve Component retired pay at age 60 at the time he was found to be medically disqualified for continued service in the Army National Guard. Public Laws 103-337 and 106-65 provide retirement eligibility for individuals in the FSM’s situation. It would be appropriate to show that he was retired under the provisions of those laws.
3. It appears the FSM had a long-standing illness possibly related to his service during the Gulf War. The Board concludes that it would be reasonable to conceive that he would have elected to enroll in the RCSBP to provide financial protection to his spouse, the applicant.
4. In view of the foregoing, the FSM’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. voiding the FSM’s discharge of 29 September 1998 and showing that he was retained in the service pending completion of his physical disability processing;
b. showing that the FSM was separated from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army by reason of medical unfitness effective 31 January 1999;
c. showing that on 1 February 1999 the FSM was transferred to the Retired Reserve with entitlement to Reserve retired pay/benefits at age 60 under the provisions of Public Laws 103-337 and 106-65; and
d. showing that the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse coverage, full base amount, option C at the time of his transfer to the Retired Reserve.
BOARD VOTE:
__rvp___ __jpi___ __rks___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001065227 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020307 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 108.00 |
| 2. | 136.03 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069796C070402
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he received a 15-year letter due to being medically unfit for retention and that he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) at that time. The applicant states that the FSM had over 18 years of service and was not properly taken care of. The litigation attorney for the NGB opined that had the FSM received a quadrennial retention physical in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066635C070402
The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter). Based upon the listed causes of his death, it appears his death may have been related to his radical prostatectomy surgery. That the applicant be paid the RCSBP annuity retroactive to 17 November 2001, the date of the FSM’s death, as a result of the above corrections.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059669C070421
The applicant requests a reconsideration of his application to correct his records to show that he was authorized a Reserve early retirement based upon physical disability. The staff of the Board has determined that the applicant’s submissions show a manifest error that requires Board review. Army Regulation 135-155, paragraph 4-29, states that a member, whose removal from active Reserve status is required by law, must be removed within the prescribed time limits unless eligible for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087263C070212
Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(f)(1)(B) states that the Secretary concerned shall pay an annuity to the surviving spouse of a person who is eligible to provide a reserve component annuity and who dies during the 90-day period beginning on the date the person receives notification under section 12731(d) of this title that he has completed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005457
The FSM had a total of 19 years, 9 months, and 2 days of creditable service for non-regular retired pay; however, he had only 3 years of creditable Reserve component service [the NGB advisory opinion states 3 years, 11 months, and 9 days from 24 January 1995 through 1 January 1999 however, only 3 years were actually creditable]. Unfortunately, the GAARNG only transferred the applicant to the Retired Reserve; they did not actually process him for early retirement under the provisions of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077517C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 March 1999 – 29 February 2000. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013131
On 2 June 2003, the FSM was issued a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, required that upon receipt of that letter, a qualified RC member, who was married, would automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under option C, spouse and child(ren) coverage based on full retired pay, unless different coverage was selected within 90 days of receipt of that letter. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011636
The GAARNG should have placed the FSM in the Retired Reserve for medical reasons and issued him a 15-year letter. The evidence of record shows the FSM was discharged from the GAARNG on 2 July 1991 by reason of medical unfitness. He was discharged from the Selected Reserve effective July 1991, over a year before the authority to issue 15-year letters was enacted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012755
The applicant requests reconsideration of her request to have the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), corrected to show that he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004939
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for immediate spouse coverage (Option C) and that she be provided a SBP annuity based on the FSM's death. The FSM's records were lost by the ILARNG and are not available through the NPRC, which would indicate that even if the FSM had properly completed and submitted a DD Form 1883 within 90 days of...