| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be changed to former spouse coverage.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that although the divorce decree granted his former spouse the SBP he was under the impression he could not change his SBP election. He learned he could do so after the one-year window of opportunity to do so had passed.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 January 1970. He retired on 1 February 1990. At that time he enrolled in the SBP for spouse only coverage, reduced base amount.
5. The applicant and his spouse divorced in March 2000. The Separation and Property Settlement Agreement dated 9 March 2000 stated in pertinent part that he would continue to provide the SBP for his former spouse. The divorce was effective 28 March 2000.
6. On 10 April 2001, the applicant’s former spouse attempted to request a deemed election of the SBP.
7. On 26 December 2001, the applicant informed an analyst with the Board that he had not remarried.
8. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
9. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
10. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
11. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Attorneys for either the applicant or his former spouse should have been aware of the requirement for either the applicant to make a written request within one year of the divorce to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage or for his former spouse to make a written request within one year of the divorce for a deemed election of the SBP. Neither the applicant nor his former spouse did so but the applicant has requested within a reasonable period of time to correct the error. He has not remarried. It would be equitable to show that he made a written request to change his SBP spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within one year of his divorce.
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested on 1 April 2000 to have his SBP coverage changed to former spouse coverage, reduced base amount.
The Defense Finance and Accounting Service will be instructed to collect any SBP premiums due.
BOARD VOTE:
__inw___ __hof___ __dph___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Irene N. Wheelwright
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001062391 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020115 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069630C070402
The applicant divorced on 15 September 1998. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the applicant changed his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage on 1 October 1998.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072819C070403
The applicant states that the divorce decree ordered him to change his SBP to former spouse coverage. When he retired nine years later, in 2001, he elected spouse and children coverage. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by correcting his DD Form 2656 dated 19 January 2001 to show that he enrolled in the SBP for former spouse and children coverage and that his spouse concurred in his election.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065106C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. His spouse’s consent to his requested change was required before the SBP Board would consider granting his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060936C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records be corrected to show her request for a deemed election of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), was received in a timely manner. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested a deemed election of the FSM’s SBP and forwarded the request and a copy of the divorce decree to DFAS on 27 August 1999. That the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011510C070208
The FSM divorced on 11 May 1995. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. In accordance with Federal Law, a request to change SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage must have been made within one year of the date of divorce by either the FSM or the applicant.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073887C070403
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Although the evidence shows that neither the applicant nor his former spouse made a written request to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage within the one-year time frame, the applicant states that it is his intention...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085250C070212
The applicant states that the court ordered divorce decree required him to provide SBP coverage, with his FS as the beneficiary, with the proviso that the FS make all necessary payments required for continuation of coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083486C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, through counsel, that the FSM and she were married for 34 years. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011142
On 2 August 2007, the FSM’s widow signed an affidavit noting that she and the FSM had been married for less than one year and had no children and that she consented to the applicant’s request to change the FSM’s SBP election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074720C070403
The applicant states that he wants his former spouse to be his SBP beneficiary as agreed in the divorce decree. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested, in writing, that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse and children coverage on 1...