| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Member | ||
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be changed to former spouse coverage.
3. The applicant states that he agreed in their divorce decree that his former spouse would continue to be the SBP beneficiary. He only discovered recently that she was not being covered. He has not remarried.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty on 16 March 1972 and retired on 1 July 1998. At that time he enrolled in the SBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount.
5. The applicant divorced on 15 September 1998. The Separation Agreement/Property Settlement states that the applicant agreed “…to make the wife the sole primary beneficiary of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within sixty (60) days of the date of the filing of the parties’ divorce decree…elect the spouse-only portion…”
6. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
7. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
8. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
9. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant agreed in the Separation Agreement/Property Settlement to maintain his former spouse as the SBP beneficiary. He and his former spouse may have been misled by the wording of the Agreement, i.e., “to elect the spouse-only portion,” because he already had elected spouse only coverage. Had the Agreement correctly read, “to elect the former spouse only portion,” either the applicant or his former spouse might have taken the proper steps within the statutory time frame to effect the change required by the Agreement.
2. In any case, the applicant has indicated that it is his intent to abide by the Agreement and he has not remarried. It would be appropriate to correct his records to show he changed his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the applicant changed his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage on 1 October 1998.
2. That the applicant be advised that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service will be instructed to collect any SBP costs due.
BOARD VOTE:
__INW__ __KAN__ __RTD___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Irene N. Wheelwright ___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002069630 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/27 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008731
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The court order directing SBP coverage for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008265
There is no evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant that shows the FSM ever made the Former Spouse SBP election directed in the divorce decree, or that the applicant requested a deemed election be made within one year of their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses status as an SBP beneficiary upon divorce; however, the means by which the divorced (former) spouse may receive a survivorship annuity are: (1) if the service member...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009877C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005777C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005777 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018666
There is no evidence of record to show that the FSM ever submitted a former spouse SBP election, or that the applicant ever made a deemed election request within one year of their divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the former spouse concerned to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013696
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. The law also permits the former spouse concerned to request a former spouse SBP coverage election be deemed to have been made within 1 year of a date of a court order of divorce. Accordingly, the former spouse's current spouse is the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064691C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, through counsel, that the FSM and the applicant were granted a divorce on 16 November 1995. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104787C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that her mother (the FSM's former spouse) was married to the FSM for most of his military career. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011503
The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show she is the eligible beneficiary to receive a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity as a former spouse. Although the applicant's DOB is shown in the SBP section of the FSM's Retiree Account Statement, there is no evidence of record that shows the FSM changed his SBP category from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage. There is also no evidence that the applicant notified DFAS in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073677C070403
The applicant retired in April 1995. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member is participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the appropriate office received and accepted as a request for a deemed election of the SBP the applicant's...