Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074720C070403
Original file (2002074720C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 19 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002074720


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. JoAnn H. Langston Chairperson
Ms. Melinda M. Darby Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be changed from spouse to former spouse coverage.

3. The applicant states that he wants his former spouse to be his SBP beneficiary as agreed in the divorce decree. Neither he nor she knew they had to send in anything other than the divorce decree. He has been paying SBP premiums since his retirement and he has not remarried.

4. The applicant’s military records show that, after having had prior service, he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 23 August 1971. He retired on 1 September 1991. His Data for Payment of Retired Personnel (either DA Form 4240 or DD Form 2656) is not available; however, records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service show he elected spouse and children coverage, full base amount at that time.

5. The FSM divorced on 31 July 1998. The divorce decree stated in pertinent part that the parties agreed to continue to fund the SBP and that the purpose of the SBP was to ensure the payment of military benefits to the FSM's former spouse in the event of the FSM's death.

6. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

7. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).

8. Public Law 98-525, enacted 19 October 1984, provided that a former spouse could request a deemed election within one year of the court order requiring SBP to be established on the former spouse’s behalf provided the member agreed to provide coverage.

9. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.
CONCLUSIONS:

1. The divorce decree awarded the SBP to the FSM's former spouse. The FSM states that he has not remarried. Although neither he nor his former spouse took the action required by law to change his SBP coverage from spouse and children coverage to former spouse (technically, to former spouse and children coverage even though there may not currently be any eligible child beneficiary), it is now his intent to abide by the provisions of the divorce decree.

2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested, in writing, that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse and children coverage on 1 August 1998.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__JHL__ __MDM__ ___REB__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___JoAnn H. Langston _
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002074720
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/09/19
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION PARTIAL
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083486C070212

    Original file (2003083486C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, through counsel, that the FSM and she were married for 34 years. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015665C070206

    Original file (20050015665C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The DFAS letter provided by the applicant pertained to her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014731C070206

    Original file (20050014731C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She included in the divorce decree that she would like the SBP as part of her divorce settlement for herself and her two children. The applicant submitted a written request, dated 25 May 2005, for a deemed election to DFAS to change the SBP coverage from spouse and children to former spouse and children coverage. Considering the applicant submitted a deemed election for former spouse and children coverage in a timely manner and provided documentation as evidence of her timely deemed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011598

    Original file (20120011598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004710C070206

    Original file (20050004710C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 12 February 2003. When the FSM and the applicant divorced on 12 February 2003, the divorce decree stated in pertinent part that the FSM would enroll in the SBP and name the applicant as the beneficiary.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015805

    Original file (20060015805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests that the records of the FSM be corrected to show the applicant made a timely request for a deemed election of his SBP. Counsel states, in effect, that the applicant and the FSM agreed to a Stipulated Military Qualifying Court Order, dated 23 August 2005, ordering the FSM to make the applicant the irrevocable beneficiary of the survivor benefit portion of the FSM's pension. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004219

    Original file (20080004219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This letter further notified the applicant that if her divorce decree specified that she were to be designated as a former spouse beneficiary for the SBP, she must make a "deemed election" for SBP coverage within one year of the date of the divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004313C070205

    Original file (20060004313C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage. The FSM retired on 1 May 1986 and elected SBP spouse and dependent children coverage. It stated that “[FSM] shall not, during his lifetime, provide, modify, amend, withdraw, or in any other manner alter the election to name [applicant] beneficiary of the Armed Services Survivor Benefit Plan.” However, there is no evidence of record that shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009877C070208

    Original file (20040009877C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005504C070208

    Original file (20040005504C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests either that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse and children coverage to former spouse and children coverage or that his children be determined to be eligible beneficiaries for the SBP. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was...