| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records be corrected to show her request for a deemed election of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), was received in a timely manner.
3. The applicant states that she was married to the FSM for 37 years. She was getting one-half of his retired pay. She believes that if he had not been taking so much medication for pain he would not have left her.
4. The FSM’s military records show that after having had prior U. S. Army Reserve service, he enlisted in the Regular Army in 1962. He and the applicant married on 16 April 1962.
5. The FSM retired on 1 October 1981. At that time, he enrolled in the SBP for spouse only coverage, reduced base amount ($300.00).
6. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 9 July 1999. The divorce decree states in pertinent part “…the Plaintiff also qualifies for and shall hereinafter retain her status/benefits/pension under the Survivor Benefit Plan.” On 27 August 1999, the applicant requested a deemed election of the SBP. It appears that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) received the request for deemed election but not a copy of the divorce decree and therefore could not process the request.
7. The FSM died on 3 August 2000. He apparently never remarried and no one is currently receiving the SBP annuity.
8. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
9. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members.
10. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
11. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
12. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was awarded the SBP in the divorce decree and she requested a deemed election within the required one-year period. However, it appears that
while DFAS received the request for deemed election it did not receive the divorce decree and so her request was not processed. It appears the FSM did not remarry and no one is currently receiving the SBP annuity. It would be appropriate to show that both the request for deemed election and the divorce decree were received by the proper office and processed in a timely manner, making the applicant eligible to receive the SBP annuity.
2. In view of the foregoing, the FSM’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested a deemed election of the FSM’s SBP and forwarded the request and a copy of the divorce decree to DFAS on 27 August 1999.
2. That the proper office received the request for deemed election and the divorce decree and processed them in a timely manner.
3. That the Defense Finance and Accounting Service will be instructed to collect any SBP costs due.
4. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s election to participate in the SBP and the applicant’s request for a deemed election retroactive to the date of his death.
BOARD VOTE:
___fne__ __mhm___ __bje___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Fred N. Eichorn
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001060936 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011018 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077995C070215
By letter dated 15 February 1996, DFAS informed the applicant that her application for a portion of the FSM's retired pay had been received. Public Law 97-252, the USFSPA, dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. When the FSM and the applicant divorced in July 1995, the divorce decree awarded the applicant a portion of the FSM's retired pay and ordered that he change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000163
The letter provided by the applicant from DFAS indicates that she was denied an SBP annuity because no election was made by the applicant or the FSM for former spouse coverage within 1 year of the divorce. Although there is no conclusive evidence that shows a proper former spouse election was made by the FSM, the applicant, or her attorney, the available evidence suggests that it was the FSMs intention to provide an SBP annuity for the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001324
The applicant states that her ex-husband (the FSM) was court-ordered to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse. The divorce decree granted the applicant 42% of the FSM's military retired pay and directed that the FSM participate in the SBP at the FULL amount of his retired pay and that the applicant be deemed the beneficiary as a former spouse. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011371
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014731C070206
She included in the divorce decree that she would like the SBP as part of her divorce settlement for herself and her two children. The applicant submitted a written request, dated 25 May 2005, for a deemed election to DFAS to change the SBP coverage from spouse and children to former spouse and children coverage. Considering the applicant submitted a deemed election for former spouse and children coverage in a timely manner and provided documentation as evidence of her timely deemed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001313
The applicant states that she was married to the FSM for 25 years, 18 of which were during his military service and that upon his retirement, he elected spouse coverage under the SBP. The applicant contends that the records of her former spouse should be corrected to show that her request for a deemed election of former spouse coverage under the SBP was timely received and properly processed by officials at DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004219
This letter further notified the applicant that if her divorce decree specified that she were to be designated as a former spouse beneficiary for the SBP, she must make a "deemed election" for SBP coverage within one year of the date of the divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004313C070205
There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage. The FSM retired on 1 May 1986 and elected SBP spouse and dependent children coverage. It stated that “[FSM] shall not, during his lifetime, provide, modify, amend, withdraw, or in any other manner alter the election to name [applicant] beneficiary of the Armed Services Survivor Benefit Plan.” However, there is no evidence of record that shows the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011260
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 21 September 1989. Although there is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the statutory one-year time limit, it appears that it was the FSM's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010960
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 11 November 1994. Although there is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the statutory one-year time limit, it appears that it was the FSM's...