Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |||
Ms. P. A. Castle | Analyst |
Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |||
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III | Member | |||
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS
: In effect, that his bar to reenlistment be removed, and that his assigned reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of RE-4 be upgraded.
CASE ID | AR2001060919 | |
SUFFIX | ||
RECON | YYYYMMDD | |
DATE BOARDED | 2002/03/05 | |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | ||
DATE OF DISCHARGE | ||
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | ||
DISCHARGE REASON | ||
BOARD DECISION | DENY | |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | ||
ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000 | |
2. 7 | 100.0600/bar | |
3. | ||
4. | ||
5. | ||
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059599C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Accordingly, on 10 May 1990, the applicant was separated from the Army under the provisions of chapter 16-5b, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of a locally imposed bar to reenlistment with an honorable discharge. This includes anyone with a locally imposed bar to reenlistment in effect at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063995C070421
The applicant requests that his locally imposed bar to reenlistment be removed and that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from RE-4 to a more favorable RE code. Paragraph 16-5 applies to personnel denied reenlistment and provides that soldiers who receive DA imposed or locally imposed bars to reenlistment, and who perceive that they will be unable to overcome the bar may apply for immediate discharge. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017031C070206
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. RE–4 applies to persons not qualified for continued service by virtue of being separated from the service with non-waivable disqualifications such as persons with a local bar to reenlistment. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065249C070421
On 8 January 1988, the applicant submitted a request to be discharged prior to his normal expiration of term of service (ETS) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The separation authority’s approval of the applicant’s recommendation for discharge is not present in his file. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074503C070403
Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, Paragraph 16-5a(1) provided the authority for soldiers who perceived that they would not be able to overcome an HQDA-Imposed Bar to Reenlistment to be discharged anytime after receipt of the HQDA bar to reenlistment or notification that the bar to reenlistment appeal had been disapproved. Pertinent Army regulations provide that before discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007341C070206
This form also shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 16-5b of Army Regulation 635- 200 for a locally imposed bar to reenlistment, he was assigned a corresponding separation program designator (SPD) code of KGF, and that his RE code was "4." It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of KGF is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 16-5 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of Headquarters, Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017468C070206
This regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation stated that the SPD code of KGF was the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 16-5b of Army Regulation 635- 200, by the reason of locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged at his own request, based on his perception that he could not overcome his locally imposed bar to reenlistment. In accordance with Army Regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063131C070421
The applicant states that the locally imposed bar to reenlistment was supposed to be automatically lifted after two years. On 21 October 1987, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006836
This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross-Reference Table indicates that a RE Code of 4 or 3 may be applied when the separation code is "KGF." The applicant's separation code of "KGF" is consistent with the basis for his separation; however, the applicable regulation states, in pertinent part, that a RE code of "3" or "4" is appropriate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088835C070403
Prior to the period of service under review, the applicant served honorably in the Regular Army (RA) from 25 June 1991-18 June 1998 when he was separated for immediate reenlistment. An RE code of RE-4 and a separation code of "KGH" apply to those individuals discharged under the provisions of chapter 16-5b, AR 635-200, as a result of a bar to reenlistment. Based upon the stated separation authority and narrative reason for separation, the applicant's separation code and RE code are correct.