Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065249C070421
Original file (2001065249C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 14 March 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065249


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Beverly A. Young Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann Langston Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3.

3. The applicant states that his RE code of RE-4 should be RE-3 due to his honorable discharge. In support of his application, he submits three letters of reference, two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), and a listing of RE codes.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he initially served in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from July 1985 to January 1987. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 February 1987 for a term of three years. He served as a medic in Germany from 11 March 1987 through 4 February 1988.

5. A bar to reenlistment was imposed on the applicant on 10 December 1987 for unfitness for military duty. He received three negative counseling statements for failure to repair and for failing to report.

6. On 10 December 1987, the applicant was counseled and advised of the basis for the bar to reenlistment. He did not submit a statement in his own behalf.

7. On 29 December 1987, the approval authority approved the bar to reenlistment and advised the applicant that he may request immediate discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, if he believes he is unable to overcome the bar to reenlistment.

8. On 8 January 1988, the applicant submitted a request to be discharged prior to his normal expiration of term of service (ETS) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The separation authority’s approval of the applicant’s recommendation for discharge is not present in his file.

9. The applicant was discharged from active duty on 5 February 1988 with an honorable discharge. He completed 11 months and 10 days of creditable service and was issued a RE code of RE-4.

10. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

11. Table 3-6 of Army Regulation 601-210, in effect at the time, states that RE-4 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification and include persons being separated with a Department of the Army Bar to Reenlistment in effect.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, chapter 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.

2. Table 3-6 of Army Regulation 601-210, then in effect, shows that RE-3 is appropriate for soldiers separated with a local bar to reenlistment and RE-4 is required for soldiers separated with a Department of the Army Bar to Reenlistment.

3. It is apparent that there is an error in this case regarding the applicant’s RE code. Therefore, it would be appropriate to change the applicant’s RE code of RE-4 to RE-3.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

a. by deleting the entry “RE-4” from item 27 (Reenlistment Code) of the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned; and

b. by adding the entry “RE-3” to item 27 (Reenlistment Code) of his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

JL______ RWA____ WTM____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Joann Langston________
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065249
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020314
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19880205
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR635-200,chapter 16-5b
DISCHARGE REASON Locally Imposed Bar to Reenlistment
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0300
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084646C070212

    Original file (2003084646C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her reentry (RE) code of 4 be upgraded to a 2, that her separation code be changed, and that the bar to reenlistment be removed from her records. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant requested to be discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 5b after being barred from reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was given RE code 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017031C070206

    Original file (20050017031C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. RE–4 applies to persons not qualified for continued service by virtue of being separated from the service with non-waivable disqualifications such as persons with a local bar to reenlistment. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017468C070206

    Original file (20050017468C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation stated that the SPD code of KGF was the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 16-5b of Army Regulation 635- 200, by the reason of locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged at his own request, based on his perception that he could not overcome his locally imposed bar to reenlistment. In accordance with Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018366

    Original file (20070018366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It explained, in pertinent part, that members separated under this provision who had a local bar to reenlistment with less than 18 years of service would be assigned the RE-3 code. By regulation, members separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, with an SPD code of KGF, based on a locally imposed bar to reenlistment would be assigned the RE-3 code. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was separated by reason of a locally imposed bar to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063995C070421

    Original file (2001063995C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his locally imposed bar to reenlistment be removed and that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from RE-4 to a more favorable RE code. Paragraph 16-5 applies to personnel denied reenlistment and provides that soldiers who receive DA imposed or locally imposed bars to reenlistment, and who perceive that they will be unable to overcome the bar may apply for immediate discharge. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011791

    Original file (20080011791.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his bar to reenlistment be waived, in effect, an upgrade of his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code. On 3 February 1987, the applicant requested to be separated under the provisions of paragraph 16-5, Army Regulation 635-200. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show a RE Code of "RE-3" which is consistent with the basis for his reason for separation and the number of years he had served at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017394

    Original file (20100017394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 13 March 1990, shows the applicant voluntarily requested discharge from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 16, due to a bar to reenlistment. The regulation in effect at the time stated the reason for discharge based on separation code "KGF" was "[Headquarters, Department of the Army]-imposed bar to reenlistment or locally-imposed bar to reenlistment" and the regulatory authority was Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028065

    Original file (20100028065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was honorably separated from the ARNGUS and CAARNG on 29 January 1982 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation. On 7 May 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, with issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table also shows RE code 4 as an appropriate RE code to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025286

    Original file (20100025286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 16 July 1987, the applicant requested that he be separated due to being under a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Army Regulation 601-210, chapter 4, shows separation due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment is waivable for enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010305

    Original file (20060010305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010305 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In his request, the applicant stated that he understood the once he was separated he would not be permitted to reenlist at a later date. In a letter of recommendation, dated 21 October 1988, the applicant’s former...