Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059599C070421
Original file (2001059599C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 8 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059599

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Carolyn G. Wade Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his reentry (RE) code of RE-3, 3C, and 3D in Block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be changed to an RE code that does not require a waiver to re-enter the military.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he has matured over the last 11 years and is now ready to serve his country in the United States Air Force as a second lieutenant. He contends he is not sure why the commander gave him a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and an RE code of RE-3, 3C, 3D without any explanation. He also contends that the commander did not care for him and that he unjustly gave him an inappropriate RE code.

In support of his application, the applicant submitted his DD Form 214 and a statement in his own behalf.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 4 years on 30 August 1988 and the United States Training of Choice Enlistment Option. He enlisted for training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 24 M, Vulcan System Mechanic. Following completion of all military training, the applicant was awarded MOS 24M and was assigned to Fort Bliss, Texas.

On 30 January 1990, the commander recommended that the applicant be barred from reenlistment due to his duty performance, misconduct, and record of non-payment of just debts. On 2 February 1990, the Bar to Reenlistment was approved and the applicant was advised of his rights. The applicant indicated that he would not appeal the Bar to Reenlistment.

On 26 March 1990, the applicant requested to be administratively discharged from the Army due to the imposition of a local bar to reenlistment, which he felt he could not overcome. He noted his expiration of term of service (ETS) date as 29 August 1992 and requested discharge at the earliest possible date. The applicant also acknowledged that he understood that separation prior to ETS was for his own convenience and that once he was discharged he would not be able to reenlist at a later date.

Accordingly, on 10 May 1990, the applicant was separated from the Army under the provisions of chapter 16-5b, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of a locally imposed bar to reenlistment with an honorable discharge. He was credited with 1 year, 8 months, and 11 days of creditable military service. His DD Form 214 reflects the narrative reason for separation as "locally-imposed bar to reenlistment" with a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of KGF and an RE code of RE-3, 3C, and 3D.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 16 covers discharges caused by changes in service obligations. Paragraph 16-5 applies to personnel denied reenlistment and provides that soldiers who receive a DA-imposed or locally-imposed bar to reenlistment, and who perceive that they will be unable to overcome the bar, may apply for immediate discharge. Incident to the request, the member must state that he understands that recoupment of unearned portions of any enlistment or reenlistment bonus is required and that later reenlistment is not permitted.

Army Regulation 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes, contains narrative reasons for discharge, the appropriate SPD codes for those narrative reasons, and a cross-reference to the applicable RE code. Soldiers separated for the purpose of a locally imposed bar to reenlistment are issued an SPD code of KGF and an RE code of RE-3. An RE code of 3, 3C, and 3D indicates the applicant was not eligible for reenlistment without a waiver.

Pertinent Army Regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the United States Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes. RE-3 applies to soldiers that are not fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable. This includes anyone with a locally imposed bar to reenlistment in effect at the time of separation. RE-3C and RE-3D apply to soldiers that did not meet reentry qualification at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s records and determined that his RE code of RE-3 and SPD code of KGF are the appropriate codes for his narrative reason for discharge.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__EFN__ __KYF __ __BJE___ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059599
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011108
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19900510
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, c16b
DISCHARGE REASON Locally imposed Bar
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Director
ISSUES 1. 100.0300
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004422

    Original file (20090004422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change the reason for his discharge and the reenlistment code. On 9 October 1987, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, due to a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing 3C in item 27 (Reenlistment Code)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025367

    Original file (20100025367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the reentry eligibility (RE) code 4 shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). On 13 March 1990, the applicant was barred for reenlistment for being drunk on duty, for misappropriating a government phone, and for not being at his appointed place of duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017042

    Original file (20060017042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reentry (RE) Code "3" be changed to RE "1" on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with a separation date of 1 August 1991, in order to reenlist in the Regular Army. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, Soldiers will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharged under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006836

    Original file (20090006836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross-Reference Table indicates that a RE Code of 4 or 3 may be applied when the separation code is "KGF." The applicant's separation code of "KGF" is consistent with the basis for his separation; however, the applicable regulation states, in pertinent part, that a RE code of "3" or "4" is appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057186C070420

    Original file (2001057186C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009616

    Original file (20060009616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060009616 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry (RE) code of 4 be changed so that he may reenlist in the Army. In his request, the applicant stated that he understood than once separated, he would not be permitted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017394

    Original file (20100017394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 13 March 1990, shows the applicant voluntarily requested discharge from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 16, due to a bar to reenlistment. The regulation in effect at the time stated the reason for discharge based on separation code "KGF" was "[Headquarters, Department of the Army]-imposed bar to reenlistment or locally-imposed bar to reenlistment" and the regulatory authority was Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003831

    Original file (20090003831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 25 (Separation Authority) of the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon separation indicates he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 16-5b of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) by reason of locally imposed bar to reenlistment. It stated, in pertinent part, that the SPD code KGF was the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006808

    Original file (20080006808.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the narrative reason on his Certificate of Release or discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) be changed from "locally imposed bar to reenlistment" to "reduction in force." Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 16 May 1990, the applicant submitted a Personnel Action (DA Form 4187) requesting discharge under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001500

    Original file (20080001500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Chairperson Member Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time confirms that he had completed 2 years, 1 month, and 23 days of active military service and held the pay grade of E-1. The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation stipulated that an SPD code of KGF and RE-4 code would be assigned to...