| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Vic Whitney | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Joe R. Schroeder | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:
19. In implementing the Board’s approved recommendation f. of the 9 January 2001 proceeding, an interpretation was provided by the Army Reserve Personnel Command that this period of service must equal six calendar months. Title 10, United States Code, section 1370(d)(3)(B), requires at least 6 months of satisfactory service in the higher grade to be credited with satisfactory service in that grade. Although the Board’s recommendation provided for 182 days of service in the pay grade of O6, it was 1 day short of six calendar months.
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:
6. At the time of the Board’s 9 January 2001 decision in this case, it was the intent of the Board to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time it voted to allow his retirement in the pay grade of O6 effective 1 December 1998.
7. In view of the additional factor in this case the applicant is entitled to correction of his record to show he was continued on active duty in the pay grade of O6 until 31 December 1998, and retired in that grade effective 1 January 1999.
8. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation appearing in the proceedings, dated 9 January 2001 to show:
| CASE ID | AR2001060683 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010814 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | SUPPLEMENTAL GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.04 |
| 2. | 136.01 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016411
The ABCMR's 17 June 2008 recommendation additionally should have read, "That if she is selected promote her to COL if otherwise eligible ." If the applicant is selected for promotion under the 2000 criteria, whose release date (and, therefore, the earliest date her promotion could be effective) was 4 January 2001, her records would need to be corrected to show she received a further 6-month extension to her MRD in order for her to be eligible to retire as a colonel. The Board determined...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017127
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017127 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 12 April 2005, the applicant submitted a request for an exception to policy to retire as a colonel, pay grade O6. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant requested a voluntary retirement for length of service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062384C070421
The applicant requests that his enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG) be voided so that he can accept his promotion to captain in the Army Reserve as a result of a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) promotion selection. The applicant is entitled to expunction of his enlistment contract, with no force or effect, and further correction of his military records to show he was promoted to captain effective 25 June 1998, with entitlement to back pay and allowances. b. voiding his 30 December...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-149
of the RPM, “satisfactory participation” required attendance at 43 IDT drills and completion of at least 12 days of active duty or ADT, which was known as the annual training (AT) requirement, during an anniversary year. Applicant’s orders … correctly applied this 120-day rule because the duty occurred within the 120-day period after AY98 terminated.” CGPC stated that the orders show that the applicant’s ADT in April 1998 allowed her to meet her AT requirement for AY 1998 even though it...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02738
The applicant’s complete review is at Exhibit F. ___________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/JA states they cannot support the applicant's request that he be given a full 30-year retirement in the grade of colonel given that he only served 22 years of actual active duty time. HQ AFPC/DPPRRP’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit H. ___________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2000-02768A
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 24 October 2002, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered applicant’s request that the Article 15 imposed on 16 February 1994, and the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30 April 1998, be removed from his records and he be sent to a Replacement Training Unit (RTU) to be re-qualified and reinstated in an active status as an Air National Guard (ANG) fighter pilot in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009761C070208
Counsel also provides Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Proceedings, Docket Number AC98-09329/AR1999016304 dated 14 January 1999, in which the ABCMR awarded the applicant in that case the AGCM because he had never been disqualified for the award by his chain of command. In the NCOER for the period ending April 1996, her rater gave her a "No" rating in Part IVa2 with one negative supporting comment. Unit commanders are authorized to award the AGCM to enlisted personnel...
1211(f) “Action under this section [1211] shall be taken on a fair and equitable basis, with regard being given to the probable opportunities for advancement and promotion that the member might reasonably have had if his name had not been placed on the temporary disability retired list.” Simply stated, if he were never on the TDRL, he would have probably scored well enough on the 96E7 test to be promoted in that cycle. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058576C070421
10 USC 1371 contains warrant officer retired grade provisions of the law and states, in pertinent part, that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, a warrant officer retires in the permanent regular or reserve warrant officer grade that he held on the day before the date of his retirement. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant satisfactorily served on active duty in the rank and pay grade of CW3/W-3 and that the highest rank the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03132
His record does not show unsatisfactory service (less than 50 points earned) until Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 January 2000. A correction was made, and his record now shows 91 AD points, 20 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 126 total retirement points, and a year of satisfactory service for RYE 18 January 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...