IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 June 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100016411
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
14. On or about 3 May 2010, the Office of The Judge Advocate General (OTJAG) requested additional information in regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100008793, dated 9 March 2010. OTJAG needed to know what date of rank the Board intended the applicant to have, as she was not assigned to a colonel's position at the time she would have been promoted had she been selected for promotion by the 2000 promotion board.
15. The applicant was born on 19 July 1947, appointed a commissioned officer on 31 December 1968, and promoted to lieutenant colonel on 29 December 1987.
16. As a lieutenant colonel, her mandatory removal date (MRD) would have been 31 December 1996 (28 years of active Federal commissioned service (AFCS)). However, she had been granted at least one MRD extension. Her last extension gave her an MRD of 29 January 2001.
17. Information obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis (USAHRC-STL) revealed that, as a colonel, the applicant's MRD would have been 31 December 1998 (30 years of AFCS).
18. The applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 29 January 2001.
19. On 17 June 2008, the ABCMR corrected the applicant's records by submitting them to a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration for colonel under the 1998, 1999, and 2000 criteria. However, the Board failed to recommend what should happen to the applicant if she were selected for promotion to colonel. Without a clearer directive from the Board, as she no longer had an active status in 2008, by law she could not be promoted.
20. On 9 March 2010, the ABCMR further corrected the applicant's records by adding to the 17 June 2008 recommendation the guidance, "That if she is selected for promotion her records be further corrected by promoting her to COL, assigning the appropriate date of rank, and paid any associated back pay and allowances
" However, the recommendation again failed to address all the possible situations.
21. The applicant had been in a troop program unit. Therefore, if she were selected for promotion by one of the SSBs, she would be required to be in a colonel's position before she could be promoted. The available evidence indicates that she had not been assigned to a colonel's position. The ABCMR's 17 June 2008 recommendation additionally should have read, "That if she is selected
promote her to COL if otherwise eligible
."
22. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1370(d)(3)(A), states that, in order to be credited with satisfactory service (for retirement) in an officer grade above major, a Reserve officer must have served satisfactorily in that grade in an active status for not less than 3 years.
23. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1370(d)(3)(B)(i), states a Reserve officer who has completed at least six months of satisfactory service in grade may be credited with satisfactory service in the grade in which serving at the time of transfer out of an active status, notwithstanding failure of the officer to complete 3 years of service in that grade, if that officer is transferred from an active status solely due to the requirements of a nondiscretionary provision of law requiring that transfer due to the officer's age or years of service.
24. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14507(b), states a Reserve officer in the grade of COL and who is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade shall be removed from the Reserve Active Status List on the first day of the month after the month in which the officer completes 30 years of commissioned service.
25. Information obtained from USAHRC-STL revealed that the 2000 COL Reserve Components Selection Board results were released on 4 January 2001.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
7. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20100008793, dated 9 March 2010, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicant's record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time.
8. The ABCMR made errors (by omission) in both its 17 June 2008 and 9 March 2010 case recommendations.
9. At this point in time, whether the applicant is selected for promotion by an SSB under either the 1998, 1999, or 2000 criteria, it is the intent of the Board to show that she was eligible for promotion to colonel (by showing she had been assigned to a colonel's position).
10. As a colonel, the applicant's MRD would have been 31 December 1998. She was actually transferred to the Retired Reserve on 29 January 2001.
11. The release date of the 2000 promotion board was 4 January 2001.
12. If the applicant is selected for promotion under either the 1998 or the 1999 criteria, she could have been transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rank of colonel on 29 January 2001 (as she would have been required to be transferred from an active status solely due to the requirements of a nondiscretionary provision of law due to years of service and as she would have completed at least six months of satisfactory service as a colonel by that date).
13. If the applicant is selected for promotion under the 2000 criteria, whose release date (and, therefore, the earliest date her promotion could be effective) was 4 January 2001, her records would need to be corrected to show she received a further 6-month extension to her MRD in order for her to be eligible to retire as a colonel. It appears that such an additional correction would be equitable, given the circumstances of this case.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ ___X____ ___X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
4. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number 20100008793, dated 9 March 2010, to amend the Board recommendation in that case to read:
3. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080001962, dated 17 June 2008, to add in paragraph 1 of the BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
a. that if she is selected for promotion her records be further corrected by showing she met all the eligibility criteria for promotion (i.e., being assigned to a colonel's position) effective the date of the release of the applicable promotion selection board, promoting her to colonel with the appropriate date of rank, and paying to her any associated back pay and allowances;
b. that if she is selected for promotion by either the 1998 or the 1999 board, that her records be further corrected by showing she was transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rank of colonel under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1370(d)(3)(B)(i);
c. that if she is selected for promotion by the 2000 board, that her records be further corrected by showing she was promoted to colonel effective 4 January 2001 and granted another MRD extension sufficient to allow her to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rank of colonel under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1370(d)(3)(B)(i);
d. that if she is not selected for promotion, she be notified accordingly.
___ _ ___XXX_ ___ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100016411
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Supplemental Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100016411
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018814
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018814 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In an advisory opinion, Headquarters, USAR Command, recommended the applicant's request be denied because the applicant did not experience any break in service due to the Board's actions. Additionally, section 14507(a) requires that he be separated upon completion of 28 years of commissioned service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007694
The applicant requests, in effect, that his Mandatory Removal Date (MRD) be adjusted to 1 July 2005, the maximum date allowed for Colonel (COL) instead of 1 July 2003, the MRD for Lieutenant Colonel (LTC). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding his transfer to the Retired Reserve effective 1 July 2003; b. crediting him with 46 inactive duty points, 15 membership points and 26 active duty points for a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012136
An advisory official stated this responds to the applicant's request to retire in the rank of COL under the reduced age provisions contained in section 12731(f)(2), Title 10, USC. The applicant, an IRR officer, contends, with support from the HRC IG, that the reduced age provisions of Section 12731(f)(2) require his non-regular retirement at an age earlier than age 60, since he has active duty service qualifying for the age reduction. e. Finally, subsection 1370(d)(3)(B) states a "person...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012136
An advisory official stated this responds to the applicant's request to retire in the rank of COL under the reduced age provisions contained in section 12731(f)(2), Title 10, USC. The applicant, an IRR officer, contends, with support from the HRC IG, that the reduced age provisions of Section 12731(f)(2) require his non-regular retirement at an age earlier than age 60, since he has active duty service qualifying for the age reduction. e. Finally, subsection 1370(d)(3)(B) states a "person...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017983C070206
The applicant also states that prior to his retirement, in December 2002, the unit had a drill with all members of the unit present, including some that he had not seen before. The USARC determined that the applicant filled a colonel position at the State Department unit while serving as a lieutenant colonel. Crediting the applicant with a qualifying year, as discussed above, and payment of the difference in pay between a lieutenant colonel and colonel for creditable periods of service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026100
The applicant requests, in effect, * education waivers with consecutive promotion corrections due to the findings of Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20070001144, dated 2 August 2007 * a 4-year extension of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to allow him to qualify for a 20-year nonregular retirement 2. On 2 August 2007, the ABCMR granted his request for correction of his records as follows: * determined his 19 April 1996 DA Form 5074-1-R was incorrect *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017269
The applicant requests removal of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Colonel (COL) Army Promotion List (APL) non-select letter from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), correction of the date of rank (DOR) and effective date of her promotion to the rank/grade of COL/O-6, correction of her mandatory retirement date (MRD) to 1 July 2017, and attendance at the Army War College in July 2014. g. The Army regulations provide that a special selection board (SSB) will not be convened to consider...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019109
She was considered for promotion to LTC by the FY12 LTC JAGC PSB and was not selected for promotion. With her request to HRC, she submitted 16 statements of support, wherein, in part, her instructor, senior rater, several COLs, LTCs, other officers, noncommissioned officers (NCO), and a general officer, all stated, they supported her request for an SSB, she stood out from her peers, she was an officer and attorney of the highest caliber, and she should be promoted to LTC. Notwithstanding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017181
References: * Title 10, USC, section 10145: Ready Reserve Placement In * Title 10, USC, section 12213: Officers Army Reserve: Transfer from ARNGUS * Title 10, USC, section 12215: Commissioned Officers Reserve Grade of Adjutant Generals and AAG's * Title 10, USC, section 14003: Reserve Active Status List (RASL) Position of Officers on the List * Title 10, USC, section 14507: Removal from the RASL for Years of Service, Reserve Lieutenant Colonels and COL's of the Army, Air Force, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003972
The applicant requests promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by the September 2005 Special Selection Board (SSB) with back pay and allowances and placement on the Retired List in the grade of LTC. However, despite being in the Retired Reserve, in 1993 he was considered for promotion to MAJ, but he was not selected. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Voiding Orders 08-036-00050, issued by Headquarters,...