| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that his personnel records show his award of the Purple Heart. However, it was omitted from his report of separation (DD Form 214).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in Cleveland, Ohio on 4 January 1968. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 16 June 1968, for duty as a light weapons infantryman with B Company, 1st Battalion, 508th Infantry Regiment.
5. While in Vietnam he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Commendation Medal and the Bronze Star Medal.
6. He departed Vietnam on 30 June 1969 and was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty on 16 December 1969. He had served 1 year, 11 months and 12 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. There is no indication in the available records to show that he was ever wounded or that he was awarded the Purple Heart.
7. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 provides the lists of unit citations and campaign participation. It shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) for the period of 1 May 1968 to 8 January 1969 by General Order 43 in 1970, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (RVNGCw/Palm) for the period of 6 October 1968 to 11 November 1969 by General Order 43 in 1970 and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) for the period of 12 March to 4 October 1968 by General Order 48 in 1971.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. While it is possible that the applicant was wounded in Vietnam and was awarded the Purple Heart, there is no evidence in the available records to show that such was the case. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no basis to award him the PH at this time or to correct his records to show such an award.
2. However, the available evidence does show that subsequent to the applicant’s separation from the service, his unit was awarded the VUA, the RVNGCw/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM-FC for the period in which he served with that unit. Accordingly, he is entitled to receive those awards and to have his records corrected as well.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the VUA, the RVNGCw/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM-FC, with appropriate corrections made to his records.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__rks ___ ___dh___ ___rvo __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Raymond C. O’Connor, Jr__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001059238 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/10/16 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 2. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 3. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 4. 79 | 107.0033/VUA |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057243C070420
There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded on 26 March 1969 while serving as an infantryman in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel. Although these awards were authorized subsequent to the applicant’s separation from active duty, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be corrected to include these awards at this time. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083341C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for wounds/injuries received in Vietnam on 9 January 1968. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058534C070421
The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries received in Vietnam. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 8 May 1967 for duty as an infantryman. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided the criteria for award or disqualification of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059419C070421
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded, that he was awarded the Purple Heart and that the award was omitted from his records. Although there is no evidence to show that he was awarded the GCMDL, the Board finds that given the lack of disqualifying evidence to show that he would not have been entitled to the award, that it is reasonable to believe that he was awarded the GCMDL as he contends and that like the Purple Heart, it was an administrative oversight on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080587C070215
The applicant states that he believes that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for a wound he received in Vietnam when a piece of shrapnel hit him in the inner left thigh. The Board finds that there is sufficient evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was in fact wounded in Vietnam and should have been awarded the Purple Heart for his wound. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068800C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He further states that when he departed Vietnam he was told that he was being recommended for awards of the BSM and CIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068947C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Although his records contain no evidence that he was awarded the Purple Heart for his wound, the certificate provided by the applicant shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart by the hospital commander on 23 January 1969, for wounds received in action on 13 December 1968. After carefully examining the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091574C070212
The applicant states that he received three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam; however, none of them are entered on his DD Form 214. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation, and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062100C070421
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides Department of the Army policy for the administration of individual military decorations. The applicant clearly was awarded three awards of the BSM and his records should be corrected accordingly. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the BSM with “V” Device and 2 OLCs and by awarding him the RVNGC w/palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM – FC.