| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam on 26 March 1969; however, the award was never entered on his separation document (DD Form 214). He goes on to state that he never noticed the omission of the Purple Heart until just recently when he was informed by officials at the Veterans Administration that he would be entitled to more benefits if the award of the Purple Heart was documented. He also states that he has the medal he was issued but is unable to locate copies of the orders. In support of his application he submits a copy of a Western Union Telegram from the Adjutant General of the Army to his parents informing them that he had been slightly wounded in action against the enemy on 26 March 1969.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 28 August 1968. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 21 January 1969 for duty as a light weapons infantryman with the 1st Cavalry Division.
5. His records show that he received fragmentation wounds to the neck on 26 March 1969. However, there is no indication that a Purple Heart was issued.
6. He completed his tour of duty in Vietnam and was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington, where he remained until he was honorably released from active (REFRAD) duty on 7 June 1970. He had served 1 year, 9 months and 7 days of total active service and was REFRAD early to attend school. His DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (one with a “V” device for valor), the National Defense Service Medal, the Air Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
8. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the units the applicant was assigned to was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM - FC) and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) for the period in which he served.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded on 26 March 1969 while serving as an infantryman in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel.
2. Therefore, given the applicant’s assertion that he was in fact awarded the Purple Heart at the time, it is reasonable to presume that the failure to enter the award in his records was the result of an administrative oversight. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct this error at this time.
3. The Board also determined that the applicant is entitled to awards of the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM – FC and the VUA for his service in Vietnam with units of the 1st Cavalry Division. Although these awards were authorized subsequent to the applicant’s separation from active duty, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be corrected to include these awards at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and by awarding him the RVNGCw/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM – FC and the VUA.
BOARD VOTE:
_hbo____ __cla____ ___ao___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Celia L. Adolphi ____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001057243 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/10/30 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000/CORR 214 |
| 2. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 3. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 4. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 5. 79 | 107.0033/VUA |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083341C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for wounds/injuries received in Vietnam on 9 January 1968. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080587C070215
The applicant states that he believes that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for a wound he received in Vietnam when a piece of shrapnel hit him in the inner left thigh. The Board finds that there is sufficient evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was in fact wounded in Vietnam and should have been awarded the Purple Heart for his wound. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019355
The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Cambodia in June 1970 and received the Purple Heart; however, it was not reflected on his records at the time of his release from active duty. However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding of the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal with one oak leaf cluster,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059238C070421
The applicant states that his personnel records show his award of the Purple Heart. While it is possible that the applicant was wounded in Vietnam and was awarded the Purple Heart, there is no evidence in the available records to show that such was the case. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058534C070421
The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries received in Vietnam. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 8 May 1967 for duty as an infantryman. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided the criteria for award or disqualification of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068800C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He further states that when he departed Vietnam he was told that he was being recommended for awards of the BSM and CIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078323C070215
In support of his application he submits statements from the company executive officer (a Retired colonel) and two former members of his unit who were present when he was wounded and a copy of the orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Accordingly, the Board must presume that given the circumstances surrounding the attack, the large number of soldiers killed and wounded and the confusion that followed thereafter, that because the applicant was returned to duty after medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058293C070421
The evidence of record fails to clearly show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action. Therefore, he is entitled to be awarded those medals and to have his records corrected accordingly. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.