| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
2. The applicant requests that certain blocks of her enlistment document (DD Form 4/1 and 4/2) be corrected, and that a correct DD Form 4/1 and 4/2 be substituted therewith.
3. The applicant states that she reenlisted in the Army Reserve on 21 February 2001 and her commander duly signed and dated her DD Form 4/2 (block 19f). The unit’s service representative entered the date that she prepared the enlistment document, 20 February 2001 (block 14f) . The applicant states that she neglected to enter the dates that she reenlisted, noticed the oversight prior to mailing the document, and entered the date of 1 March 2001, the date that she mailed the document, in blocks 5, 13c, and 18b instead of her reenlistment date of 21 February 2001. The applicant submits statements from her commanding officer and unit clerk attesting to the fact that she reenlisted on 21 February 2001.
4. The applicant also submits a “CORRECTED COPY” of the DD Form 4/1 and 4/2 with all blocks dated to show she reenlisted on 21 February 2001.
5. There are no military records available other than those mentioned above.
6. Army Regulation 140-111 provides instructions for preparation of the DD Form 4 series and states in paragraph 5-10 that a correction to the term of service or the effective date of reenlistment agreement is prohibited. The soldier must petition the ABCMR for correction consideration. That paragraph goes on to say that the applicant’s commander may correct administrative or typographical errors that will not affect the term of service or the effective date of the enlistment document by preparing a new DD Form 4 series, correcting all previous errors and placing the words “CORRECTED COPY” at the top and bottom of each page of the DD Form 4 series.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant reenlisted in the Army Reserve for three years on 21 February 2001. Her enlistment documents should reflect that information.
2. The applicant’s request to substitute a “CORRECTED COPY” of the DD Form 4 series in lieu of the original DD Form 4 series is not accepted. A corrected copy is authorized only to correct administrative or typographical errors that do not affect the term of enlistment or the effective date of the enlistment document.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that she reenlisted in the Army Reserve for three years on 21 February 2001, and consequently blocks 5, 13b. 14f, and 18b should reflect that date.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__MDM _ __LE ___ __GJW __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___ Mark D. Manning____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001058753 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010719 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 112.00 |
| 2. | 225 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018070C070206
Qawly Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that her reenlistment contract be corrected by changing her date of enlistment/reenlistment from 24 October 2006 to 24 October 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing her reenlistment date, signature date for the service representative, commander...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009853
The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 25 May 1985, that shows she was honorably REFRAD after completing 3 years of total active service. In support of her application, the applicant provides a DA Form 873 that shows, in pertinent part, she was granted a Secret security clearance on 23 May 1979; a DA Form 134 that shows she successfully completed 4 years of instruction in the Senior ROTC on 15 May 1981; 2 pages of a DA Form 2-1...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02099
In a rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, applicant now requests that she be reinstated to active duty in the Air Force, promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) and allowed to cross train into the Paralegal career field she was approved for prior to her discharge. The applicant’s complete statement is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K,”...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071221C070402
The applicant states he enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 13 February 2001, however the computer print out as well as other enlistment documents show he enlisted on 13 February 2000. In a memorandum to this Board, dated 14 March 2002, the applicant’s Command Retention Officer requested that the applicant’s DD Form 4 series and all-inclusive attachments and agreements be corrected by showing his enlistment date as 13 February 2001. Army Regulation 140-111, chapter 5, paragraph 5-10,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002593C070206
The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 shows that he had only 2 years, 3 months and 20 days of active service. The records do contain an unsigned Certification of Military Service, dated 21 February 1980, for the period of service from 30 November 1970 to 30 August 1972 that shows service was terminated by honorable discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007573
The applicant requests the following corrections on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 September 2003: * Item 1 (Name-Last, First, Middle) correct the spelling of her first name * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 4b (Pay Grade) be corrected to show she was promoted to sergeant (SGT), E-5 * Item 14 (Military Education) be corrected to show she completed 13 weeks of training in the automated logistics specialist course *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006133
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct dates of service in Iraq. On 24 June 2005, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and subsequently served in Iraq from 27 September 2005 to 1 September 2006. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 11 months and 5 days of foreign service in Kuwait/Iraq from 27 September 2005 to 1 September 2006.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016768
Accordingly, her records should be corrected at this time to reflect in block 7a of her DD Form 214 that she entered active duty in Brooklyn, New York. Accordingly, her DD Form 214 reflected all of her service from 1978 to 1995 and reflected her prior active service as well. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in block 7a of her DD Form 214 dated 31 May 1995 that she entered active duty in Brooklyn,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017748
He also states, in effect, that a memorandum completed in accordance with Army Regulation 25-50 and a copy of his current Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) physical examination was not submitted to get his grade determination but were required per Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), paragraph 4-22, dated 16 May 2005. Paragraph 3-17 of Army Regulation 601-210 pertains to enlistment pay grade for applicants with prior military service who are...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089577C070403
On 29 May 2001, the Survey officer notified the applicant of the ROS recommendation that she assessed financial liability in the amount of $3,358.10 for the damage to the GOV. Thus, the obstruction should be the proximate cause of the accident, not her negligence as was indicated in the ROS. Paragraph 13-28 of the same regulation states that a survey officer's responsibility is to determine the cause and value of the loss, damage, or destruction of Government property listed on the ROS and...