IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 10 JUNE 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002297
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the recoupment of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that after he was discharged from the Army he was asked to repay a percentage of his "sign-on bonus" [SRB]. He states that he served honorably in Iraq and was discharged in February 2006 for medical disability. On September 2006, he received notification that he must unjustly repay the SRB. He is trying to go to school and has to use his disability payment to repay the SRB.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his separation document (DD Form
214), letter from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, dated 2 January 2008, DFAS Form 705 (Certificate for Income Tax Adjustment), and a notification letter from Allied Interstate, Inc., dated 15 January 2008 which shows a total debt balance of $1,607.94.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 August 2000. He completed the necessary training and was awarded the military occupation specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).
2. The applicant reenlisted for 6 years on 3 October 2002 and he elected 50 percent payment of his SRB.
3. His DD Form 214 shows that he served in Kuwait/Iraq in support of Operation Enduring/Iraqi Freedom during the period 15 November 2003 to 3 November 2004.
4. On 23 November 2005, the applicant underwent a mental status evaluation. The evaluation described the applicants behavior as normal; level of alertness as fully alert; level of orientation as fully oriented; mood and affect as Anxious and "Depressed;" thinking process as clear; thought content as "normal;" and his memory as good. The applicant was diagnosed on Axis I with an adjustment disorder, mixed emotional features, and on Axis II with a personality disorder not otherwise specified. Separation from the service was recommended.
5. On 1 December 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation), paragraph 5-13 by reason of a personality disorder. The applicant was advised of his rights. The unit commanders reason for his proposed separation action was the applicants diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features, which affects the performance of his military duties.
6. On 2 December 2005, the applicant acknowledged the notification of separation action, waived consultation with legal counsel, and did not submit statements in his own behalf.
7. On 9 February 2006, the applicant was discharged with an honorable discharge for the convenience of the government due to personality disorder under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13. He completed 5 years, 5 months, and 29 days of Net Active Service This Period.
8. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1. The Chief, Incentive and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division noted that the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation (Volume 7A, chapter 9, section 090503 M (11)), states that personality disorder separations are among those listed conditions that are subject to recoupment. However, had that case been submitted through command channels to request a waiver of recoupment by Headquarters Department of the Army, such waiver would certainly have been considered by that office. Approval of the applicant's request was recommended. A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant and he concurred.
9. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-200 that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, chronic airsickness, chronic seasickness, enuresis, severe nightmares, and other disorders manifesting disturbances of perception, thinking, emotional control or behavior sufficiently severe that the Soldiers ability to perform military duties is significantly impaired.
10. In a memorandum from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense dated
18 September 2007, it was directed that repayment will not be sought if the member's inability to fulfill the eligibly requirements (completion of reenlistment) is due to circumstances determined reasonably beyond the member's control. Such circumstances may include, but are not limited to: injury, illness, or other impairment which is not the result of the member's misconduct.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant requests that the recoupment of his SRB be waived, because he received an honorable discharge due to medical disability.
2. The applicant's separation was not voluntary and was not based on misconduct. Accordingly, in keeping with the directive outlined in the memorandum from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense dated
18 September 2007, repayment of the applicant's SRB should not be sought since the applicant's inability to fulfill the eligibly requirements (his reenlistment) was due to circumstances beyond his control.
3. Based on the Army G-1 advisory opinion and the memorandum from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, it would be in the interest of justice to correct the record to show that the applicant requested and was granted a waiver of recoupment for the amount of $1,607.94. Also, based on this correction the applicant should be refunded any funds already recouped.
BOARD VOTE:
__X_____ __X_____ __X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
a. showing the applicant requested and was granted a waiver of recoupment for the unearned portion of his bonus incentive prior to his discharge from the Army; and
b. showing that any recoupment action taken is erroneous and any funds already collected will be reimbursed.
_ __X_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080002297
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080002297
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03414
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03414 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 JUNE 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge be changed to reflect a medical reason that would not require recoupment of his enlistment bonus. The BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008382
The applicant provides: a. On 6 May 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder. Based on the Army G-1 opinion and the in the interest of justice, it would now be appropriate to correct the record to show that applicant requested and was granted a waiver of recoupment of his unearned portion of his bonus incentive prior to his discharge from the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016610
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show: * he was not absent without leave (AWOL) * he was not overpaid during the period August 2008 through March 2009 * reduction of his enlistment bonus 2. On 22 December 2005, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286 (Statement for Enlistment U.S. Army Enlistment Program U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program) which authorized a $6,000.00 enlistment bonus for his enlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02291
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 17 August 2001, the applicant was notified of his commander's intent to initiate discharge action against him for conditions that interfere with military service, more specifically, an Adjustment Disorder with mixed emotional features, Mixed Receptive - Expressive Language disorder, Reading Disorder, and for misconduct, more specifically, Minor Disciplinary Infractions. After consulting with counsel, applicant requested...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600226
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority.” The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area. The patient denied symptoms of psychosis, including auditory and visual hallucinations, paranoia, ideas of reference, or an active delusional system. The Applicant provided one...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018254
On 4 August 2008, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, due to his adjustment disorder with depressive mood and personality disorder with cluster B traits. The OTSG states the applicant reported he was diagnosed with PTSD prior to his discharge for personality disorder. The records supported the personality disorder diagnosis with a long-standing...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00647 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code be changed. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was administratively separated due to an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, and traits of a personality disorder. On...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600935
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)Five pages from the Applicant’s Service Record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20010328 - 20010726 COG Active: None Period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015880
The advisory opinion further indicates that regarding cases when Soldiers are separated for an unfulfilled contract or in doubtful cases, commanders have the option to request a waiver of recoupment provisions. Memoranda provided by the applicant's chain of command and career counselor both concur that the Department of the Army breached the terms of the applicant's reenlistment contract; therefore, the applicant is not obligated to repay the reenlistment bonus. Considering there is no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019022
She was originally considered by an MEB on 26 June 2010 that listed six conditions: Metatarsalgia, Anxiety Disorder, Psoriasis, Chronic chest pain, Irritable bowel syndrome, and Myofascial cervical pain. The revised MEB recommended the applicant's referral to a physical evaluation board (PEB). c. After deliberation, the formal PEB concluded that the applicant's psychiatric conditions documented on the revised MEB (Adjustment Disorder and Anxiety Disorder) may be considered administratively...