Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055347C070420
Original file (2001055347C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 31 July 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001055347

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be paid a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) 1.5A (military occupational specialty (MOS) 92Y) effective date 31 January 1999.

APPLICANT STATES: That at the time of his reenlistment he was on airborne status at Fort Bragg, NC. He reenlisted for Europe but was told there were no airborne assignments available in Europe. Once he arrived at the replacement detachment in Germany, however, he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 508th Infantry in Vicenza, Italy where he performs airborne duties.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 August 1998 for 3 years. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded MOS 92Y (Unit Supply Specialist). He was awarded the Parachutist Badge on 12 February 1999.

On 7 August 2000, the applicant reenlisted for 3 years. He was not entitled to a bonus.

In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Retention Management Division, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM). PERSCOM noted that Army Regulation 601-280, paragraph 5-5e(3) requires a soldier reenlisting for an A zone bonus to have a total of at least 6 years of active service at the new expiration term of service (ETS) date. The applicant’s reenlistment of 7 August 2000 gives him 5 years and 1 day of active federal service at his new ETS. He could request to voluntarily change his term of reenlistment to 4 years, entitling him to SRB 1.5A, MOS 92Y “w/p” or he could request separation for an unfulfilled reenlistment commitment. (PERSCOM has stated that a request for a change in his term of reenlistment would involve his unit and PERSCOM, not a further application to the Board.)

A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment. He did not respond within the given time frame.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1. In accordance to the advisory opinion, because of the applicant’s new ETS he was not entitled to SRB 1.5A for MOS 92Y “w/p” regardless of his airborne status at the time of his 7 August 2000 reenlistment for 3 years. (The Board cannot determine how the applicant arrived at his request for “effective date 31 January 1999.”) The Board concludes that the two options offered by the advisory opinion are equitable and further relief would not be appropriate.
2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wtm___ __aao___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001055347
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010731
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.05
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076592C070215

    Original file (2002076592C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Member of Congress was further informed that the applicant could get out of the Army "based on an unfulfilled enlistment contract or he can choose to accept his enlistment without the BSSRB." In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) Retention Management Division, which opined that the applicant had been improperly informed that he would receive a BSSRB because he was not eligible and did not meet the criteria...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058736C070421

    Original file (2001058736C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records were not provided to the Board. However, since there is no evidence that the applicant was informed that he had the option of requesting discharge, and the time to do so has expired, the Board will recommend that he now be provided that option. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by providing the individual concerned 60 days from the date of this document to request discharge as a result of his defective...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012772

    Original file (20050012772.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    To be eligible for the SRB, a Soldier must have been serving within his or her first 16 years of active service, must have reenlisted in the AGR program for at least 3 years, and must have been serving on AGR duty in the rank of Sergeant, E-5 through SFC. That office noted the applicant failed to reenlist before reaching her 16 years of active service on 11 April 2005 because she was erroneously told she could only reenlist within a 90-day window of her ETS to qualify for the SRB. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055177C070420

    Original file (2001055177C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that in 1987, when he received a 1.5A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB), he was authorized to receive a 3A SRB due to reenlistment in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13N. He also submits DD Forms 4/1-4/2, dated 22 June 1987; an Enlisted Record Brief, dated 19 March 2001; a Memorandum for Record, dated 19 March 2001; and a copy of a DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record). In view of the foregoing findings and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607659C070209

    Original file (9607659C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that upon completion of his Bonus Extension and Retraining (BEAR) Program training in MOS 91C, he was offered the option to reenlist in the pay grade of E-4 the day before graduation. On 6 December 1991 the applicant reenlisted for the first time for a period of 4 years with no entitlement to an SRB. The PERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s reenlistment contract of 6 December 1991 be corrected to reflect that he reenlisted on 1 July 1989 for a period of 5 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607250C070209

    Original file (9607250C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 8 February 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) of 1A. The applicant states that at the time of his reenlistment on 8 February 1995, he was informed that he was not entitled to receive an SRB because he was not assigned to an airborne “P” position. The PERSCOM indicated that the applicant reenlisted for assignment to Fort Bragg and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072881C070403

    Original file (2002072881C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: It states, in pertinent part, that the Enlistment Bonus is an enlistment incentive offered to those enlisting in the Regular Army for duty in a specific MOS. Army Regulation 601-280 sets forth the basic authority for the Army Enlistment Program for all military personnel of the Active Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061372C070421

    Original file (2001061372C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be paid a 1.5A bonus under the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) program in conjunction with his reenlistment on 25 July 2001. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005996C070206

    Original file (20050005996C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reenlistment date be changed to October 1999 so that he may be eligible to receive a reenlistment bonus. The advisory opinion further stated that MOS 79S is not the normal line of progression for MOS 11B and he was not eligible for an 11B3V B Zone bonus in October 1999 or in September 2000. Evidence of record shows that the applicant served in MOS 79S prior to October 1999.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605175C070209

    Original file (9605175C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her reenlistment contract dated 13 May 1994 be corrected to reflect that she was authorized a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-3A. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted on 29 August 1990 for training as a counterintelligence agent (97B). At the time the applicant reenlisted to meet the service remaining requirements for an overseas assignment, it was not known that she would be occupying an airborne position (SQI “P”).