MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 8 April 1999
DOCKET NUMBER: AC97-09899
AR1999018729
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded more service time to qualify for VA assistance or benefits.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was to finish his enlistment on limited service, but due to an oversight on the evaluation board he was not called. When he found out about it, it was too late; his doctor went on leave and when he returned he said, it is in the pipeline, I cant do anything about it.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel offered no evidence or argument beyond that submitted with the application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Information herein was obtained from reconstructed personnel records.
The applicant enlisted on 31 December 1948 and, after training, was assigned to Japan. While serving in Japan, he was admitted to the 361st Station Hospital with seizures. Generalized seizures were witnessed by the nurse on 30 August, 9 September and 13 September 1949. He was transferred to Walter Reed General Hospital, Washington, DC with the diagnosis of epilepsy, grand mal; neuropathy of facial nerve, left, cause undetermined; cyst, sebaceous, right and left ears.
On 13 December 1949 a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened and considered four diagnoses. A single diagnosis of epilepsy, grand mal, manifested by right-sided and generalized convulsive seizures occurring up to seven times a day, with abnormal electroencephalogram, which existed prior to service (EPTS), was made as not meeting retention standards. The MEB recommended that the applicants case be considered by a physical evaluation board (PEB).
On 22 December 1949 a PEB found the applicant physically unfit based on the MEB diagnosis. It was concluded that there was sufficient evidence to substantiate that this condition existed prior to service and was not aggravated by service. The applicant was separated with an honorable discharge on
23 January 1950. He had 1 year and 23 days of creditable service.
Army Regulation 635-40, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation, appendix B-10, provides that hereditary, congenital, and other EPTS conditions frequently become unfitting through natural progression and should not be assigned a disability rating unless service aggravated complications are
clearly documented or unless a soldier has been permitted to continue on active duty after such a condition, known to be progressive, was diagnosed or should have been diagnosed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. That the applicant was separated by reason of physical disability which existed prior to service and is not entitled to disability benefits from the service.
2. There is no record of the applicant having served more than 1 year and
23 days for which he was credited at the time of separation.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
INDEX
CASE ID
AC97-09899/AR1999018729
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
19990408
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
110.00
2.
113.00
3.
145.03
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709899
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00222
The Board noted the presence of the shoulder condition as a currently rated condition by the VA, but notes that the scope of its recommendations does not extend to conditions that were incurred after separation or which were not diagnosed or in evidence at the time of medical separation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03429
The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the shoulder condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The IPEB also determined there was compelling evidence to support a finding that the seizure condition existed prior to service (EPTS) and was not permanently aggravated beyond natural progression by military service. The Board noted the CI experienced another seizure in April 2009, 3 months after separation and the ER physician indicated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014068
The PDBR's main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEBs determination that the conditions of tinnitus, GERD, hyperlipidemia, pes planus with plantar fasciitis, allergic rhinitis, colonic diverticulitis, atopic dermatitis, and obesity were not unfitting. The PEB found her unfitting conditions prevented her from performing the duties required of her grade and military specialty and determined she was physically unfit due to epilepsy (rated at 10 percent) and chronic low back pain (also...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00059
Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Boards defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. Post-Separation) Effective - 20100401 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Epilepsy, Partial Motor w/ Secondary Generalization 8999-8910 10% Seizure Disorder 8910 10%* 20110815 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x 2 20110815 Combined: 10% Combined: 20% Derived from...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00267
The Board noted no mental health (MH) conditions were referred to the MEB or PEB for adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a determination of unfit for a mental health condition; and, therefore, no additional disability ratings can be recommended. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130016483 (PD201300267)I have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010586
He was rated under the VASRD and was granted a 10 percent disability rating for code 8910. c. The PEB informed him that ratings of less than 30 percent for Soldiers with less than 20 years of active service required separation with severance pay in lieu of retirement and the amount of severance pay would be based on his active duty service time and not his disability rating. Based upon the evidence, the PEB determined that the applicant did not meet the criteria for disability retirement:...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000803
He adds that there was also a considerable amount of live fire training in which he was fearful of firing his weapon and having a grand mal epileptic seizure with his finger on the trigger. On 15 February 1967, the applicant was recommended for separation under Army Regulation 635-40A (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Separation or Retirement for Physical Disability) by his chain of command because of epileptic seizures. Army Regulation 635-40A, paragraph 33, in effect at the time,...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00712
The medical record documents three major seizures in the first year of diagnosis, in November 2002, March 2003, and July 2003. VA treatment report on 20 November 2008, also stated last the major seizure was March 2008. The FPEB noted that the CI had another seizure in March 2008.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00140
The MEB forwarded epilepsy with breakthrough seizures on therapeutic levels of medications as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. In the matter of the seizure disorder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 8910 IAW VASRD §4.124. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.