Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710074
Original file (9710074.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his date of rank for promotion to pay grade E-6 be changed from 1 April to 1 March 1997.

APPLICANT STATES : That had the Personnel Services Battalion (PSB) properly credited his DD 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet), with 10 points for educational improvement, he would have met the promotion cut off score for 1 March 1997.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 May 1988 and has remained on active duty thru continuous reenlist- ments.

An initial DA Form 3355, dated 6 November 1996 awarded the applicant 728 promotion points. The applicant signed the document indicating that the administrative points were accurate and correct.

He was promoted to pay grade E-6 effective 1 April 1997, with the same date of rank.

In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personal Command (PERSCOM) advised that Army policy provides that the addition of points not previously documented will be made during the month the request is received at the PSB and inputted into the system. The scores become effective the first day of the third month following the selection month. The applicant processed his promotion point adjustment on 20 February 1997 and his adjusted score became effective on 1 May 1997. PERSCOM recommended denial of the applicant’s request.

DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1. There is no evidence that the applicant attempted to receive credit for his educational improvement on his initial DA Form 3355. Rather, by his signature, he certified the listed administrative points were correct.
2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION : The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE :

GRANT

GRANT FORMAL HEARING

DENY APPLICATION




                                                      Karl F. Schneider
                                                      Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710074C070209

    Original file (9710074C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: That had the Personnel Services Battalion (PSB) properly credited his DD 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet), with 10 points for educational improvement, he would have met the promotion cut off score for 1 March 1997. An initial DA Form 3355, dated 6 November 1996 awarded the applicant 728 promotion points. In an advisory opinion to the Board (COPY ATTACHED), the Total Army Personal Command (PERSCOM) advised that Army policy provides that the addition of points not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711009

    Original file (9711009.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, retroactive promotion to pay grade E-5 effective 1 April 1997 and adjustment of his selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). His DA Form 3355, dated 1 January 1997 awarded the applicant 465 promotion points. Apparently, during a subsequent review, it was determined that the applicant’s DA Form 3355 was not accompanied with the proper paperwork to support the promotion points awarded for ranger training and the Ranger Tab and he in fact did not meet the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710522

    Original file (9710522.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She contends that the Personnel Service Battalion (PSB) wrongly removed 41 promotion points from the recomputation of her DA Form 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet) for August 1995. The applicant’s was granted 881 promotion points on her initial DA Form 3355, dated 10 August 1992. Under civilian education she was granted a total of 48 promotion points, 41 points were earned at Orleans Technical Institute.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710522C070209

    Original file (9710522C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    She contends that the Personnel Service Battalion (PSB) wrongly removed 41 promotion points from the recomputation of her DA Form 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet) for August 1995. Under education the 41 promotion points previously awarded from the Orleans Technical Institute were removed. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to pay grade E-6 effective 1 March 1996 with a same...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508222C070209

    Original file (9508222C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests retroactive promotion to Staff Sergeant, pay grade E-6 effective 1 January 1994. APPLICANT STATES: He states, in effect, that his southwest Asia service, worth four promotion points, was overlooked by the promotion NCO upon his initial promotion point computation in November 1992, and because these points were not awarded, he did not meet the cutoff score for promotion in February 1993, and was not promoted in January 1994, immediately after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067506C070402

    Original file (2002067506C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The promotion recommended list for the promotion of enlisted personnel for the Tampa Recruiting Battalion, dated 24 August 2001, confirm that the applicant was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5 and that she had attained 638 points. The personnel administrator concludes that it should be the MPD’s responsibility to correct this problem, but instead of meeting this responsibility, they require the applicant to apply to this Board for correction of military records. The Chief, Promotions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057517C070420

    Original file (2001057517C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reconsideration of his application to show he was awarded 10 points for education improvement and promotion to the rank of staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6), effective 1 July 2000. On 7July 1999, the applicant went before a promotion board and was awarded 751 promotion points. The Board concurs with the PERSCOM advisory opinion that the adjustment of the applicant’s promotion points from 751 to 741 and his being awarded 1 point for civilian education was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710531

    Original file (9710531.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was granted 575 promotion points on his July 1997 DA Form 3355. The Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) in a comment to the Board advised, in effect, that their review of the case confirms the applicant’s contentions and recommended granting the applicant’s request. Had the PSNCO timely processed the promotion paperwork in June 1997 the applicant would have met the promotion point cut-off score for promotion to pay grade E-5 for 1 September 1997.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710531C070209

    Original file (9710531C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, retroactive reevaluation of his promotion points and promotion to pay grade E-5 effective 1 September 1997. He was granted 575 promotion points on his July 1997 DA Form 3355. Had the PSNCO timely processed the promotion paperwork in June 1997 the applicant would have met the promotion point cut-off score for promotion to pay grade E-5 for 1 September 1997.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510648AC070209

    Original file (9510648AC070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reconsideration of his previous request to correct his promotion points worksheet (DA Form 3355) to reflect that he was awarded “200” promotion points by his commander and that he was awarded “46” promotion points for military education. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military...