Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610968C070209
Original file (9610968C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that the effective date of his promotion be changed from 28 February 1991 to 30 May 1990, the same day as his date of rank (DOR).  He states that the 81st Army Reserve Command (ARCOM) amended the order promoting him to pay grade E-7 to change his DOR to 
30 May 1990, but did not change the effective date of his promotion.  

3.  The applicant was promoted in the Army Reserve to pay grade E-7 by the 81st ARCOM on 1 March 1991, with an effective date and date of rank of 28 February 1991.  On 
29 October 1991 that command amended the promotion order to change his date of rank to 30 May 1990.

4.  Army Regulation 140-158 provides policies and procedures for the promotion of Army Reserve soldiers.  Paragraph 1-8 of that regulation states, in effect, that the DOR and effective date normally will be the same.  The DOR may be earlier than the effective date when the commander determines that a soldier should have been advanced earlier, but was not advanced due to an administrative error. 

5.  Paragraph 1-10 of the aforementioned regulation states, in effect, that the DOR on promotion normally will be the effective date of the order or the future effective date of the promotion.  The DOR may precede the effective date of promotion to correct an administrative error.  Pay and benefits will not be authorized for the period between the DOR and the effective date unless approved by the ABCMR. 

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was promoted to pay grade E-7 with a DOR of 30 May 1990.  The effective date of his promotion should also be 30 May 1990.

2.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to pay grade E-7 with a date of rank and effective date of 30 May 1990.                

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014902

    Original file (20080014902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Chapter 3 (Board Schedules and Procedures), Section III (Promotion Reconsideration Boards), paragraph 3-22 (Correction of military records as a result of a special selection board action), provides, if the report of a special selection board, approved by the President, recommends for promotion to the next higher grade an officer not currently eligible for promotion, or a former officer whose name was referred to it, the Secretary of the Army may act through the Army Board for Correction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019704

    Original file (20090019704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 November 2002, the Board advised the applicant that the records indicated he was a member of a TPU and his DOR and effective date for promotion to captain had been correctly established as 9 January 1999, the date he was assigned to a captain’s position. The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a second lieutenant and 4 years as a first lieutenant before promotion to captain. The evidence shows the applicant was appointed as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060223C070421

    Original file (2001060223C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to major (MAJ) under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) be corrected from 31 August 1998 to 20 May 1998. Chapter 1405 (Promotions), section 14304 of the ROPMA law, states that officers shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board far enough in advance of completing a specified maximum years (time) in grade (MTIG), so that if the officer is selected for promotion,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010544

    Original file (20140010544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request for: * promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), “effective 16 September 2011” with entitlement to back pay and allowances * placement on the Retired List in the rank of LTC vice major (MAJ) on his 60th birthday * correction of the applicant's mobilization DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 30 April 1991, to show his rank as LTC 2. Had he not requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9109333

    Original file (9109333.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was advanced to pay grade E-3 on 20 June 1990 under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, table 2-3, rule E. His DOR on the promotion instrument (DA Form 4187) is 23 January 1990. Paragraph 7-5 states that the DOR and effective date of promotion will be the same. The applicant’s effective date of advancement to pay grade E-3 should be 23 January 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013205

    Original file (20090013205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant's DD Form 214 issued on 20 July 1990 shows his correct rank, pay grade, DOR, and MOSC. Thus, the evidence of record indicates the applicant's discharge orders show the incorrect rank; however, the MOSC is correct. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, ARPC-PAT-R(N1), Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006163

    Original file (20080006163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his promotion effective date and date of rank (DOR) for captain (CPT/O-3) from 14 February 2005 to 4 October 2001, the date the President approved the June 2001 United States Army Reserve (USAR) Position Vacancy Board (PVB) and removal of his name from the November 2004 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The evidence shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to captain while assigned to paragraph and line number "260/03" by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084830C070212

    Original file (2003084830C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Paragraph (b) of 10 USC 14304 states, in effect, that an RC officer who is recommended for promotion to the next higher grade by a selection board the first time they are considered for promotion and who is placed on an approved promotion list shall (if not promoted sooner or removed from that list by the President or by reason of declination) be promoted, without regard to the existence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013391

    Original file (20080013391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a 2LT and 4 years as a 1LT before promotion to CPT. With respect to the applicant's DOR to CPT, the evidence of record shows that based on the maximum of 7 years of service as a 2LT and 1LT, the applicant's MYIG date for promotion to CPT was 30 May 1997. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing his effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608923C070209

    Original file (9608923C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant enlisted under a program that authorized a pay grade higher than E-1 at the time of enlistment. Specifically, he was enlisted in pay grade E-3 under rule E-2 which provided that since he was credited with thirty to fifty-nine semester hours of college credits he could be enlisted in pay grade E-3. In view of the foregoing, there appears to be no basis for granting the applicant’s request.