Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607245C070209
Original file (9607245C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 29 December 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) of 2B.

3.  The applicant states that at the time of his reenlistment on 29 December 1995, he was informed that he was not entitled to receive an SRB because he was not assigned to an authorized linguist “L” position.  However, he had been alerted that he was to attend the Serbo-Croatian Refresher course and was subsequently assigned to a linguist position in Bosnia, therefore he should have received the SRB for his military occupational specialty (MOS) of 97B.

4.  The applicant’s military records indicate that the applicant was identified on 11 December 1995 as a possible candidate to attend an 8-week Serbo-Croatian refresher training course.  On 27 December 1995 course assignment instructions were dispatched by the Department sending the applicant to the course beginning 16 January 1996.

5.  His records show that after serving 7 years, 7 months, and 24 days of total active service, the applicant, while serving at Fort Meade, Maryland, reenlisted on 29 December 1995 in MOS 97B, in the pay grade of E-5 for a period of 5 years.  His contract showed “no bonus entitlement.”

6.  On 1 February 1996 the Department dispatched instructions reassigning the applicant to Bosnia upon completion of his refresher training.

7.  The Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), in a comment to this Board, advised that an SRB-2B was in effect for MOS 97B with a language skill qualification identifier “L”, that the applicant was eligible to receive the SRB at the time of his reenlistment, and that his request should be approved.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was reenlisted without a bonus entitlement that has resulted in an injustice to him in that a bonus was available and he was qualified to receive it.

2.  Accordingly, it would be equitable and just to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was authorized to receive the SRB-2B that was in effect at the time he reenlisted on 29 December 1995. 

3.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below. 

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the 29 December 1995 reenlistment contract of the individual concerned to show that he was entitled to receive an SRB-2B in MOS 97B2L.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605175C070209

    Original file (9605175C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her reenlistment contract dated 13 May 1994 be corrected to reflect that she was authorized a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-3A. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted on 29 August 1990 for training as a counterintelligence agent (97B). At the time the applicant reenlisted to meet the service remaining requirements for an overseas assignment, it was not known that she would be occupying an airborne position (SQI “P”).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710055C070209

    Original file (9710055C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to an selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) of 2B. PERSCOM advised that MOS 98G with Korean was decreased from 2B to 1B, effective 4 January 1996. PERSCOM recommended granting his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710055

    Original file (9710055.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to an selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) of 2B. PERSCOM advised that MOS 98G with Korean was decreased from 2B to 1B, effective 4 January 1996. PERSCOM recommended granting his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606357C070209

    Original file (9606357C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 28 November 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted on 4 December 1995 with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-2B. The supporting statements from the applicant’s chain of command (lieutenant colonel to lieutenant general) all attest that the applicant was scheduled to reenlist on 22 December 1995 and that because he was hand-picked for deployment to Hungary, he was advised to reenlist...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605622C070209

    Original file (9605622C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 12 December 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted on 9 January 1996 for a period of 6 years instead of 4 years. It opined, in effect, that a SRB-1B had been authorized for the applicant’s MOS on 1 January 1996 and had the applicant applied for a waiver to reenlist under his 90-day window, an exception would have been granted. It goes on to state that personnel are not authorized to reenlist outside of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009628

    Original file (20080009628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. In the applicant and counsel’s request to grant the applicant pro rata of recoupment of any SRB already paid by installments based upon the percentage of service completed, counsel provides many in-depth trains of logic which address whether the applicant obtained his SRB through fraud, whether the applicant’s discharge from his erroneous reenlistment contract constituted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606948C070209

    Original file (9606948C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 6 June 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) of 1A. The applicant states that at the time of his reenlistment on 6 June 1995, he was informed that he was not entitled to receive an SRB. Accordingly, it would be equitable and just to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was authorized to receive the SRB-1A in MOS 74G that was in effect...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608483C070209

    Original file (9608483C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state that MOS 54B offered an SRB at the time and that he should be entitled to receive it. The applicant was improperly advised that he could reenlist for Army service school training in MOS 91B, when, by virtue of his promotable status, he was ineligible for such an option. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the 4 April 1995 reenlistment contract of the individual concerned to reflect that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511845C070209

    Original file (9511845C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that recoupment of the unearned portion of his selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) be stopped and that the debt be remitted. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are reclassified by the Department into a different MOS to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003665

    Original file (20090003665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ALARACT provided that in order to receive FLPP a Reserve Component Soldier must be certified proficient within the last 12 months in a foreign language for which the Department of the Army has a critical need and assigned to military duties requiring proficiency in the requisite language and performing the duties of the position. This regulation also requires certification by the Army within the past 12 months as proficient in a designated foreign language (in this case Hungarian). ...