Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606969C070209
Original file (9606969C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That he be paid either an enlistment or reenlistment bonus for his 7 January 1988 enlistment. 

APPLICANT STATES:  That he was informed at the time of his enlistment on 7 January 1988 that he was not entitled to any type of bonus.  However, since his enlistment he has talked to other soldiers with similar circumstances and was informed that he may be entitled to receive a bonus. 

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

The applicant’s military records show that the applicant initially enlisted on 27 January 1983 and served until he was honorably released from active duty in the pay grade of E-4 on his scheduled expiration of term of service of 26 January 1987.

On 7 January 1988 the applicant again enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years.  His enlistment contract contains no authorization for a bonus of any type.

In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) which opined that enlistment bonuses are not paid to prior service personnel and that there were no reenlistment bonuses authorized for the applicant’s MOS at the time the applicant enlisted.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.



2.  The applicant was considered a prior service enlistee at the time he enlisted on 7 January 1988 and as such was not entitled to enlist under the Army Cash Bonus Enlistment Option.

3.  Notwithstanding the fact that the applicant did not qualify for a reenlistment bonus at the time he enlisted on 7 January 1988, there was no reenlistment bonus offered for his MOS at the time he enlisted.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request. 

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063226C070421

    Original file (2001063226C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be paid a 1.5B Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in conjunction with his reenlistment on 31 July 2001. The applicant’s military records show that he initially served in the Regular Army from October 1985 to July 1988. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was eligible for and was authorized a 1.5B SRB at the time of his reenlistment on 31 July 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071825C070403

    Original file (2002071825C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his 1998 3-year reenlistment bonus be reinstated, and that he be given a second 3-year reenlistment bonus. As for the applicant's request for a second reenlistment bonus, he has not submitted any reason why he was not given a bonus upon the completion of his 1998 three-year reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606346C070209

    Original file (9606346C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be given a reenlistment bonus. APPLICANT STATES: When he reenlisted he was told that although both his unit and his skill were on the list of those approved to receive bonuses, the Army did not have the money to pay bonuses at that time, but he would be paid a bonus if and when money became available. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He enlisted in the USAR in pay grade E-1 with no prior service on 25 August 1986.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072881C070403

    Original file (2002072881C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: It states, in pertinent part, that the Enlistment Bonus is an enlistment incentive offered to those enlisting in the Regular Army for duty in a specific MOS. Army Regulation 601-280 sets forth the basic authority for the Army Enlistment Program for all military personnel of the Active Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015555

    Original file (20080015555.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he is authorized the remaining $2,000.00 of his $9,000.00 cash bonus. The applicant's record contains a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding - U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program), dated 22 January 2002, which shows in pertinent part, that the applicant enlisted for 4 years and for the U.S. Army Cash Bonus. The available evidence shows the applicant enlisted for two enlistment bonuses for a total bonus...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079741C070215

    Original file (2002079741C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of her remaining Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitled to her in accordance with regulation. The applicant's DA Form 3340 (Request for Regular Army Reenlistment or Extension), dated 13 March 1991, shows that she reenlisted for the second time for a period of 6 years to satisfy her service remaining requirement for the AMEDD College Program. The applicant provided a copy of memorandum from the OTSG, dated 3 December 1991, Subject: Release from the AMEDD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013472

    Original file (20140013472.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides an Eligibility Bonus Work Sheet for AGR Bonus for Indefinite, undated, wherein it shows his adjusted basic active service date (BASD) was 30 August 2000, his ETS date had been 23 August 2006, he would reach 18 years of service on 30 August 2018, and the total time he would be paid the SRB was for 12 years and 7 days of service (date of 18 years of service minus reenlistment date, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000168

    Original file (20070000168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the bonus message in effect when the applicant enlisted shows the following: a $2,000.00 bonus was in effect for MOS 11X for a 3 year enlistment. AHRC recommended that the Board find in favor of the applicant's request for a total bonus payment of $6,000.00, the maximum bonus allowed for a 3 year enlistment on 12 March 2004. The evidence further shows that at the time of the applicant’s enlistment, there was no bonus available to the applicant under the College First Program,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012617

    Original file (20130012617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * after the CAARNG's incentive bonus scandal was publicized and the misconduct of Master Sergeant (MSG) Txxx Jxxxx was revealed, the CAARNG established the Incentive Task Force (ITF) to investigate all bonuses paid by the State * during his 12 continuous years of service in the CAARNG, he received a total of three (3) incentive bonuses (an $8,000 enlistment bonus in 2001, a $15,000 reenlistment bonus in 2007, and a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB) in 2008) * during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015219

    Original file (20130015219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to a $15,000 enlistment bonus and eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). The applicant provides: * memorandum from Headquarters, CAARNG, Sacramento, CA, subject: Notification of Termination/Recoupment of Incentives, dated 13 April 2012 * 2 memoranda from National Guard Bureau (NGB), U.S. Property and Fiscal Office for California, Mather, CA, subject: Incentive Notice of Indebtedness, dated 27 June 2012...