Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606346C070209
Original file (9606346C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That he be given a reenlistment bonus.

APPLICANT STATES:  When he reenlisted he was told that although both his unit and his skill were on the list of those approved to receive bonuses, the Army did not have the money to pay bonuses at that time, but he would be paid a bonus if and when money became available.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the USAR in pay grade E-1 with no prior service on 25 August 1986.  At that time he completed an addenda to his enlistment contract for a $2000.00 cash bonus.

He completed that enlistment, being awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of material storage and handling specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-5.

On 12 June 1994 he reenlisted for 6 years in pay grade E-5 with no bonus addendum included in his contract.

Army Regulation l35-7 only authorizes bonuses for nonprior service USAR enlistees and for reservists who are in an active status who either enlist or reenlist, as appropriate, in either a critical MOS or a critical unit, as designated and published by the Department of the Army, for at least 6 years.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  The applicant has not submitted any documentation which would substantiate his contention that either his unit or his MOS was on the list of those approved for a bonus.

2.  Regardless of whether or not the applicant was given erroneous information, a bonus is an incentive to reenlist, not an entitlement, and need not be offered.  Obviously, the applicant did not need any incentive to reenlist.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicantĀ’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090995C070212

    Original file (2003090995C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His six years of service Paragraph 7d states, "Under other disenrollment criteria established now or in the future by Army regulations, incorporated herein by referenceā€¦the Secretary of the Army or his or her designee may order him to active duty as an enlisted soldier for a period of not more than four years or, in lieu of being ordered to active duty, may require me to reimburse the United States through repayment of an amount of money, plus interest, equal to the entire amount of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010247

    Original file (20110010247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. The applicant was subsequently denied payment of the bonus because he exceeded the years of service provision stating that a Soldier could not have more than 10 years of service to receive such bonus. Accordingly, he should not have been given a 6-year contract or a bonus. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant should not have been given a 6-year reenlistment contract or a bonus.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017525

    Original file (20100017525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 September 2006 * the requirements of his contract required him to complete basic combat training, Officer Candidate School, Basic Officer Leadership Course II, and Military Intelligence Basic Officer Leadership Course III (MI BOLC III) * the Selected Reserve Officer Accession Incentive Program, Accession Bonus Addendum states "I shall receive a bonus of $10000 paid in one lump sum upon my successful completion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071825C070403

    Original file (2002071825C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his 1998 3-year reenlistment bonus be reinstated, and that he be given a second 3-year reenlistment bonus. As for the applicant's request for a second reenlistment bonus, he has not submitted any reason why he was not given a bonus upon the completion of his 1998 three-year reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011090

    Original file (20130011090.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant received a $10,000.00 OAB and $12,000.00 under the SLRP. (2) If the applicant had been receiving the SLRP, she would not have been eligible for the OAB. Having already enlisted, the applicant was not eligible to receive SLRP at the time she did; therefore, the $12,000.00 should be recouped.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605316C070209

    Original file (9605316C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: That his unit was added to the list of units eligible for a SRIP bonus prior to his reenlistment. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He enlisted in the Army Reserve Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 28 June 1983 in pay grade E-1. Army Regulation l35-7 only authorizes SRIP bonuses for nonprior service USAR enlistees, and for reservists who are in an active status, who either enlist or reenlist, as appropriate, in either a critical MOS or a critical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013329

    Original file (20090013329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Senator, the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) and the DA G-1 have denied his request for payment, citing that he was not eligible for the bonus at the time of his commissioning. The Deputy Director informed the Senator that the applicant was not eligible for the Officer Accession Bonus due to the fact that his AOC of 35D was not on the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) eligibility roster at the time he signed his enlistment contract. The Deputy Director informed the Senator that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012617

    Original file (20130012617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * after the CAARNG's incentive bonus scandal was publicized and the misconduct of Master Sergeant (MSG) Txxx Jxxxx was revealed, the CAARNG established the Incentive Task Force (ITF) to investigate all bonuses paid by the State * during his 12 continuous years of service in the CAARNG, he received a total of three (3) incentive bonuses (an $8,000 enlistment bonus in 2001, a $15,000 reenlistment bonus in 2007, and a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB) in 2008) * during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510012C070209

    Original file (9510012C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    After 2 years of searching for a new unit without success, he was told that he had been eligible for a bonus as an instructor during the 2 years he had been looking for a new unit, but his MOS had then been removed from the SRIP list, making him ineligible for a bonus. Individuals who reenlist for a critical skill must have a valid position vacancy which requires the MOS authorized the SRIP, be MOS qualified for the position at the time of reenlistment, and be of the proper grade for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017756

    Original file (20090017756.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Deputy Director informed the Senator that the applicant was not eligible for the Officer Accession Bonus due to the fact that his AOC of 35D was not on the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) eligibility roster at the time he signed his enlistment contract. The Chief of the Congressional and Special Actions Branch informed the Senator that the applicant's request to receive the Officer Accession Bonus was disapproved by the approval authority within USARC due to the fact that he...