Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03065
Original file (PD-2014-03065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2014-03065
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE    BOARD DATE: 20141028
SEPARATION DATE: 20081028


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSGT/E-5 (3E671/Operations Management Craftsman) medically separated for a heart condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a temporary L2 profile, was placed on restricted duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The heart condition, characterized as “coronary artery disease,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Informal PEB adjudicated “myocardial infarction, status post coronary artery stent placement,” as unfitting, rated 10%, referencing the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) and the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting heart condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20080806
 VA - (4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Myocardial Infarction 7006 10% Coronary Artery Disease 7005 10% 20090304
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 90528 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Heart Condition. The CI first presented with chest pain in July 2004. He was hospitalized for one day due to mildly elevated cardiac enzymes. His stress test at that time was normal. He was discharged with a diagnosis of “chest pain, no compelling evidence of coronary artery disease.” On 26 November 2007, the CI presented to the emergency department with reports of severe left chest pain, left arm pain, sweating, nausea, vomiting and shortness of breath. His cardiac examination was normal except for mild tachycardia. Laboratory tests revealed elevated d-dimer indicative of clot break down and elevated cardiac enzymes. The CI was admitted and diagnosed with a heart attack (septal anteroseptal myocardial infarction). He underwent a cardiac catheterization on 27 November 2007 with findings consistent with a complete occlusion of the one of the arteries of the heart (left anterior descending artery) due to a clot (thrombus). The clot was removed and a stent was placed with documentation of excellent angiographic result. The CI underwent a second catheterization on 28 November 2007 to ensure the patency of the stent due to continued reports of chest pain. The stent was noted to be widely patent. The CI underwent cardiac rehabilitation. Perfusion imaging performed on 16 March 2009, approximately a year and a half after cardiac catheterization, demonstrated an ejection fraction of 55% (low normal), no evidence of scarring and questionable mild left ventricular dilatation. The narrative summary examination dated 23 January 2008 noted that the CI was doing well and without recurrence symptoms. The cardiac examination was normal except for sinus bradycardia (slow heart rate). An addendum dated 30 July 2008 noted an ejection fraction of 65% (normal) and mildly decreased movement (hypokinesis) of septal and anterior wall. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed 4 months after separation, the CI reported that he was asymptomatic and could walk a mile. The cardiac examination was normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the myocardial infraction, status-post coronary artery stent placement condition as unfitting with a disability rating of 10%, coded 7006 (myocardial infarction). The VA rated the condition at 10%, coded 7005 (coronary artery disease). The Board considered whether there was evidence for a higher than 10% disability rating. There were no further cardiac hospitalizations, no emergency department visits for cardiac issues, and the CI was asymptomatic with stent placement and anticoagulation/cardiac medications. Although there was evidence of decreased muscle movement at the site of the infarction and mention of questionable mild left ventricular dilatation, the ejection fraction (blood pumped out of the left ventricle to supply the body) was normal and the CI was asymptomatic. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the myocardial infraction, status-post coronary artery stent placement condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the myocardial infraction, status-post coronary artery stent placement condition and IAW VASRD §4.104, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140627, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record









                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAF/MRB
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX :

 Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-03065.
After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.
         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.
                                                               Sincerely,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00191

    Original file (PD2013 00191.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It, and any other conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.In accordance with DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00022

    Original file (PD2010-00022.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB found the arteriosclerotic heart disease unfitting, and rated it 10% IAW the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). After heart attack #5 I was told that because I could not deploy I was now considered a liability to the Army. I was told that continuation of service to fulfill my 20 yrs.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00757

    Original file (PD2012 00757.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1200757BRANCH OF SERVICE: ArmyBOARD DATE: 20140225 Coronary artery disease (CAD) . Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00321

    Original file (PD 2014 00321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. There were no reports of angina recorded in the examinations proximate to the CI’s separation (after a medication change), use nitroglycerine,faintness, or an exercise tolerance less than 10 METS. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00254

    Original file (PD2011-00254.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The service ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. In addition to any condition determined to be unfitting by the PEB, the Board’s recommendations are confined to those conditions determined to be unfitting at the time of the CI’s...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00427

    Original file (PD 2012 00427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre -Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam AV Block, 2nd Degree Pacemaker 7015 10% Mobits Type II Heart Block S/P Pacemaker Placement 7015 60% 20050727 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x 4 20050727 Combined: 10% Combined: 70% Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20061222 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The Board concluded that the evaluation done by the cardiologist as part of the MEB exam, a month prior to separation, was the most probative...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01149

    Original file (PD-2014-01149.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “exertional chest pain” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014250

    Original file (20140014250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an increase of his Army disability ratings for his pulmonary conditions (Sleep Apnea with Emphysema and Coronary Artery Disease) awarded by his Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). f. The PEB found his medical conditions following medical conditions met retention standards and were not listed in the physical profile: g. The PEB recommended he be separated for permanent disability retirement with a combined rating of 70%. f. Four electrocardiograms, dated 9...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00927

    Original file (PD2011-00927.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the history of chest pain with EKG evidence of a septal infarct and sinus arrhythmia condition and the asthma condition as unfitting, rated 0% and 0% respectively, with likely application of DoDI 1332.39 and the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The VA coded the CI’s combined respiratory conditions (asthma and OSA) as 6602-6847 at 50% IAW VASRD §4.96 (a) and stated “The law requires when certain respiratory conditions coexist, a single...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00134

    Original file (PD-2013-00134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Cardiac exam was normal.As noted above, the Air Force PEB and the VA both assigned a disability rating of 10% for the heart condition. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the...