Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02004
Original file (PD-2014-02004.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-02004
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150416
DATE OF PLACEMENT ONTO TDRL: 20021015
DATE OF REMOVAL FROM TDRL: 20040519


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Electrical Fuel System Repair) medically separated for asthma. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “bronchoconstriction” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “asthma - exertion related” as unfitting, rated 30%, with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) . The CI made no appeals and was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Approximately 2 years later, the IPEB adjudicated the asthma condition as unfitting, rated 0 % with likely application of the VASRD. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Final PEB – 20040220
 VA Rating Decision1 - 20050603
TDRL Placement – 20021202
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating
Proximate
Condition
 TDRL
Placement		 TDRL Removal TDRL
Placement
 TDRL2 Removal
Asthma 6602 30% 0% Asthma 6602 N/A 0%
Other x 0
 Other x 2
RATING: 30% → 0%
 RATING: 0%
1. Most proximate to TDRL Placement
2. Non-compensable evaluation due to failure to show for scheduled examination.
3. PEB r ating for TDRL removal based on C&P exam dated 20040113, ~4 mos. pre-TDRL removal


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Asthma. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) noted that in May 2001 the CI presented with symptoms of dyspnea (shortness of breath), chest tightness, cough, and dyspnea after running. The CI was a smoker and stated that he had been working at the Post battery shop over the past year, where he had been exposed to a lot of fumes. At the time of evaluation by pulmonary medicine (lung specialist) on 2 August 2001, baseline spirometry showed an FEV1 (forced expiration over one second) at 3.69 liters (82% of predicted), FVC (total air expelled) at 5.07 (95% of predicted), and an FEV1/FVC ratio of 73%. After exercise the FEV1 decreased by 22%. The pulmonary physician noted the significant decrease in FEV1 with exercise and diagnosed exercise-induced bronchospasm. The CI was prescribed Flovent (inhaled corticosteroid, an anti-inflammatory medication) and Albuterol (a bronchodilator). Due to persisting symptoms limitation to avoid fumes he was unable to function as a fuel and electric systems repairer and was referred for MEB. At the MEB examination on 10 July 2002, 5 months prior to TDRL placement, the lungs were “normal” (breath sounds normal on auscultation), and a chest X-ray was normal. The examiner stated, “Uses MDI [multi-dose inhaler] (Flovent, Ventolin).” At the time of the MEB NARSUM examination on 24 September 2002, the CI reported he did not feel that he could perform his MOS duties because he worked around fumes and there was poor ventilation where he worked; could not wear the protective mask, and could not perform the 2-mile run for his physical fitness test. Listed medications included Flovent and Proventil however the CI stated that his symptoms had not improved since being placed on medication. On examination the lungs were clear without wheezing. The MEB NARSUM referred to the spirometry performed in August 2001. At a VA pulmonary examination on 13 January 2004, 13 months after TDRL placement and 4 months prior to removal from TDRL and permanent disability disposition (TDRL removal), the CI reported that he had discontinued his medication after returning to the northeast area of the U.S., and had no significant pulmonary symptoms (although he continued to smoke). He had recently tried running 0.75 miles with 10 pounds of equipment and had no difficulty with wheezing or shortness of breath. Pre-bronchodilator spirometry showed FEV1 at 3.63 liters (81% of predicted), FVC at 4.96 (93%), and FEV1/FVC ratio of 73% (no significant change after bronchodilator). This VA examination was used by the PEB for its final disability determination in lieu of a separate military examination.

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation for TDRL placement based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition under code 6602 (Asthma) at 30%, citing the use of daily inhaled corticosteroids, and pulmonary function that was essentially normal on treatment (noting the reduction in the FEV1 with exercise). The VA found the condition to be service-connected, but did not assign a rating because the CI failed to report for a scheduled VA examination. The Board found that the CI had been prescribed (and was apparently using) daily inhaled corticosteroids, which supported a 30% rating under code 6602 (FEV-1 of 56%-to 70% predicted, or; FEV1/FVC of 56% to 70%, or; daily inhalational or oral bronchodilator therapy, or; inhalational anti-inflammatory medication). A higher rating was not supported by spirometry values, a history of visits to a physician at least monthly for required care of exacerbations, or courses of systemic (oral or parenteral) corticosteroids. The Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the asthma condition at TDRL placement. Next, the Board turned its attention to the permanent (final) rating at TDRL removal. The VA C&P examination was performed on 13 January 2004, 4 months prior to TDRL removal, and was discussed above. The service did not accomplish a separate MEB examination. The PEB rated the condition under code 6602 at 0%, noting that the CI was not taking any medication for asthma, had an FEV1 of 81% of predicted (from the C&P exam), and had recently run 0.75 miles with a 10-pound weight without difficulty. The Board noted that the FEV1/FVC ratio of 73% supported a 10% rating under code 6602. A higher rating was not supported by spirometry values, a history of visits to a physician at least monthly for required care of exacerbations, or courses of systemic corticosteroids. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the asthma condition at TDRL removal.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the asthma condition at TDRL placement, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the asthma condition at TDRL removal, the Board unanimously recommends a permanent disability rating of 10%, coded 6602 IAW VASRD §4.97. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
TDRL PERMANENT
Asthma 6602 30% 10%
COMBINED
 30% 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140502, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150013517 (PD201402004)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                    Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                    (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01964

    Original file (PD-2013-01964.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. He requires close medical follow-up, and consideration should be given to TDRL status.”On 4 January 2004, the CI was placed on the TDRL with a rating of 60%. The CI’s asthma was not severe enough to justify a higher...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01076

    Original file (PD-2012-01076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The MEB physical exam noted clear lungs and the medications and PFTs are summarized above. Allergy/Immunology clinic follow‐up the month after the MEB continued the diagnosis and is summarized above.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02634

    Original file (PD-2013-02634.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20050808VA* - based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Asthma66020%Asthma660210%STR**Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 5 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01602

    Original file (PD-2013-01602.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DATE OF PLACEMENT ON TDRL: 20030706Date of Permanent SEPARATION: 20040720 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the asthma condition and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01908

    Original file (PD-2013-01908.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20040617 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00234

    Original file (PD2013 00234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (shrapnel wound to the right upper arm, which met retention standards) to the PEB.The PEBadjudicated “asthma…” rated at 30%and placed the CI on the Temporary Retired Disability List (TDRL) in order for the condition to be stabilized by treatment.The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was placed on the TDRL in November, 2004, where he continued to receive medical treatment. The Board’s...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00244

    Original file (PD2011-00244.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Asthma Condition . FEV1 (% Predicted)113%(VA 70%) 75%FEV1/FVC98.9%67%Medsalbuterol inhaler (as needed, 2-3 x/day); begin budesonide inhaler;budesonide inhaler twice daily, albuterol inhaler (as needed) - 2-3 times per dayfluticasone & salmeterol twice daily, albuterol inhaler … as needed, uses 2x/day if forgets other inhalersSpirometry NotesPositive methacholine challenge; no significant change after bronchodilatorreturned to normal after bronchodilator§4.97 Rating30%30%30%The service...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD 2011 01084

    Original file (PD 2011 01084.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    TDRL Rating Chart Final Service IPEB – Dated 20021001 VA – All Effective Date 20030911 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam On TDRL – 20010813 TDRL Sep. Asthma 6602 30% 0% Asthma 6602 30%* 20031023 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The PEB rated the condition as 6602 asthma, bronchial and assigned a 30% disability stating the asthma condition was only moderately controlled on multiple medications, including daily inhaled anti-inflammatory aerosols. RECOMMENDATION: The Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00263

    Original file (PD2009-00263.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB’s DA Form 199 dated 20050413 indicated “Asthma, with normal spirometry, on intermittent inhalational bronchodilator therapy.” The PEB specified “Medication profile shows no controller medication between March – April 2004 and 15 February 2005.” The PEB permanent separation rating was 6602 at 10%; and the VASRD 10% criteria contains the phrasing “intermittent inhalational or oral bronchodilator therapy.” There is therefore no evidence that the provisions of DoDI 1332.39 were applied. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01313

    Original file (PD2013 01313.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends no change in the TDRL-entry rating of 30%, and a rating of 30% for the asthma condition at the time of permanent separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...