Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01795
Original file (PD-2014-01795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01795
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141217
SEPARATION DATE: 20090219


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Counterintelligence Agent) medically separated for a left knee condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent U2L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The left knee condition, characterized as “chronic left knee pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded three other conditions (bilateral wrists, frequent headaches and chronic facial dermatitis) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic pain and instability, left knee” as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting and therefore not ratable. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “All Conditions”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.












RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20081107
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Pain and Instability, Left Knee 5257 20% Left Knee Strain, S/P Open Reduction Internal Fixation 5258-5260 10% 20090407
Bilateral, Negative Ulnar Variance with Restricted Wrist Ranges of Motion Not Unfitting Residuals, Right Dorsal Wrist Ganglionectomy 5215 10% 20090407
Frequent Headaches Not Unfitting Migraine/Cluster Headaches with Visual Disturbance 8100 0% 20090407
Chronic Facial Dermatitis Not Unfitting Seborrheic Dermatitis 7899-7806 0% 20090407
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 0
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 90622 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Knee Condition. The treatment record indicated the CI first injured his left knee (while running) in September 2005. During the next 19 months (September 2005-April 2007), he re-injured his left knee two additional times and underwent two separate orthopedic stabilization surgeries with removal of adjacent inflammatory tissue. Despite aggressive physical therapy and rehabilitation, his knee pain and feelings of instability remained and was referred for an MEB. He was not recommended for a third surgery. At the narrative summary exam performed 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported a constant (2/10) ache in his left knee made worse with activities. Additionally, he endorsed randomly “give-way” of the left knee. The examiner noted “The knee symptom that bothers [CI] the most is the sensation of instability, the feeling that he is constantly about to fall to the left. Instability can occur at any time, even if he is standing in one place or walking.” The MEB physical examination (PE) noted non-painful normal range-of-motion (ROM), normal strength and intact sensation to the lower extremities. The knee was stable without clinical evidence of instability. X-rays performed in November 2007 revealed post-surgical and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive changes without evidence of acute boney abnormalities. The diagnosis was chronic, left knee pain and instability with traumatic arthritis after injuries to the ACL and posterior cruciate ligament. The commander’s statement implicated the CI’s inability to maintain fitness and alertness level given his present physical condition. His permanent profile listed left knee pain with instability as one of two diagnoses. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 7 April 2009 (6 weeks after separation) the CI reported occasional give-way and swelling of his left knee. The PE revealed non-painful normal ROM and a normal gait. Instability tests were positive on the left knee. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.
DOS 20090219
Left Knee ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20080926)
 VA C&P ~2 Mo. Post-Sep
(20090407)
Flexion (140 Normal) 140 140
Extension (0 Normal) 0 0
Comment - (+) instability tests
§4.71a Rating 0% 10%-20%
invalid font number 31502
The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Board members first considered and agreed that the C&P exam findings best reflected the knee condition closest to the time of service separation, and therefore assigned it higher probative value in its deliberations.
The PEB assigned a 20% rating under code 5257 (Knee; other impairment) citing moderate internal derangement with instability, whereas the VA dual coded with 5258-5260 (cartilage, semilunar dislocated-leg, limitation of flexion) and assigned a 10% rating citing painful motion. While there was no evidence of compensable limitation of motion, the Board agreed that the PEB’s 20% rating was supported under the 5257 code by sufficient evidence of subjective “give-way” symptoms coupled with objective clinical correlation to instability testing. Members also considered a dual code to include the single 10% rating under 5259 (cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic), but in this case, the surgeries did not involve semilunar cartilage (meniscus) material. Absent ankylosis or evidence of boney malunion or nonunion, there were no alternative or analogous coding options that would benefit the CI than the PEB’s current rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left knee condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the bilateral, negative ulnar variance with restricted wrist ROM, frequent headaches, and chronic facial dermatitis were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. All three conditions were not implicated in the commander’s statement nor judged to fail retention standards. All were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that any of these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the any of the contended conditions and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended bilateral, negative ulnar variance with restricted wrist ROM, frequent headaches, and chronic facial dermatitis conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.











The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 201401795, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150009531 (PD201401795)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03635

    Original file (PD-2014-03635.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic pain right knee, dueto patellofemoral syndrome” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00614

    Original file (PD2011-00614.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Shoulders (Left and Right) Condition . In the matter of the “pain left elbow, left wrist, shoulders (bilateral), and left knee; (sleep disruption)” condition, the Board unanimously recommends that the left wrist condition and sleep disorder be determined as not unfitting, and that it be rated for multiple separate unfitting conditions as follows: left elbow condition coded 8616, rated 10% IAW VASRD §4.124a and VASRD §4.71a. Right Shoulder (Major) Pain with Recurrent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00563

    Original file (PD-2014-00563.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain5299-523710%Chronic Low Back Strain523710%20050706Left knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals L/Knee Lateral Meniscus Repair, Chondromalacia Patella5259-501410%20050706Other x 0 (In Scope)Other x 1 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050811 ( most proximate to date of separation) Low Back Pain Condition . The CI complained of dull constant pain in the left joint line and pain behind the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02156

    Original file (PD-2013-02156.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20031020VA*ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals Left Knee Arthroscopy w/ RPPS*10%*Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other VA Ratings: RAD 30%; R Knee 10%; L Wrist 0% Combined: 0%Combined: 50% No VA rating decisions nor the Compensation and Pension (C&P) evaluationswere in evidence. DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of post-separation VA findings, particularly within 12 months of separation, although the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02363

    Original file (PD 2014 02363.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB also adjudicated surgical scar of residual of amputation 5th ray, moderately disfiguring, persistent digital neuroma and loss of grip strength secondary to 5th ray resection as Category II (contributing to unfit) conditions. It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition to rating the 5th digit...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01939

    Original file (PD-2014-01939.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left knee pain . The Board determined that, since the left knee was implicated in the Physical Profile (DA Form 3349), and in the commander’s performance statement dated 10 May 2004, it was appropriate to document the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00163

    Original file (PD2012-00163.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA coded 8100 (Migraine Headaches) and rated 30%. The CI is right-hand dominant who sustained multiple shrapnel wounds, multiple blast injuries from an IED explosion to include a flesh wound ( a soft tissue injury of his left forearm) measuring 8 cm x 8cm with flexor tendon, ulnar artery and radial nerve damage for which he underwent a protracted operative repair. The VA first rated scar, left distal forearm 20% with code 5228 (Thumb, limitation of motion) IAW §4.71a—Schedule of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01186

    Original file (PD-2014-01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. Bilateral Knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01365

    Original file (PD-2013-01365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At retention physical dated 4 September 2002, the examiner documented a prior history of bilateral hip osteoarthritis, a 2001 right hip replacement, and noted “decreased ROM left hip” (no measurements were documented). Thus, the Board cannot recommend a separate service rating for this condition. In the matter of the osteoarthritis bilateral knees condition, the Board unanimously determined that neither knee was separately unfitting and that the condition EPTS and was not permanently...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01737

    Original file (PD-2013-01737.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain Status Post Meniscal Repair5099-50030%Postoperative Residuals, Left Knee lateral Meniscal Tear Repair525910%20050727Other x 0 (Not In...