Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01744
Original file (PD-2014-01744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01744
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141218
SEPARATION DATE: 20081009


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Fire Repair specialist) medically separated for right forefoot injury. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right forefoot injury condition, characterized as “right foot metatarsalgia” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated right forefoot injury condition as unfitting rated 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Consider all conditions found unfitting and not unfitting by the physical evaluation board.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20080804
 VA - (7 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Forefoot Injury 5279 10% Right Foot Strain w/Plantar Fasciitis 5284 10% 20090518
Other x0
 Other x4 20090518
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 90805 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )




ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Forefoot Injury Condition. In July 2006, the CI suffered a crush injury to her right foot when it was run over by a motor vehicle tire. All radiographic exams including plain film X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging studies were normal. She was treated with immobilization and by physical therapy, pain medicine (steroid injections and oral medications) without a resolution of her pain. She was issued custom shoe inserts that produced fair pain relief and she was able to walk more comfortably. She also had electromyography/nerve conduction studies of both legs that were normal. The narrative summary prepared approximately 4 months prior to separation noted constant right foot pain primarily on the sole of her mid foot and heel area, sometimes on the top of the foot. The pain was described as a constant, 5/10 dull achy pain at rest, that increased to 8/10 with exertion or standing greater than 10 minutes. Examination of the right foot revealed tenderness of the plantar surface (sole) at the mid foot and heel. She had a normal arch with no structural abnormalities and normal pulses, strength and reflexes. Ankle range-of-motion (ROM) was plantar flexion 30 degrees (45 degrees normal) and dorsiflexion of 10 degrees (20 degrees normal).

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 7 months after separation, the CI reported continued right foot pain. She reported the following functional impairments: She could not walk long distances. On a good day she could walk up to a mile and on a bad day she was home bound. Her pain was relieved by rest and by oral narcotic medications which allowed her to function. The physical exam revealed a normal gait with moderate tenderness of the plantar surface right foot. There was no weakness, swelling, atrophy or instability. The ankle ROM was normal and the examiner specifically noted “Morton's Metatarsalgia is not present.” Weight bearing and non-weight bearing plain film X-rays of the right foot were normal.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB applied VASRD code 5279 (anterior Metatarsalgia [Morton’s disease]), and rated it 10%, the only rating level for that code. The VA applied code 5284 (other foot injuries) and also rated it 10% consistent with “moderate.” The Board noted that the CI’s condition was the result of an acute injury rather than Morton’s disease which is a neuroma located in the interspace between the metatarsal heads and is most commonly associated with overuse. Board members agree that the CI’s impairment is best coded under 5284 (as applied by the VA) and is copied below for the reader’s convenience:

5284 Foot injuries, other:
Severe .................................................................. 30
Moderately severe ................................................ 20
Moderate .............................................................. 10
NOTE: With actual loss of use of the foot, rate 40 percent.

As rating under code 5284 requires assigning subjective levels of impairment, the Board uses the following criteria as a starting point for deliberations to provide consistency across all deliberations:

Moderately severe disability connotes significant joint muscle etc damage or deformity and pain with minimal use, imposing limitations on some critical tasks mobility and routine activities.
Moderate disability connotes significant or near constant pain with functional limitations on some occupational tasks and domestic chores; but little interference with routine activities, and no interference with essential activities of daily living.
Mild or Slight disability is a reasonable characterization for impairment or pain not resulting in at least moderate functional limitations as described above; generally interfering only with relatively strenuous or non-essential activities.
As all objective radiographic evidence was normal, the CI’s gait was normal, and she did experience some relief with shoe inserts, Board members agreed that her disability did not reach the moderately severe criteria as required for the next higher 20% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right forefoot pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right forefoot Injury condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140414, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




        
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150009535 (PD201401744)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01176

    Original file (PD2010-01176.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the chronic right foot pain due to Morton’s neuroma condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Although there were examination findings of hallux valgus and hammer toes (single toes) there were no symptoms or impairment attributed to these abnormalities that would warrant rating under VASRD codes 5280 or 5282, and, if rated using these codes, would not attain a minimum...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01894

    Original file (PD2012 01894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : “Medical Board combined Right and Left conditions as one and left off pes planus from diagnostic evaluation. All members agreed, however, that separate ratings (unilateral or bilateral) under separate codes was not compliant with VASRD §4.14 (avoidance of pyramiding), which specifies that “the evaluation of the same manifestation under different diagnoses are to be avoided.” Specifically a separate compensable rating for pes planus, as contended by the CI and conferred by...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00083

    Original file (PD-2012-00083.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the bilateral metatarsalgia condition as unfitting, rated 10% for each foot with application of the bilateral factor for a combined 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Thiscondition was noted in the NARSUM and MEB and was clinically tied to the CI’s bilateral unfitting foot condition(s). Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01956

    Original file (PD-2013-01956.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Metatarsalgia527910%Bilateral Pes Planus527610%20050106Other Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 4 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01239

    Original file (PD-2014-01239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PEB coded the left foot Injury condition as 5284 (other foot injuries) and rated at 10% for “ moderate.” The VA considered the left ankle sprain, s/p talus fracture with residual plantar fasciitis and rated at 20% for “…for marked limited motion of the ankle.” The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01728

    Original file (PD-2013-01728.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Foot Pain and Dysthesias5099 500310%Neuropraxia of the Right Foot with Plantar Fasciitis andMetatarsalgia8599-852410%20040915Neuropraxia of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01314

    Original file (PD 2012 01314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON: Service FPEB – Dated 20020205 VA Exam (one day pre-sep) All Effective Date 20020426 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam RUQ Pain 8799-8719 10% Abdominal Adhesions w/ Chronic Abdominal Pain 8799-8719 10% 20020424 Plantar Fasciitis, Heel Spurs with Right Calcaneous Stress Fracture 5099-5022 0% B/L Pes Planus w/ B/L Plantar Fasciitis 5276 10% 20020424 B/L Heel Spurs 5015 10% 20020424 Mild Stress Incontinence Not Unfitting Stress...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01495

    Original file (PD2012 01495.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI then returned with left foot pain and was diagnosed by bone scan in June 2001 to have another metatarsal stress fracture; she was again treated. The VA rated the right foot pain and the left foot pain separately, each as 5299-5284 (analogous to other foot injury) at 10% (moderate), combined with bilateral factor to 20%. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130009110 (PD201201495)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02297

    Original file (PD-2013-02297.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. A provider note from April 2005 (10 months prior to separation) states, “Achilles symptoms are self-manageable per patient, but primary complaint is surgical site foot pain.” TheAchilles condition was never profiled. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00967

    Original file (PD2011-00967.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bones as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The condition pes planus as requested for consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, is addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting conditions of bilateral stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bones. In the matter of the...