Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01520
Original file (PD-2014-01520.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2014-01520
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army         BOARD DATE: 20141121
SEPARATION DATE: 20050705


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (88N10/Transportation Management Coordinator) medically separated for a back condition. The back could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty; however, she performed an alternate event for the annual physical fitness test. She was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “thoracic back pain, chronic”, was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain” as unfitting, rated at 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI non-concurred with the IPEB findings and recommendations thus requested a Formal PEB (FPEB). The FPEB review the IPEB proceedings and affirmed the IPEB’s findings and ratings. The CI concurred with the FPEB and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in her application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20050404
 VA – (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5237 10% Post-Traumatic Changes, Thoracic Spine 5010 10% 20050520
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 20050520
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50809 (most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Back Pain. In September 2003, the CI initially injured her back in a motor vehicle accident. In January 2004, she re-injured her back during a road “ruck road march.” In spite of conservative treatment the CI’s back pain persisted and she was referred to MEB. The MEB physical examination on 30 December 2004, the examiner noted tenderness to palpation in the right thoracic region, from the level of T4 to T6, but the midline of the back was without tenderness. The CI was able to heel-toe walk and duck walk, deep tendon reflexes were 2+ bilaterally however the thoracolumbar range-of-motion (ROM) was omitted.
During the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 20 May 2005, the CI reported that her back pain did not interfere with ordinary lifting or carrying items and she could sustain heavy physical activities without immediate distress. The examiner noted that posture and gait were normal. Physical examination of the back revealed normal spinal curvature, with no paraspinal muscle spasm. There was no muscle atrophy. Straight leg raise was negative bilaterally. Neurological exam (sensory and motor) was normal. There was no radiation of pain with movement and ROM was normal. The examiner wrote: “No pathology is identified on physical examination to render a diagnosis.” The ROM measurements from that evaluation are shown in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)
 VA C&P ~ 6½ weeks Pre-Sep
(20050520)
Flexion (90 Normal)
 90
Extension (30)
 30
R Lat Flexion (30)
 30
L Lat Flexion (30)
 30
R Rotation (30)
 30
L Rotation (30)
 30
Combined (240)
 240
Comment
 Normal ROM

The Board carefully reviewed all available evidence and directed attention to its rating recommendation. The Army PEB and the VA chose different coding options for the back condition, but both issued a 10% disability rating. The Board determined that the VA C&P examination in May 2005 was less than 2 months prior to separation therefore, it had significant probative value and also that the thoracolumbar ROM was normal. The Board determined that the CI’s back condition was essentially non-compensable based on the VASRD §4.71a General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine. However; IAW VASRD §4.40 (functional loss) and §4.59 (painful motion), when part of the musculoskeletal system becomes painful on use, it must be regarded as seriously disabled. A 10% rating is warranted when there is satisfactory evidence of functional loss and disability due to painful motion. There was no path to a higher rating since there was insufficient evidence of a significantly disabling back abnormality that would justify a higher rating. After due deliberation, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% was appropriate. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the back pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic low back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.






The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140313, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record









                          
         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         President
         DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150007572 (PD201401520)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01977

    Original file (PD-2014-01977.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic neck pain” and “chronic low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%, respectively, for a combined 10% disability, with likely reliance on AR 635-40 for rating. Disk protrusions were noted to decrease from 2005 through 2007 and the mild dilatation of the central thoracolumbar spinal canal (Syrinx) was stable.At the MEB exam, the CI reported back pain exacerbated by activity and rare left leg pain. In the matter of the back condition, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01616

    Original file (PD-2013-01616.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was considered to have a stable condition, “not likely to get any better with or without surgery…since his symptoms were so minimal (without loading his back with his weight on his shoulders).” Physical examination was not recorded and the physician indicated range-of-motion (ROM) measurements would be completed by physical therapy.The initial IPEB sent the CI’s case file back to MEB for further evaluation. Physical examination noted normal gait, painful motion of the thoracolumbar...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01730

    Original file (PD-2013-01730.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA rated the service connected chronic back condition as degenerative arthritis of the spine (5242-5003) at 10% citing painful motion.Although the PEB and VA used different codes, both codes are rated under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine, based on limitation of thoracolumbar ROM. In the matter of the chronic back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a.There were no other conditions...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02109

    Original file (PD-2014-02109.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. A pain specialist opined that thoracic and lumbar spondylosis and myofascial pain were the causes of the back pain, although imaging studies of the thoracic spine were normal. In the matter of the chronic thoracolumbar back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02144

    Original file (PD-2013-02144.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB for PEB adjudication.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic pain, right small finger; right inguinal pain of neuralgia and chronic thoracolumbar back pain”as unfitting, rated at 0%, 0%and 0% respectively.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Additionally, the Board considers VA evidence within 12 months of separation only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation. The PEB coded the condition...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01287

    Original file (PD-2012-01287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate disability rating for each of the two chronic back pain conditions. Based on the evidence in the treatment record, the Board unanimously agreed that the CI’s thoracic back condition was best described as “moderate.” There was insufficient evidence in the treatment record to support classifying the thoracic back condition as “severe.” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01045

    Original file (PD2011-01045.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. Neurosurgical notes do not indicate whether the scoliosis noted on x-rays was developmental in nature, due to the L1 vertebral fracture, or due to muscle spasm. Based on this ROM examination, the VA granted an additional 10% rating for back pain in accordance with the VASRD general rating formula for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00261

    Original file (PD-2014-00261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Herniated Disc L4-5 with DDD524320%Lumbar Spine Strain523740%20070829Sciatic Nerve with L1-4 RL Radiculopathy852020%20070829Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x920070829 Combined: 20%Combined: 90%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20071023 (most proximate to date of separation) invalid font number 31502 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00405

    Original file (PD-2012-00405.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IPEB adjudicated the chronic LBP condition as unfitting, rated 10% using VASRD code 5241. The rated condition for chronic LBP is the only condition that meets the Board’s purview for review. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE RATING 5241 COMBINED 10% 10% Chronic Low Back Pain UNFITTING CONDITION The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00779

    Original file (PD2012-00779.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), based on ratable severity at the time of separation. The VA’s second 0% rating under 5295 is not eligible for consideration as a second compensable rating, since separate thoracic and lumbar disability cannot be distinguished by the Army or VA evidence. RECOMMENDATION: The...