Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01730
Original file (PD-2013-01730.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-01730
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140710
SEPARATION DATE: 20051123


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (64D/Armament/Electrical/Avionic Systems) medically separated for a back condition. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic back pain, due to lumbar degenerative disc disease,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Formal PEB (FPEB) adjudicated chronic back pain as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39. The CI appealed to the US Army Physical Disability Agency, which affirmed the FPEB finding and rating.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below. Any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service USAPDA – Dated 20050909
 VA* - (8.1 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disc Disease 5299-5242 0% Degenerative Disc Disease w/ Loss of Lordotic Curve 5242-5003 10% 20060724
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 9 20060724
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 40%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 200 61115 (most proxima te to date of separation (DOS))
** Rating increased to 40% effective 2009 derived from VARD 20090828



ANALYSIS SUMMARY: IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

Chronic Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disc Disease . The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

“
Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 PT 4.9 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20050628)
 VA C&P 8.1 Mo. Post-Sep
(20060724)
Flexion (90 Normal) 90 (110/105/110) 90
Extension (30) 30 (25/27/27) 30 (35)
R Lat Flexion (30) 30 (30/32/33) 30
L Lat Flexion (30) 30 (25/27/30) 30 (35)
R Rotation (30) 30 (45/42/44) 30 (35)
L Rotation (30) 30 (42/41/43) 30 (35)
Combined (240) 240 240
CommentsFull pain-free AROM” Painful motion
Tenderness
§4.71a Rating 0% 1 0% *
invalid font number 31502 * invalid font number 31502 IAW §4.59 (Painful motion)

The examination records indicate a history of back pain since 1995 and the CI reported a 10-year history of low back pain (LBP) during disability evaluation. During 2004 the CI passed the physical fitness test in July and October. A 21 May 2004 clinic encounter recorded LBP for a month. A 2 December 2004 clinic encounter recorded LBP for 3 months with tingling in the left leg. At a clinic appointment 10 February 2005 the CI reported a 1-year complaint of LBP with radiation into the buttock. X-ray of the lumbar spine on 10 February 2005 showed mild degenerative disc disease (DDD). A 14 March 2005 spine magnetic resonance imaging showed DDD with L5-S1 disc protrusion, foraminal compromise and mild to moderate nerve root compression. At the 5 May 2005 orthopedic surgery appointment, for bulging discs and foraminal stenosis, the CI complained of lower back pain (rated 1-2 on the 10 scale). The diagnosis listed L5-S1 DDD with no radicular complaints. The CI was not deemed a surgical candidate and orthopedic surgery issued a temporary physical profile for lumbar degenerative disc. The MEB history and physical examination performed on 10 June 2005 (recorded on DD form 2807 and DD form 2808), noted CI report of chronic LBP since February 2004 without specific injury. Pain was increased with prolonged standing and associated with radiation of pain down the left leg with prolonged standing. The CI denied numbness or tingling. On examination, there was tenderness of paraspinal muscles. There was “no limitation of movement.” Gait was normal, lower extremity strength and reflexes were normal and straight leg raising was negative for radicular signs. At the 28 June 2005 physical therapy MEB examination, the CI complained of LBP with left lower extremity symptoms. He reported constant dull aching 2/10 LBP with intermittent sharp pain. On physical examination, the CI demonstrated full pain-free active ROM recorded in the chart which was not limited by pain. In the 6 July 2005 MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), the CI complained of 2-4/10 dull back pain which was moderate in severity. The chronic pain was exacerbated by flexion, extension and movement; relieved with rest. On physical examination, the CI demonstrated full active ROM with pain in lumbar flexion and extension. Bilateral lower extremities showed 5/5 strength and normal deep tendon reflexes (2+).

At the 24 July 2006 VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 8 months post-separation, the CI reported constant 1/10 LBP with exacerbations to 5-6/10. He reported flare-ups, lasting 1 to 2 days, at least one to two times per month. Episodic flare-ups were so severe that he could not move or get out of bed. He had not been prescribed bed rest by a physician for his reported incapacitating episodes, nor received physical therapy. Exacerbations were caused by merely getting out of bed, twisting, turning, sitting longer than 30 minutes or walking greater than one half mile. Pain was relieved by rest, hot baths and analgesics. Physical examination showed normal posture and gait (native, heel, toe, tandem gait). The CI reported back pain with left hip full ROM. Documented spine ROM normal as recorded in the chart. There was pain reported at end ROM. Examination demonstrated lower back bilateral paraspinal muscles tenderness to palpation without spasms. Straight leg raise test (assesses sciatic nerve root compression/irritation a by herniated lumbar disc) was positive with pain radiating to left thigh. Loss of lordotic curve of the spine was noted on exam. Neurological examination documented intact sensation and reflexes. Diagnoses were listed as DDD and loss of lordotic curve on physical examination.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The FPEB rated the unfitting chronic back condition as degenerative arthritis of the spine (5299-5242) at 0%, citing absence of neurologic abnormality or limitation of motion. The VA rated the service connected chronic back condition as degenerative arthritis of the spine (5242-5003) at 10% citing painful motion. Although the PEB and VA used different codes, both codes are rated under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine, based on limitation of thoracolumbar ROM. The ROMs in both proximate examinations (MEB and C&P) were normal and did not attain a minimum rating based upon the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine. The higher 10% rating would require flexion of greater than 60 degrees but not greater than 85 degrees or a combined ROM of greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees for the thoracolumbar spine. The C&P examination supported a 10% rating based on the presence of tenderness and painful motion. There was no muscle spasm or guarding sufficient to cause altered contour or abnormal gait to support consideration of a 20% rating. The Board agreed a 10% rating was supported based on functional loss (§4.40) or painful motion (§4.59). The Board also considered rating the back condition using the VASRD formula based on incapacitating episodes due to intervertebral disc syndrome. The CI had intervertebral disc disease with intermittent lower extremity radicular symptoms. The criteria are based on the number of incapacitating episodes in the prior 12 months requiring bed rest prescribed by a physician. No documented physician directed bed rest was evident in the service treatment records or at the time of the MEB NARSUM or C&P examinations. There was no evidence of incapacitating episodes due to intervertebral disc syndrome for rating consideration. Finally, the Board considered if additional disability rating was justified for peripheral nerve impairment due to radiculopathy. The CI had intervertebral disc disease with intermittent reports of radicular pain (right then left lower extremities). The critical decision is whether or not there was significant motor weakness or sensory loss which would impact military occupation specific activities. The MEB NARSUM examination documented normal strength and reflexes and the C&P examination documented intact sensation, position sense, and normal reflexes. There was no evidence that motor weakness or sensory loss existed to any degree that could be described as functionally impairing. The presence of functional impairment, with a direct impact on fitness, is the key determinant to recommend any condition for rating as additionally unfitting. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic back pain condition (5299-5242).


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the chronic back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Back Pain 5299-5242 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131022, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150002628 (PD201301730)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02692

    Original file (PD-2014-02692.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Therefore, based on a thorough review of the evidence in the treatment record, the Board determined that, at the time of separation, a 20% disability rating was appropriate for the CI’s chronic back condition. BOARD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00800

    Original file (PD 2012 00800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. The PEB rated the CI chronic LBP 10% under code 5299-5237 (lumbosacral strain) citing the ROM examination from the 21 July 2003 reported in the MEB NARSUM showing flexion greater than 60 degrees. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Low Back Pain, Secondary to Degenerative...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02206

    Original file (PD-2013-02206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board also considered rating the back condition using the VASRD formula based on incapacitating episodes due to intervertebral disc syndrome. In the matter of the chronic back pain, without neurologic abnormality condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02384

    Original file (PD-2013-02384.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Back Pain Due To Lumbar DDD/Extruded Discs Condition . Pre-SepVA C&P 16 Days Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal)65Used ROM’s from PT exam60Combined (240)210210CommentPos. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02000

    Original file (PD-2013-02000.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050622 The Board considered that the MEB exam, although closest to the date of separation, did not align with the more severe disability picture and limited ROMs noted in the service treatment record through multiple treatment episodes. The PT and chiropractic exams, coupled with the continued limited motion noted on the DD Form 2808 closer to separation, provided reasonable doubt of greater ROM limitation than that documented at the NARSUM.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

    Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02760

    Original file (PD-2013-02760.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    All treatment notes in the STR addressed the two knees together and the MEB forwarded bilateral knee pain as not meeting retention standards.The Board agreed that the evidence in record reasonably supports that each knee was unfitting at the time of separation and eligible for service disability rating. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00747

    Original file (PD-2014-00747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA rated the condition analogously to code 5242 at 10%, citing the range-of-motion (ROM) measurements done at the C&P examination.The limitation of motion at the MEB examination supported the 20% rating adjudicated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01985

    Original file (PD-2014-01985.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the VASRD rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation thoracic and lumbar spine conditions coded IAW §4.71a are provided a single disability rating and thus the thoracic DDD and the lumbago (listed by the PEB as separate conditions) are subsumed in the §4.71a rating that follows. Since the disability due only to the left foot cannot be isolated by the clinical evidence or from the fitness implications of the bilateral condition, the Board consensus was that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02203

    Original file (PD-2013-02203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lumbar Spine Condition . The examiner noted that three repetitions did not further reduce the lumbar ROM.Radiographs of the lumbar spine showed the transitional vertebra with normal spine alignment and normal S1 joints.At the VA C&P peripheral nerves examination on 25 April 2009 the CI reported back pain that radiated down both legs, at times to the heels. The VA rated the lumbar spine DDD at 20%, coded 5242 and denied service-connection for radiculopathy.