Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00358
Original file (PD-2014-00358.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2014-00358
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army         BOARD DATE: 20150721
SEPARATION DATE: 20070222


SUMMARY OF CASE: The available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 ( M otor Transport Operator ) medically separated for chronic costochondritis . The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “chronic costochondritis”, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition ( Wol f f-Parkinson-White Syndrome) for PEB adjudication. The informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the chronic costochondritis as unfitting, rated 10%, citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION: The applicant makes no specific contention in his application. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20070118
 VA* - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Costochondritis 5099-5003 10% Chronic Costochondritis 6899-6817 0% 20070425
Other x 1 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 4 20070425
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70615 .




ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Costochondritis Condition. The service treatment record detailed that the CI was referred to the cardiology clinic in March 2006 for complaints of chest pain and palpitations, and underwent an extensive cardiac and pulmonary evaluation. He was diagnosed with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome (in which there is an extra electrical pathway between the heart's upper chambers [atria] and the lower chambers [ventricles], which causes an intermittent rapid heartbeat). He underwent radio-frequency catheter ablation of the WPW bypass tract in June 2006. The CI showed no evidence of recurrent arrhythmia after his ablation, but he continued to report palpitations that were similar to those prior to the procedure, and continued to have significant chest pain. He was evaluated with numerous non-invasive tests (including echocardiography and stress perfusion imaging) and Holter and event monitoring, which were all normal. The pain was nearly constant; was focused at the left border of the sternum (breast bone); was reproducible with palpation; and worsened with activities like prolonged sitting, running, jumping, lifting, wearing/carrying military gear, and bending/twisting activities. His pain was variously identified as chronic chest pain syndrome, etiology unknown; atypical chest pain; and chronic costochondritis; but was clearly differentiated from the WPW and coexisting gastro-esophageal reflux disease. The CI was unable to do his job without significant limitations secondary to this pain, and was referred to the MEB.

At a cardiology evaluation on 11 October 2006 (4 months before separation), the CI’s pain was “reproducible with palpation and worsened with activities like head movement, etc.” He continued to do limited physical training but these activities did not exacerbate his symptoms. He did not have associated dyspnea (shortness of breath), presyncope (feeling like he was going to pass out), syncope (passing out), edema (swelling, especially of the ankles), or weight gain. He could not put on his battle gear due to chest pain symptoms. On examination, there was tenderness on palpation at the left sternal border. A DD Form 2808, Report of Medical Examination, was also completed the month where the examiner reported the CI suffered constant chest pain after a 2-mile run several months earlier, and he could not tolerate pressure applied to the chest. However, lungs and chest were described as “Normal.” A DA Form 3349, Physical Profile, was generated and listed both WPW and non-cardiac chest pain as diagnoses of interest; although significant duty restrictions were listed, they could not be attributed solely to either condition. In a performance statement to the PEB, the CI’s commander did not attribute any specific duty restrictions to either condition.

At the narrative summary (NARSUM) on 18 December 2006 (2 months pre-separation), the CI reported that his symptoms got worse with activities such as prolonged sitting, running, jumping, wearing/carrying military gear, and bending/twisting activities. On examination there was consistently reproducible tenderness to palpation over the costochondral junction on the left over ribs 3-6. There was also tenderness to a lesser degree diffusely over the pectoralis major muscle. He had full active range-of-motion and normal strength of all extremities, and normal light touch sensation throughout.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed on 25 April 2007 (2 months after separation), the CI described no chest pain but confirmed tenderness in the morning or after resting on a couch, that improved with movement. Cough or chest movements did not cause pain. On examination, there was moderate tenderness over the costochondral joints of the upper sternum. The examiner wrote, “Estimate to what extent, if any, per veteran, they affect functional impairment during the flare-up. NONE.”

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition at 10%, analogously coded 5003 (degenerative arthritis), citing slight/constant pain and the USAPDA pain policy. After additional review of the case, the VA rated the condition at 10%, analogously coded 5297 (removal of ribs), stating that the functions affected, and the anatomical localization and symptoms, were closely related to those of chronic costochondritis. Review of the VASRD indicated that there was no specific code for costochondritis, so an analogous code had to be invoked. A higher evaluation of 20% was not supported under code 5297 unless two ribs have been removed, or under code 5003 unless there was X-ray evidence of involvement of two or more major joints or minor joint groups, with occasional incapacitating exacerbations. Rating under analogous code 5022 (periostitis) was not advantageous, as it is rated as arthritis, degenerative (code 5003). The Board also considered analogous code 5321 (thoracic muscle group) but noted that a higher rating of 20% (associated with severe or moderately severe disability) was not supported, as detailed in §4.56. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), and finding no pathway to a higher rating, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic costochondritis condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the chronic costochondritis condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the chronic costochondritis condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140106, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review





 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, AR20150015848 (PD2014 00358)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00154

    Original file (PD-2014-00154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chest/rib paincondition, characterized as “rib pain-chronic bilateral chest wall pain from costochondritis” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “chest wall/rib pain from costochondritis…”as unfitting, rated 10%with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00482

    Original file (PD-2012-00482.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB identified and forwarded only the chronic chest wall pain condition for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The VASRD in effect at the time of separation utilized the subjective criteria of slight, for a 0% rating; moderate, for a 10% rating and moderately severe or severe for a 20% rating for rating purposes under code 5321. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01001

    Original file (PD-2014-01001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Non-Cardiac Chest Pain .Although the CI’s pre-service medical history and physical exam forms are not available for review by the Board, the available evidence documents that the CI experienced intermittent chest pain prior to 2006. They also acknowledged that it existed prior to service but was permanently aggravated by military service beyond the natural progression of the disease. The VA rating decision stated:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00157

    Original file (PD 2014 00157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rating the condition as “moderate” would result in a 10% rating, no different from the ratings posted by the PEB and VA, so the Board considered whether the condition could be rated as “moderately severe” at 20%. During the 5 years prior to separation, the CI noted increasing pain, stiffness, decreased ROM and increasing difficulty performing required duties. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01104

    Original file (PD2013 01104.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was permanently profiled and continued on conservative management and physical therapy. Members agreed, therefore, that the pain of the rib cage and upper abdomen (costochondritis, aponeurotic neuritis and diastasis of abdominal rectus) conditions were not reasonably justified as separately unfitting; and, accordingly, they cannot be recommended for separate disability rating. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01020

    Original file (PD2013 01020.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The chest painand headache conditions, characterized as “chronic costochondritis” and “migraines with aura,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic costochondritis and migraine headaches”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%,referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy for chronic costochondritis and DoDI 1332.39 for migraine headaches.The CI made no appealsand was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00637

    Original file (PD2011-00637.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Formal PEB (FPEB) adjudicated the non-cardiac chest pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%; additionally, history of trauma to sternum with arthritic changes condition was considered category II, related but not separately unfitting. Cardiac causes for the chest pain were ruled out and although some significant gastroenterological conditions were noted, none contributed to the CI’s chest pain. While the initial and reconsideration PEBs determined the CI was fit for duty, an FPEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00884

    Original file (PD2011-00884.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the chest pain due to costochondritis condition as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Chest Pain Due to Costochondritis . The VA exam after separation indicated pain with motion and tenderness of the spine.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00763

    Original file (PD-2014-00763.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB examination performed on 10 March 2006, the CI reported chronic right shoulder pain, but denied knee pain. Painful motion was not recorded on the NARSUM (although it was recorded on the C&P.) BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02094

    Original file (PD-2013-02094.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A ROM evaluation was performed by physical therapy (PT) the following month, recording flexion of 15 degrees and exceedingly limited ROM in all planes;but, the therapist specified that the ROM limitations “could be part of the … brace that prevents him from using his back in the proper range.” The STR documents a cumulative 2 weeks of physician directed convalescent leave (separate 1-week periods soon after the injury), various entries confirming antalgic gait, none noting abnormal contour...