Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00330
Original file (PD-2014-00330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-00330
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141126
SEPARATION DATE: 20060614


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-3 (11C/Indirect Fire Infantryman) medically separated for right knee pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty but could perform a modified fitness exam. He was issued a permanent L3 and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right knee condition characterized as “right knee anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autograft,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “continued right knee pain and functional instability” as unfitting, rated at 20% . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I have consistently had knee pain & have been told by the VA doctors that there’s nothing they can do, in relation to having them fix & or help the pain. They have also told me that, due to surgery, I now have arthritis that I will have to deal with from now on. Additionally, since the surgery, right knee, I have constant pain in my left knee due to putting more weight and pressure on it. I am on daily painkillers & am contemplating knee replacement surgery in the future.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below. The requested arthritis and left knee conditions were not identified by the PEB, and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20060124
 VA - (~5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Knee Pain and Functional Instability, S/P Right Knee ACL Reconstruction, with Hamstring Autograft,
Lachman II-A		 5257 20% S/P Right ACL Surgery 5260 10% 20061120
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 20061120
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20061207 (most proximate to date of separation)


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed in the CI’s application regarding the significant impairment and worsening severity with which his service-incurred condition continues to burden him. It is a fact, however, that the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. This role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The Board utilizes DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. Post-separation evidence therefore is probative only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability and fitness implications at the time of separation.

Right Knee Condition. On 20 March 2005 the CI originally fell from training equipment and sustained a twisting type injury, with immediate swelling, to his right knee. Radiology test revealed a torn ACL which was surgically addressed on 17 July 2005 after a period of rest and immobilization. Despite physical therapy (PT), he continued with right knee pain and was referred for an MEB.

At the narrative summary examination on 9 December 2005 (6 months prior to separation), the CI reported right knee pain that was associated with any twisting or pivoting motion or with prolonged running. He additionally endorsed a feeling of instability described as a “functional instability.” The physical examination (PE) revealed tenderness and decreased range-of-motion (ROM). Significant instability was not elicited as there was “…very minimal pivot glide on exam.” (Lachman II-A = 5-10 mm of translation with a firm endpoint). There was no comment regarding painful motion, locking, subluxation, atrophy or the presence of an effusion. His pain intensity was described as “slight” and “occasional.” His diagnosis remained right knee ACL reconstruction with continued pain and functional instability. The commander’s statement indicated that the CI’s limitations did not prevent him from performing critical duties as a Soldier.

At the VA Compensation and Pension examination on 20 November 2006 (performed 5 months after separation), the CI reported a constant, aching, 8/10 right knee pain that was aggravated with activity and relieved with rest. The examiner stated, “At the time of pain [the CI] can function without medication. He states his condition does not cause incapacitation.” The PE revealed tenderness and painful limited motion. All cartilaginous and ligament instability tests were normal. The examiner noted, “There is no functional impairment resulting from the [right knee] condition.” His diagnosis was post-surgical ACL with scar. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.
DOS 20060614
Right Knee ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 7 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20051209)
VA C&P ~ 5 Mo. Post-Sep
(20061120)
Flexion (140 Normal) 120 110
Extension (0 Normal) 0 0
Comment tenderness painful motion ;
tenderness
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10 %

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 20% rating under code 5257 (knee; other impairment) citing post-surgical intervention with minimal instability upon physical testing. The VA assigned a 10% rating under code 5260 (leg; limitation of flexion) citing limited painful motion. In light of non-compensable ROM, Board members considered and agreed that the PEB’s 20% rating under code 5257 was presumably due to the Lachman’s instability test listed as II-A…equating to “moderate” impairment. The Lachman maneuver is a test to assess the amount of anterior tibial translation (ATT) there is within the knee in evaluating the integrity of the ACL. The action officer noted that the Lachman grading levels include I, II, and III corresponding to <5 mm, 5-10mm, and >10 mm of anterior translation and subset “A” or “B” for having a “firm” or “no endpoint,” respectively. Medical literature has documented that a degree of ATT (approx. 5-7 mm) can be normal. Board members agreed that the degree of instability in this case and noted on the prior to separation examination was not supported at a rating higher that the PEBs 20%; this was additionally supported in the post-separation examination where no instability was in evidence. Absent compensable ROM or abnormal boney union about the knee, the Board agreed that the PEB’s single rating coded as code 5257 was most appropriate and beneficial to the CI. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140111, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150007085 (PD201400330)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00135

    Original file (PD-2014-00135.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain/Instability Left Knee5099-500310%Left Knee Multi-Ligament Injury5010-525710%20070331Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 (Not in Scope)20070331 Combined: 10%Combined: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02134

    Original file (PD-2014-02134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Knee Condition . (Normal: 140 and 0 degrees).On an orthopedic exam on 7 May 2001, surgical incisions were well healed and the knee had no lateral instability (varus/valgus) but mild “laxity” at the ACL repair site (1A Lachman test).At the MEB/NARSUM evaluationon 25 June 2001, 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported a continued inability to walk or run without knee pain. Mild anterior laxity was again noted (1A Lachman test).ROM results are in the chart below.On the DD Form 2808...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01692

    Original file (PD-2014-01692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “traumatic osteoarthritis left knee, with OCD lesions, lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau, s/p ACL reconstruction and microfracture of left femoral condyle”as a single unfitting condition, rated 10%,with likely application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appealsand was medically separated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00622

    Original file (PD2012-00622.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Sep 135⁰ 0⁰ 140⁰ 0⁰ ROM additionally limited by pain; slight anterior subluxation with some instability 10% 10%* Left Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ Normal) Extension (0⁰ Normal) Comment §4.71a Rating 5099-5003 or 5010 5257 +painful motion and tenderness; 1A Lachman, +anterior drawer 10% 10%* *If instability conceded At the narrative summary (NARSUM) examination performed 3 months prior to separation (2 August 2002), the CI reported sharp anterior knee pain when twisting, and occasional swelling...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00820

    Original file (PD2011-00820.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Back Condition. Right Knee Condition . The right knee had normal ROM, and no evidence of ACL instability.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00772

    Original file (PD-2014-00772.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2014-00772BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20141030 Right Knee Pain Condition . The CI underwent right knee arthroscopy in June 2003 at which time a lateral meniscal tear was repaired, but no ACL tear was present.Follow-up right knee X-rays showed mild changes of osteoarthritis.Ongoing pain led to a second arthroscopy in November 2004 that involved operative repair of cartilage lesions; the ACL...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00481

    Original file (PD-2014-00481.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board then considered whether there was sufficient evidence to support a 10% rating for functional loss (§4.40, §4.45).The MEB examination in January 2006 recorded a history of left knee pain “sometimes,” and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00848

    Original file (PD2012-00848.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the instability of left knee condition as unfitting, rated 10%. Instability of Left Knee Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION Instability of Left Knee, status post Left Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction VASRD CODE RATING 5257 COMBINED 10% 10% The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00834

    Original file (PD-2014-00834.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “left ACL tear,”as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39andVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01903

    Original file (PD-2013-01903.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The NARSUM rated the pain of the right knee as constant and minimal and the orthopedic surgeon diagnosed “postoperative knee pain and dysfunction due to internal derangement of the knee with residual instability.” The VA in its VARDdated 17 November 2005, 17 months after separation,made no reference to a separate C&P examination and cited the MEB examination and evidence of the STR. After due consideration and review of the evidence, the Board determined the right knee ROM did not rise to...