Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01903
Original file (PD-2013-01903.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01903
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140821
SEPARATION DATE: 20040620


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (63H10/ Track Vehicle Mechanic) medically separated for a right knee condition. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right knee condition, characterized as “postoperative knee pain and dysfunction,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic pain, right knee, status post (s/p) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction as unfitting, rated 0%, with cited appli cation of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below. Any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040315
 VA* - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Pain, Right Knee 5099-5003 0% Right Knee Disability 5257 NSC** STR
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 STR
Combined: 0%
 Combined: NSC
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 200 51117 (most proxima te to date of separation (DOS))
** Code changed to 5260 with rating 10% derived from VARD 20130903 effective 20120327


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Pain, Right Knee. The CI injured his right knee playing soccer in November 2001. He underwent right ACL reconstruction on 26 February 2002. He was enrolled in physical therapy after convalescence, but continued to report right knee pain. At his 5 November 2002 follow-up, the orthopedic surgeon recorded a knee examination described in the table below. A postoperative X-ray performed on 17 October 2003 noted appropriate healing after the knee surgery. An orthopedic clinic visit note on 9 December 2003 recorded full knee range-of-motion (ROM), 0 to 130 degrees and no instability. The CI reported occasional knee locking. The examining surgeon further noted that the CI reported progressively worsening anterior knee pain and weakness that allowed unlimited walking with a knee brace, aggravated with running and wearing a rucksack or flack vest. The examiner initiated a P3 profile and an MEB. On the DD Form 2807-1, Report of Medical History, prepared by the CI on 17 December 2007, he reported his right knee repair was unstable and locked when bent. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination completed by an orthopedic surgeon on 6 February 2004, 4 months prior to separation, recorded the examination in the table below. The CI reported pain with squatting, problems with climbing and jumping, and that standing or sitting caused the knee to lock. The NARSUM rated the pain of the right knee as constant and minimal and the orthopedic surgeon diagnosed “postoperative knee pain and dysfunction due to internal derangement of the knee with residual instability.” The VA in its VARD dated 17 November 2005, 17 months after separation, made no reference to a separate C&P examination and cited the MEB examination and evidence of the STR. The VARD stated the right knee condition was treated, finding only slight limitation of function with pain, lack of ligamentous instability and no X-ray evidence of boney abnormality. The VARD then noted that in the 17 months since discharge there was no evidence of treatment for a right knee condition.

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.


Right Knee ROM
(Degrees)		 Ortho 18 Mo. Pre-Sep (20021105) Ortho 16 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20030127) 		NARSUM 4.3 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20040206)
Flexion (140 Normal) 135 135 130
Extension (0 Normal) 0 0 0
Comment No effusion, NL pivot shift, no JLT, Lachman 1A, neg McMurray, min lat pain w/ varus stress, no instability consider P2 in 3 months No effusion; Good quad tone; No: Lachman’s, Pivot Shift, JLT, McMurray’s, instability. Sl pain Var stress; x-ray aligned tunnels, stable HW No: effusion, McMurray’s, pivot shift, anterior drawer, IA Lachman’s. Ant knee pain; Goniometer utilized; Slight constant pain cited
§4.71a Rating 0% 0% PEB 0% / VA NSC

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the chronic pain of the right knee using code 5099 rated analogously as code 5003, adjudicating a rating of 0%. The PEB described the pain condition as being s/p ACL reconstruction with a resultant IA Lachman’s test (best results possible for this surgery) and described a pain rating of minimal/constant. The VA denied service-connection for the right knee disability claim noting a lack of evidence of disability at the time of separation or requirement for treatment after separation. After due consideration and review of the evidence, the Board determined the right knee ROM did not rise to the level for a compensable rating using code 5260 or 5261 for limitation of flexion or extension of the knee. There was no evidence of ankylosis, lateral instability or removal of semilunar cartilage (surgical removal of a part of the cartilage cushion) to allow consideration of a rating under codes 5256, 5257 or 5259, respectively. The Board considered rating under code 5258 (dislocated semilunar cartilage with frequent locking) due to the subjective reports of locking; however, there was no objective evidence such as report from surgery or diagnostic imaging of loose joint cartilage that could cause joint catching to permit use of this code. The Board considered a rating using code 5003 IAW §4.59 and §4.71a and agreed there was a shortfall of full flexion by 10 degrees from normal with pain meeting the criteria for a rating of 10%. The Board found no other appropriate codes for consideration.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the right knee was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic right knee pain condition coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.59 and §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Pain, Right Knee 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130908, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150004690 (PD201301903)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00946

    Original file (PD-2014-00946.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active dutyE-4 (Health Care Specialist)medically separated for left knee pain.The left knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirementsof his Military Occupational Specialty.He was issued a permanent L3 profileand referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).“Chronic left knee pain”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00389

    Original file (PD2011-00389.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The multiply-operated left knee with anteromedial knee pain, subjective instability and mechanical symptoms condition, analogously coded 5299-5003, per VASRD direction, would warrant a 10% rating as given by the PEB and the VA. With non-compensable ROM...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00481

    Original file (PD-2014-00481.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board then considered whether there was sufficient evidence to support a 10% rating for functional loss (§4.40, §4.45).The MEB examination in January 2006 recorded a history of left knee pain “sometimes,” and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00217

    Original file (PD2009-00217.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unfitting ConditionsCodeRatingDateConditionCodeRatingExamEffective Degenerative Arthritis, Right Knee w/X-Ray Evidence500310%20011206Post-Operative Degenerative Joint Disease, Right Knee, w/some Narrowing of the Lateral CompartmentDegenerative Arthritis, Left Knee50030%20011206Degenerative Joint Disease, Left Knee5010 (List All PEB Conditions) The VA C&P exam does not mention any complaint of locking. After this evaluation, the VA increased the ratings for each knee to 20%.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01355

    Original file (PD-2012-01355.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Knee Pain Condition. The Board noted the PEB rated the knee condition using the code for knee instability (5257). The Board noted the MRI findings showing evidence of a deficient ACL and MEB NARSUM examination with a positive Lachman test graded 1+.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02745

    Original file (PD-2013-02745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left knee X-rayson 21 February 2007 were normal.At the MEB examination on 9 March 2007, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported constant knee pain. Notes in the STR indicated the CI was advised the right knee pain was due to compensation for the left knee injury. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01456

    Original file (PD-2013-01456.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam DJD,Bilateral Knees...[Surgical Residuals]500320%Left Knee DJD, post Meniscectomy5010-525910%20031208Right Knee DJD, post ACL Repair5010-526010%20031208Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 (Including 0% R and L Knee Surgical Scars)20031208 Combined: 20%Combined: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20040310 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Bilateral Knee Condition . In the matter of the combined bilateral knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01645

    Original file (PD2012 01645.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Persistent Anterior Knee Pain Condition .The CI originally had a sport-related injury to his right knee in September 2001.A torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was addressed arthroscopically in November 2001,followed by rehabilitative treatment.The CI re-injured his right knee (buckled and popped) while stepping from an aircraft in January 2002, and required a right ACLallograft reconstruction in March 2002.He did well post-operatively with progressive physical therapy (PT) until another...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00092

    Original file (PD2013 00092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as left knee severe degenerative joint disease (DJD), left knee anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, left knee lateral meniscus tear and medial meniscus tear, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. He had further knee re-injuries after the first two surgeries. The operative report described severe chondromalacial changes in the lateral compartment with osteophytic ridging in the patellofemoral joint, medial,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00622

    Original file (PD2012-00622.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Sep 135⁰ 0⁰ 140⁰ 0⁰ ROM additionally limited by pain; slight anterior subluxation with some instability 10% 10%* Left Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ Normal) Extension (0⁰ Normal) Comment §4.71a Rating 5099-5003 or 5010 5257 +painful motion and tenderness; 1A Lachman, +anterior drawer 10% 10%* *If instability conceded At the narrative summary (NARSUM) examination performed 3 months prior to separation (2 August 2002), the CI reported sharp anterior knee pain when twisting, and occasional swelling...