Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02492
Original file (PD-2013-02492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-02492
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140630
SEPARATION DATE: 20050503


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (63D, Turret Mechanic) medically separated for back pain. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Chronic lower back pain was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain status post L4-S1 lumbar interbody fusion without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 20%, w ith application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI wrote “due to passage of new laws in 2008.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050331
 VA - (>6 Years Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain s/p L4-S1 Fusion w/o Neurologic Abnormality 5241 20% Lumbosacral Spine Strain w/Degenerative Disc Disease 5242 20% 20110808
Other x 0 (Not is Scope)
 Other x 5 20110912
Rating: 20%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20 121018 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

The Board evaluates VA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. DoDI 6040.44 specifies a 12-month interval for special consideration to VA findings. Post-separation evidence, however, is probative only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation from military service.

Low Back Pain Condition. The CI first received trauma to his low back from a fall in 2001 and again in 2002 while lifting heavy objects. Radiologic examinations revealed lumbosacral degenerative changes with disc herniation at L4-5 and L5-S1 with mild central canal stenosis (slight pressure upon spinal cord elements). There was a paucity of source treatment documents in the record file, but summary notes indicated that the CI failed non-operative treatments to include pain medication, chiropractic care, spinal injections and physical therapy (PT). Secondary to persistent low back pain (LBP) with right-sided radiculopathy, he underwent a spinal fusion with implant on 13 September 2004. His surgery was uncomplicated and at 2 weeks post-op, his gait was normal and lower extremity pain symptoms were absent. At the MEB examination (6 weeks prior to separation), the CI reported a low grade (3 of 10 scale) LBP and the inability to wear body armor. X-rays noted good surgical implant positioning. His physical examination (PE) was brief and revealed a well-healed back scar and no motor, sensory, or reflex abnormalities in either leg. There was no comment in regards to a specific back examination, altered gait, or abnormal spinal curvature. Thoracolumbar range-of-motion (ROM) was decreased. He denied radicular symptoms. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed over 6 years after service separation, the CI reported near daily, moderate LBP (ache) lasting hours and associated with spasms, weakness and stiffness. Additionally, he reported “flare-ups” of severe LBP every 1-2 months lasting up to 1-2 days. The PE revealed normal gait and posture. ROM was moderately decreased with painful motion and Deluca was positive for pain. There was no guarding, tenderness, spasm, atrophy or weakness about the lumbar spine. He was neurologically intact. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 PT ~ 5 Mo. Pre-Sep
VA C&P ~ 6 Years Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 45 (40,45,45) 60
Combined (240) 200 210
Comment painful motion painful motion; DeLuca +
§4.71a Rating 20% 20%

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . Both the PEB and VA applied similar code s of 5241 (spinal fusion) and 5242 (degenerative arthritis) respectively , which is appropriate to the presenting pathology. The ROM findings rated by the MEB and VA were similar, each yielding 20% ratings under the VASRD §4.71a general spine formula. The Board also notes the earliest VA spinal evaluation was 6 years after the date of Service separation. IAW DoDI 6040.44 and the post-separation time reference, t he s ervice treatment record evidence was assigned exclusive probative value with respect to the Board’s recommendations. There was no evidence of incapacitating episodes to achieve a higher rating under an alternate rating code. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the lumbar spine condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131123, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150002936 (PD201302492)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01314

    Original file (PD-2013-01314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20040120 The Board considers VA evidence within 12 months only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.As discussed above, PEB reliance on AR 635-40 for rating the chronic low...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01781

    Original file (PD-2013-01781.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: Physical Disability Board of Review I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01170

    Original file (PD-2012-01170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the low back condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39. The 2002 Veteran Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed to the current §4.71a rating standards on 26 September 2003, and were identical to the interim VASRD standards used by the VA in its rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD 2011 00366

    Original file (PD 2011 00366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service IPEB – Dated 20031201VA - (2 Mos. The CI continued his post-operative care with both orthopedics and physical therapy for LBP.The commander’s statement indicated that the CI was able to perform duties in-garrison as a unit mail clerk;however he was not deployabledueto his inabilityto perform his MOS duties as an Infantryman.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination(obtained approximately 8 monthsprior to separation),contains documentation that the CI had marked and frequent LBP...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00992

    Original file (PD 2012 00992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200992 SEPARATION DATE: 20020722 BOARD DATE: 20130207 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (63B/Light Vehicle Mechanic), medically separated for low back pain (LBP) post L5/S1 fusion. The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication....

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01101

    Original file (PD-2012-01101.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020614 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Back Pain 5299-5295 10% L4-L5 Spondylolithesis s/p fusion 5299-5292 10% 20021227 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. VA radiographs (over 20 months after surgery) stated “There is wedging of L5. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI‘s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Back Pain After...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01074

    Original file (PD2011-01074.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Medical Records. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: VASRD CODE RATING 5293-5295 COMBINED 20% 20% Chronic LBP...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01588

    Original file (PD-2013-01588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI also attached a one-page statement to his application which was reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.In the matter of the chronic back pain s/p discectomy and fusion condition, the Board unanimously recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00744

    Original file (PD2012-00744.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW CASE NUMBER: PD1200744 BOARD DATE: 20130314 NAME: X BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20011115 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a U.S. Marine Corps active duty CPL/E-4(6531/Aviation Ordanceman) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). RATING COMPARISON: PEB – Dated 20010921 Condition Chronic Low Back Pain Left Lateral Leg...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02758

    Original file (PD-2013-02758.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20071123 Since then, he had noted re-aggravation of his LBP. The Board noted that the ROM for both the MEB and VA examinations supports a 20% rating, but the criteria for a 40% rating are not met.