Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01314
Original file (PD-2013-01314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01314
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140923
SEPARATION DATE: 20040120


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (63S/Heavy Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic) medically separated for low back pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The low back pain condition characterized as “status post L4-S1 interbody fusion for DDD” and was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “low back pain” as unfitting, rated at 10%, citing application of AR 635-40. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please see attached VA Form 21-4138 for issues and reasons for change for the section.”[sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting low back pain condition is addressed below and no additional conditions, specifically the knees as mentioned in the CI’s contention, are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20031002
 VA - (4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low Back Pain (LBP) 5241 10% Degenerative Disc Disease, L5-S1, s/p Laminectomy with Fusion 5241* 10% 20031217
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x6 (Not in Scope) 20031217
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40407 (most proximate to date of separation )
VARD dated 20140325 increased 5241 to 40% effective 20130222


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers VA evidence within 12 months only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

Low Back Condition. The CI had a long history of intermittent lower back pain that worsened in mid-2002. He had a magnetic resonance imaging study in May 2002 that revealed degenerative disc changes at L4-5 and L5-S1. The LBP did not respond to conservative treatment and by October 2002, the CI had undergone two epidural steroid injections and one facet block. His LBP persisted and he developed right sided radicular symptoms which was confirmed by electromyogram/nerve conduction (EMG/NCS) dated 24 Jan 2003. The EMG/NCS study documented a “…acute on chronic L4 radiculopathy affecting the right lower extremity….” He then underwent a discogram that produced concordant pain in the L4-5 disc with a “severe degenerative pattern” again confirming the CI’s radicular symptoms. On 30 April 2003 (approximately 9 months prior to separation), he underwent a surgical fusion of L4-5 and L5-S1.

The narrative summary (NARSUM) (prepared 5 months prior to separation), noted the CI underwent an L4-S1 posterior fusion on 30 April 2003. Since that time, the CI had satisfactory recovery and had stop taking his pain medication. The CI was neurologically intact but was limited somewhat in his activities, primary his capability to left heavy items or running. His day to day activities were tolerable without pain. The physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (performed a month prior to separation), the CI reported lower back ache, without radiating, that occurred only upon sitting or standing for long periods. The pain was located across the lumbar spine that was 6/10 in intensity and lasted the remainder of the day. He no longer took medications for his back; he just relaxed, stretched and followed his back hygiene program. He was working as a mechanic and there was no effect on usual activities except for avoiding sudden bending or prolonged sitting or standing. His back did not limit his ambulation; however, there was some decrease in motion and function during any flare-ups. The physical exam findings are summarized below.

The range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB ~ 5 Mo. Pre-Sep PT ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 1 Mo. P re -Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 10 50 90
Combined (240) - - 240
Comment Pos. painful motion; Normal strength, reflexes & sensation Bubble inclinometer used Pos. painful motion; Pos. tenderness to palpation; Normal strength, reflexes & sensation
§4.71a Rating 40% 20% 10 %

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and the VA applied VASRD code 5241 (spinal fusion), rated at 10%. The PEB referenced IAW AR 635-40, para B29e, which refers to use of passive ROM measurements verses active ROM measurements that’s used by the VASRD. The evidence supports that the CI’s thoracolumbar ROM improved after his spinal fusion, that a month prior to separation, his ROM was normal and that he no longer took any pain medications. Rating under the General Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine grants a 10% evaluation for “muscle spasm, guarding, or localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour” as documented on the VA C&P examination performed a month prior to separation.

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic low back pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on AR 635-40 for rating the chronic low back pain was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that regulation by the Board. In the matter of the chronic low back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130913, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record






                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150004176 (PD201301314)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02758

    Original file (PD-2013-02758.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20071123 Since then, he had noted re-aggravation of his LBP. The Board noted that the ROM for both the MEB and VA examinations supports a 20% rating, but the criteria for a 40% rating are not met.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01990

    Original file (PD-2013-01990.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain524110%Residuals Of Herniated L5-S1 Disk524120%20051128Other x0Other x2 RATING: 10%RATING: 20%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060207(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) Chronic Low Back Pain: The CI suffered a low back injury in September 2000 while lifting a heavy object at his civilian job. There is thus no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with fitness...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01781

    Original file (PD-2013-01781.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: Physical Disability Board of Review I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02492

    Original file (PD-2013-02492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Low Back Pain Condition . The ROM findings rated by the MEB and VA were similar, each yielding 20% ratings under the VASRD §4.71a general spine formula.The Board also notes the earliest VA spinal evaluation was 6 yearsafter the date of Service separation.IAW DoDI 6040.44 and the post-separation time reference, the service treatment record evidence was assigned exclusive probative value with respect to the Board’s recommendations. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00351

    Original file (PD-2014-00351.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00275

    Original file (PD2011-00275.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Chronic Low Back Pain with Fusion L4 to S1 Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01718

    Original file (PD-2013-01718.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain Following Lumbar Fusion524110%Status Post Lumbar Spine Fusion, with Retained Hardware at L4-5 and L5-S1, with Bone Grafting from Left iliac Crest and Left Sciatica (also Claimed as Numbness in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00068

    Original file (PD 2014 00068.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain with associated right leg and knee pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The VA rated the CI back conditions at 40% with code 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) for “forward flexion 30 degrees or less”.source MEB ROMs documented pain-limited forward flexion to 30 degrees (similar to the VA exam) and the Board found the similar measurements and disability ratings from these two exams close...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00719

    Original file (PD-2014-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic pain, due to lumbar fusion x2 and sacroilitis with muscle spasm and antalgic gait” as unfitting, rated 20% with likely application of the of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00570

    Original file (PD-2014-00570.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. Providing orders...