Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02369
Original file (PD-2013-02369.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      CASE: PD-2013-02369
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army         BOARD DATE: 20150424
SEPARATION DATE: 20040727


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Fire Support) medically separated for a left ankle condition. The left ankle could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Chronic left ankle pain s/p [status post] lateral reconstruction for instability” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (chronic low back pain [LBP] as medically unacceptable) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic pain, left ankle s/p lateral reconstruction” as unfitting, rated 10%, c iting application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The chronic LBP was adjudicated as not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI writes: “Ankle pain, had reconstruction with continued issues. Unable to carry rucksack. Recently had to get 2nd reconstruction, limp constantly. Unable to play sports, or do anything that applies pressure to ankle. Know no feeling in 1/2 foot.” The CI also included a two page letter with his application that was reviewed by the Board which addressed both the back and the ankle.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20040429
 VA* - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Left Ankle Pain 5099-5003 10% DJD, Left Ankle, Post Surgical Reconstruction 5010-5271 10% STR
Chronic Low Back Pain Not Unfitting Facet Dysfunction, L4-5 5299-5237 10% STR
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 2
RATING: 10%
 COMBINED RATING: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40730 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ) .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Left Ankle Pain. While performing physical training in February 2002, the CI sustained an injury to his left ankle. Persistent pain and ankle instability led to a surgical reconstruction of chronically torn ligaments in December 2002. Although ankle instability resolved after surgery, the CI experienced persistent pain that did not adequately respond to conservative treatment. X-rays showed degenerative changes of the ankle joint. The narrative summary (NARSUM) on 9 March 2004 (5 months prior to separation) noted ankle pain exacerbated by prolonged standing, running, jumping, stair climbing or high impact exercise. Examination showed non-tender ligaments and intact ankle stability. The surgical incision site was healed but tender. Ankle plantar flexion was 40 degrees (normal to 45 degrees) and dorsiflexion was “up to neutral” (i.e. 0 degrees; normal to 20 degrees).

At a VA evaluation on 9 December 2004 (4 months after separation) the CI was observed to have a normal gait. A VA orthopedist on 22 February 2005 (7 months after separation) reported that the left ankle displayed “full ROM” (range-of-motion) and no evidence of instability. Magnetic resonance imaging reportedly showed a normal ankle joint.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB relied on an analogous code 5003 (degenerative arthritis) for a 10% rating while the VA also assigned a 10% rating under a combination 5010-5271 code (arthritis due to trauma; limitation of ankle motion). Since there was no ankylosis present, rating under the 5270 or 5272 codes was not supported. The Board considered the ROM in evidence. A 10% rating is warranted for “moderate” limitation of motion and 20% rating for “marked” limitation of motion. Board members agreed that “moderate” limitation of ankle motion was reflected in the evidence, and therefore the 10% rating was justified on that basis. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic left ankle pain condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that chronic LBP was not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations requires a preponderance of evidence, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The CI developed LBP after falling off a truck in 2002 and required treatment with pain medication and physical therapy. According to the NARSUM examiner, LBP was exacerbated by heavy lifting, bending or prolonged standing, but symptoms were usually controlled with over-the-counter pain medication. Although the NARSUM described the pain as “mild” and “occasional in frequency,” the condition was deemed to be medically unacceptable. Examination showed no tenderness or painful motion. The NARSUM orthopedist reported that X-rays were uncertain regarding the presence of an L4 vertebral compression fracture. At the MEB exam the CI reported that LBP occurred daily. The examiner noted bilateral paraspinal tenderness, no spasm, and full ROM. The commander’s statement did not specify conditions that impacted duty performance, and the permanent profile named only the ankle condition.

Although the chronic LBP condition was deemed to be medically unacceptable by the NARSUM and MEB, it was not profiled or implicated in the commander’s statement. This condition was reviewed and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that chronic LBP significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance, nor were there physical examination findings which would logically be associated with significant disability. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination the chronic LBP condition and so no additional disability rating is recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating chronic left ankle pain was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by this Board. In the matter of the chronic left ankle pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determination as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131001, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150012435 (PD201302369)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA







Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02698

    Original file (PD-2014-02698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Various STR clinic entries throughout the course...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01692

    Original file (PD-2013-01692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Ankle Condition . Left Knee Condition . At the MEB examination on 20 January 2004, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported left knee pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01854

    Original file (PD-2013-01854.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB physical exam performed 5 months prior to separation noted tenderness to external rotation of the right hip joint, otherwise full ROM of both hips. Bilateral Knee Pain During the CI’s first period of service, he developed bilateral knee pain, underwent surgery on his left knee, and was medically separated for bilateral knee pain in 1999. Right Ankle Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01083

    Original file (PD2011-01083.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic right knee pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board noted that although the CI continued to have left knee pain, she was otherwise found to have normal examination. Ankle examination was normal.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01985

    Original file (PD-2014-01985.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the VASRD rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation thoracic and lumbar spine conditions coded IAW §4.71a are provided a single disability rating and thus the thoracic DDD and the lumbago (listed by the PEB as separate conditions) are subsumed in the §4.71a rating that follows. Since the disability due only to the left foot cannot be isolated by the clinical evidence or from the fitness implications of the bilateral condition, the Board consensus was that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02352

    Original file (PD-2013-02352.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active dutyE-4(Unit Supply Specialist)medically separated for left ankle pain.The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirementsof his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS).He was issued a permanent L3 profileand referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The “left ankle pain status post reconstructive surgery” was forwarded to the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02698

    Original file (PD-2013-02698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “left knee pain due to degenerative joint disease [DJD]” and “right ankle pain due to degenerative joint disease”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, citing application of the DODI and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain due to DJD5009-500310%Left Knee Residuals, S/P ACL … 5003-526010%20090831Right Ankle Pain due to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00053

    Original file (PD2013 00053.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA coded each knee individually and used the analogous code 5999-5014 asosteomalachia and rated at each one at 10%.The service treatment record (STR) contained an equal amount of documentation relative to the left or right knee with the majority of documentation pertaining to the bilateral knee pain with activities. The left ankle physical exam findings of dorsiflexion limited to 10degrees (normal 20 degrees).The C&P examiner documented that the CI had daily pain with activities in all...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00046

    Original file (PD2012-00046.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic right ankle and foot pain and lower back pain (LBP) were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Right Ankle/Foot Condition . Service Treatment Record

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00125

    Original file (PD2012-00125.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The subsequent USAPDA review in April 2008 readjudicated assigning a 20% rating; the CI was then medically separated with a 20% disability rating. The CI was treated with extensive physical therapy however he was not able to return to unrestricted duties in his MOS and beginning in April 2005, the CI was on duty limiting profile due to back pain. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as...