Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02001
Original file (PD-2013-02001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-02001
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150226
SEPARATION DATE: 20040312


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard E-6 (Heavy Vehicle Driver) medically separated for bilateral knee pain. The bilateral knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Bilateral chronic retropatellar pain syndrome (RPS) unresponsive to conservative measures was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions, “myofascial lower back pain” and “painful left great toe” characterized as “neuralgia of the left great toe with a soft tissue mass overlying the 3rd and 4th web space,” for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral chronic RPS” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040113
 VA - (4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Chronic Retropatellar Pain Syndrome
5003
10%		 Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Left Knee 5299-5260 0% 20040721
Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Right Knee 5299-5260 0% 20040721
Other x 2 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 8
Rating: 10%
 Combined Rating: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20041214 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Knee Pain: Treatment records evidence that the CI presented in February 2003 for radiographic evaluation of the right knee. The X-rays demonstrated mild degenerative changes of the tibial spine and patella. The CI was treated with physical therapy (PT), activity modification, and anti-inflammatory medications. A PT note dated 24 June 2003 documented the onset of left knee and foot pain. An orthopedic evaluation dated 29 August 2003 noted a history of bilateral pain since June 2003 with a diagnosis of bilateral anterior knee pain without evidence of degenerative joint disease (DJD) or meniscal tear. Radiographic evaluation confirmed the prior diagnosis of mild degenerative changes. An orthopedic fit for duty evaluation dated 22 February 2004 documented report of bilateral knee pain made worse with squatting and running. The physical examination was significant for bilateral patella entrapment. The examiner rendered a diagnosis of bilateral DJD. The narrative summary noted a history of bilateral knee pain. The pain was worse with prolonged sitting, stair climbing and running. On physical examination there was tenderness to palpation with patellar grind and tenderness over the patellar tendon. There was full active knee flexion range-of-motion (ROM) bilaterally without evidence of quadriceps atrophy. A diagnosis of bilateral chronic RPS unresponsive to conservative measures was rendered. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed 4 months after separation, the CI reported occasional slight discomfort (right greater than left) anterior knee pain with walking and some instability with climbing stairs. The knee examination demonstrated discomfort in the para-patellar area bilaterally without instability, swelling, or locking. A diagnosis of bilateral RPS was rendered.

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, along with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

“ “
“ “
Knee ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 5 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~4 Mo. Post-Sep
Left Right Left Right
Flexion (140 Normal) 145 145FROM”FROM”
Extension (0 Normal) 0 0FROM”FROM”
Comment Radiographic evidence of mild degenerative joint disease
§4.71a Rating 10% 0% 0%
invalid font number 31502

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the bilateral chronic RPS condition as unfitting with a disability rating of 10%, coded 5003. The VA rated the bilateral RPS at 0% for each knee. Although VASRD §4.71a permits combined ratings of two or more joints under 5003, it allows separate ratings for each compensable joint. IAW DoDI 6040.44, if the PEB combined adjudication is not compliant with the 5003 combined rating criteria, each condition subsumed under the single disability rating must be reasonably justified as separately unfitting in order to remain eligible for rating. In this case, a bilateral condition was profiled, determined to fail retention standards, and implicated in the commander’s statement. Members agreed that each knee was unfitting.

The Board then considered if the evidence supported a 10% or higher disability rating for each knee. There was no evidence of limitation of motion or painful motion (VASRD§4.59) for separate knee ratings. There was no evidence of occasional incapacitating episodes for 20% rating under VASRD code 5003. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), members agreed that a disability rating of 10 percent for the bilateral chronic retropatellar pain syndrome condition was appropriately recommended in this case.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the bilateral chronic RPS condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131023, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record







XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150011187 (PD201302001)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01519

    Original file (PD-2013-01519.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20040604Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals, Medial Meniscus Tear526210%STROther x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 Combined: 0%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060518(most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY : Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00969

    Original file (PD 2012 00969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic bilateral knee pain due to RPS condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00701

    Original file (PD-2014-00701.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain due to RPS5009-50030%RPS Right Knee526010%20030403RPS Left Knee526010%20030403Other x0Other x920030403 Combined: 0%Combined: 60%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20030725(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB combined the right and left knee conditions under a single Service disability rating, coded analogously to 5003. After due deliberation in consideration of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01855

    Original file (PD-2013-01855.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. Although the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01895

    Original file (PD-2013-01895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-500310%Retropatellar Pain Syndrome with Chondromalacia, Right Knee5099-501410%20040802Retropatellar Pain Syndrome with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01053

    Original file (PD2011-01053.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW The PEB and VA each rated the left and right knees at 10% each using the criteria of disability code 5003. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01921

    Original file (PD-2012-01921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded history of cellulitis, left knee, chronic bilateral hip pain secondary to bilateral iliotibial band friction syndrome, chronic mechanical low back pain, mild (less than a centimeter) left shorter than right limb length discrepancy, and mild bilateral pes planus conditions.The PEBadjudicated “left patellofemoral pain with secondary chronic left knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01601

    Original file (PD 2012 01601.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated chronic knee pain due to bilateral retropatellar pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. RATING COMPARISON: Service IPEB – Dated 20030404 VA - (4 Days Pre-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Knee Pain Due To Bilateral Retropatellar Pain Syndrome 5099-5003 0% Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Right Knee 5260 10% 20030414 Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00544

    Original file (PD2011-00544.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was diagnosed with retropatellar pain syndrome (RPS); and, did not improve adequately with conservative measures to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. The VA examiner specifically stated “there is no pain at limitations of motion of either knee.” In the matter of the bilateral knee condition, the Board by a vote of 2:1 recommends that each joint be separately adjudicated as follows: an unfitting left knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00367

    Original file (PD-2014-00367.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Knee Pain…5099-500310%Left Knee Chondromalacia Patella…5099-501410%20070808Chondromalacia Patella with Degenerative Changes, Right...