Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01519
Original file (PD-2013-01519.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.         CASE: PD-2013-01519
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141203
SEPARATION DATE: 20040716


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (31R/Multichannel Transmission Systems Operator, Maintainer) medically separated for bilateral knee pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty; however, her profile indicated she could take an alternate physical fitness test. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral knee pain condition, characterized as “chronic patellofemoral syndrome” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral knee” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “They disregarded depression when I was ordered by my 1st Sergant to a psychiatrist at Ft Leavenworth. I have also since required 2 more knee surgeries, back surgery and a blown neck. I had a documented care wreck during my time in the Army.” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting bilateral knee pain condition is addressed below; no additional conditions, to include the contended depression, back, and neck conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040604
 Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% Residuals, Medial Meniscus Tear 5262 10% STR
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 0
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60518 (most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Knee Pain Condition. Treatment records document that the CI had a history of right knee meniscal repair surgery prior to service. On 25 August 1998 the CI underwent a second right knee surgery for a meniscal tear with findings of abnormal patellar tracking. Treatment records were silent for knee pain until 1 July 2002 when the CI presented with right knee pain. She was diagnosed with retropatellar pain syndrome (patellofemoral pain syndrome). The CI was treated with physical therapy, activity modification and anti-inflammatory medications. The CI continued to report pain with activity and weight bearing. On 13 May 2003 the CI underwent arthroscopic right knee debridement with evidence of degenerative joint disease (DJD) and chondromalacia (flaking of retropatellar and medial femur cartilage). Approximately 3 months after arthroscopic surgery the CI reported bilateral retropatellar pain. She was diagnosed with right knee quadriceps tendonitis and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Despite 6 weeks of physical therapy the CI continued to report bilateral knee pain. The narrative summary examination dated 11 May 2004 demonstrated right greater than left decreased knee flexion; exquisitely tender right knee (patellar and quadriceps tendons and behind the knee); positive right knee meniscal testing (McMurray) and a positive left patellar grind (evidence of retropatellar pain). The examiner diagnosed bilateral chronic patellofemoral syndrome with recurrent patellar and quadriceps tendonitis. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed 29 months after separation, the CI reported constant right knee pain and stiffness. She reported three to four pain flare-ups per month. The physical examination demonstrated tenderness over the right patella with pain free, full, active range-of-motion. Radiographic results were documented as demonstrative of DJD in both knees.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the bilateral knee pain due to patellofemoral pain syndrome as a single unfitting condition with a disability rating of 0%, analogous to DJD. The VA described the right knee condition as “mildly disabling” residuals of a meniscus tear and assigned a 10% disability rating, code 5662 (tibia/fibula impairment of). Although VARSD §4.71a permits combined ratings of two or more joints under 5003, as adjudicated by the PEB, it also allows individual ratings for separately compensable joints. The Board may recommend separate ratings for joints adjudicated by the PEB as a single unfitting condition, if it is determined that each joint can be reasonably justified as separately unfitting and is compensable IAW VASRD §4.71a.

The Board considered if each knee could be reasonably justified as separately unfitting. Both knees were profiled and implicated in the commander’s statement. Both knees were diagnosed with retropatellar pain syndrome. Although the right knee had more demonstrable disability then the left, both were treated with activity modification, physical therapy and pain medications. The Board determined that each knee could be reasonably justified as separately unfitting. The Board then considered if there was evidence for a higher than 0% rating for each knee. The CI underwent right knee surgeries for meniscal tears. There was arthroscopic and radiographic evidence of DJD. The Board determined that the evidence supports a 10% disability rating for the right knee code 5259 (cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic). The CI was diagnosed with left knee retropatellar pain syndrome and there was objective evidence of pain on physical examination for a 10% disability rating analogous code 5099-5003 (degenerative arthritis), IAW VASRD §4.59 (Painful motion) and §4.40 (functional loss). There was no evidence of instability in either knee for additional rating under VASRD code 5257, knee other impairment of. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a 10% disability rating for each knee; a combined rating of 20%.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy DoDI 1332.39 for rating bilateral knee pain due to patellofemoral pain syndrome was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the right knee pain due to patellofemoral pain syndrome, the Board unanimously determined that it was separately unfitting and recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5259 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the left knee pain due to patellofemoral pain syndrome, the Board unanimously determined that it was separately unfitting and recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION. The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Right knee pain 5259 10%
Left knee pain due to patellofemoral pain syndrome 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130913, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record







XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150007044 (PD201301519)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01846

    Original file (PD-2013-01846.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Knee Pain5099-50030%Left Knee Degenerative Joint Disease5010-526010%20050430Right Knee Degenerative Joint Disease5010-526010%20050430Other x 4 (Not in Scope)Other x 320050503 Combined: 0%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050608 ( most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, resides in evaluating the fairness of Disability Evaluation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01629

    Original file (PD-2013-01629.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Patellofemoral Pain, Bilaterally… 5099-50030%Patellofemoral Syndrome…Left…525710%20050514Patellofemoral Syndrome…Right…52580%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 Combined: 0%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050608 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB combined the bilateral knee pain conditions as a single unfitting condition rated at 0%, coded 5099-5003 (analogous to degenerative arthritis).The PEB relied on AR 635.40...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01921

    Original file (PD-2012-01921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded history of cellulitis, left knee, chronic bilateral hip pain secondary to bilateral iliotibial band friction syndrome, chronic mechanical low back pain, mild (less than a centimeter) left shorter than right limb length discrepancy, and mild bilateral pes planus conditions.The PEBadjudicated “left patellofemoral pain with secondary chronic left knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01828

    Original file (PD-2013-01828.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Knee Pain Secondary to Retropatellar Pain Syndrome . The treatment notes, history and specific diagnosis of “retropatellar pain syndrome” support painful motion for each knee. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.In the matter of the bilateral knee pain secondary to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01053

    Original file (PD2011-01053.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW The PEB and VA each rated the left and right knees at 10% each using the criteria of disability code 5003. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02551

    Original file (PD-2013-02551.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20050201VA –(1 Day Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-50030%Patellofemoral Syndrome Left Knee5099-501410%20050317Patellofemoral Syndrome Right Knee5099-501410%20050317Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 2 Combined: 0%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050520 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). VA exam also documented crepitus (which is specified in §4.59) as well...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01272

    Original file (PD2012 01272.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service treatment records (STRs) proximate to the date of separation indicated bilateral patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) and noted pain with going up or down stairs, squatting or prolonged sitting; some.The last treatment note stated “still has moderate symptoms in the right knee with flexion.” No VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam was performed.The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB rated the combined bilateral knee pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00726

    Original file (PD2011-00726.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “MEB and PEB only looked at Patellofemoral Syndrome for 1 knee. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination completed in April 2005 noted a long history of bilateral patellofemoral syndrome that had not resolved with bilateral physical therapy, bilateral Synvisc injections, limited duty for bilateral knees, and right knee surgical lateral release and synovitis debridement. The VA C&P examination did measure the ROM of the left knee and it was normal.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02001

    Original file (PD-2013-02001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Chronic Retropatellar Pain Syndrome500310%Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Left Knee5299-52600%20040721Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Right...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01028

    Original file (PD2012 01028.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain Secondary To Idiopathic Scoliosis (EPTS), Permanently Service Aggravated529510%Idiopathic Scoliosis With Upper And Lower Back Strain NSC20030204Bilateral Knee Pain Due To PatelloFemoral Pain Syndrome5099-50030%Right Knee Patellofemoral Pain SyndromeNSC20030204Left Knee Patellofemoral Pain SyndromeNSC20030204No Additional Unfitting conditionsOther x 120030204 Combined: 10% Combined: 0% Derived from VA Rating Decision...